No, it’s connected to a Mac Studio.Are you connecting your studio display to an iOS device?
I can try with it connected to an iPad.
No, it’s connected to a Mac Studio.Are you connecting your studio display to an iOS device?
I was wondering if I plugged into my iPad would it update. I quickly realized before I tried there’s no way.No, it’s connected to a Mac Studio.
I can try with it connected to an iPad.
If I set my chair height so that my arms have the right angle using my keyboard, the non-height adjustable Studio Display is too low by 8". The hight adjustable one, at the maximum height, is too low by 4".The stand is subjectively important; for example, I have no need for a VESA mount. Regardless, I already said that the stand is the only part of the SD that is inferior to the LG 5K.
It literally doesDoes the 32" XDR need updates? I dono think so. Imagine having two of or three of these Studio Displays (like they showed in the release videos) and needing update them all just because … they have a web cam? Oh wait, folks needing 2-3 displays are likely not gonna buy two or three of these, or even one.
True, but he made up for it with crazy good innovation, and he would not let Apple continue slipping for as long as they have. Remember, he fired the entire iTools team and turnover at the exec ranks was fairly frequent... He didn’t tolerate mediocrity the way Tim Cook does.Can we please remember how many horrific designs entered the market under Steve Jobs' reign at apple? I know this may sound like heresy to some, but even St. Jobs had a very much mixed track record.
Jumping right in here.... Received my Mac Studio with Studio Display 5 days ago. Received alert for Apple Display software firmware update 15.4 and got the same error message that firmware couldn't be completed.
Called Apple tech, spend 3h on the phone with them.. They had me do all kinds of things, at one point my screen didn't even come on anymore. Eventually they said they would need to talk to an Apple engineer and get back to me next week. I wasn't even aware about the poor webcam quality, which I just checked... no words... it's horrible.
I just don't understand how a product can go on sale and have issues like this and the webcam.
This seems to be an anomaly. Apple normally waits until everything is perfect before they ship a product. I can't imagine that they didn't know about the camera problem. My guess is that they knew about it, were working on a fix, but were tied down by the Mac Studio release date. Needed to have their monitor to go with it. So in an unusual step they released the display before the camera issues were fixed and decided to take the flack.
No kidding. This sounds like a Window forum.Alarmism too much? Between the 2 “growing” threads it’s like 10 people having issues…
Pretty sure you don't even need to update it unless you want to fix the camera. If you want to buy it I would wait till all the issues with the camera is fixed.
My take is never buy 1st gen Apple redesigns.
Monitors get updates reasonably often. I have an LG ultrawide and Samsung Odyssey monitor that both get regular firmware updates. You copy them to a flash drive, stick them in a USB port, and you tell the monitor to update. It was quite important for the Odyssey since it shipped with a bug that prevented 240Hz refresh on Nvidia cards. Considering that was the monitor’s biggest selling point, not allowing monitor firmware updates would have killed the whole reason for the monitor.It's a display. Why does a display need a firmware upgrade?
Bought a Philips 23" WUXGA monitor in 2004. Great purchase. Never fails. No SW updates required. Only need to dust it off once in a while ... with a regular cloth.
I had an update for my LG ultrawide 38” ultrawide monitor. The update kept failing. Turned out I was putting it in the wrong USB port. I was doing it wrong.My $400 dell 165 Hz 27 inch 1440p monitor with gsync and AMD freesync with a height adjustable stand and various displayport and hdmi inputs has NEVER had this problem. $1600 for what??? You gotta be kidding me.
Ever looked inside any modern TV? They’re all full fledged computers, complete with CPU’s, RAM, storage and firmware upgrades. I dare say there isn’t a single piece of electronics out there that isn’t a computer. Your car is probably a computer, unless it’s about 20 years old. An A13 is probably overkill for this monitor but I’m pretty sure Apple just wanted to leverage the development already done on iOS/iPadOS for Center Stage, Spatial Audio, and Siri. They figured it was easier to just use iOS/iPadOS to drive it to save on development costs of having to do it again for another chip.A full fledge computer driving a monitor… I am now on the fence again when it comes to replacing my iMac in the next year or so
It probably is, but as a programmer, what Apple did kind of makes sense. The monitor’s three main selling points are a webcam with Center Stage, Spatial Audio, and Siri. Apple’s written and debugged much of that software already in iOS and iPadOS and didn’t want to write it again for some non A-series processor. To save development costs, they re-used code they’d already written. But in order to run that code, they needed an A-series processor. The oldest, cheapest one Apple was still making was the A13 with 64GB on the package, which they were using for the iPhone 11 and iPhone SE 2. They leveraged hardware and software already existing, which made their choices make a lot more sense.I admit that I ordered one (I have been waiting for this product so long) and I am still waiting for delivery.
Also I still believe it's a great product (and the camera issue will be addressed), but the whole ARM64 processor 64 GB memory design seems to be an overkill to me.
An intriguing hypothesis...It probably is, but as a programmer, what Apple did kind of makes sense. The monitor’s three main selling points are a webcam with Center Stage, Spatial Audio, and Siri. Apple’s written and debugged much of that software already in iOS and iPadOS and didn’t want to write it again for some non A-series processor. To save development costs, they re-used code they’d already written. But in order to run that code, they needed an A-series processor. The oldest, cheapest one Apple was still making was the A13 with 64GB on the package, which they were using for the iPhone 11 and iPhone SE 2. They leveraged hardware and software already existing, which made their choices make a lot more sense.
I’m betting the bug in the Center Stage software was due to the fact this is a 27” monitor while all other Center Stage-capable devices are all 12.9” or smaller. The much larger screen exposes the fact that all Center Stage webcams aren’t that great, but it shows up a lot more on a bigger screen. If Apple does something to fix Center Stage on this monitor, I’m betting those same fixes will go into iPadOS to improve Center Stage on the iPads, too.
Probably not. More likely it runs a stripped down version of iPadOS since iPhones don’t have Center Stage and iPads do. You’ll notice the build numbers for iPadOS and iOS are the same. What Apple likely did was take all the libraries the monitor doesn’t need and strip them out, leaving only the libraries that handle the features the monitor handles, e.g. Center Stage, Spatial Audio, and Siri. Everything else is useless and is likely removed.But does it really run iOS?
It's not "the truth" at all. It's just your belief. Jobs wasn't some perfect saint and you're not some all-knowing oracle. You do not know what Apple would be like were Jobs still alive.Sorry,its the truth....