I don't understand. Why so many people expect an NVMe SSD located inside a dock that shares its bandwidth with other devices to perform as fast as a dedicated/standalone NVMe SSD drive?
If you install a NVMe SSD you expect to get faster performance than a spinning platter, especially when everything else on the hub is disconnected.I don't understand. Why so many people expect an NVMe SSD located inside a dock that shares its bandwidth with other devices to perform as fast as a dedicated/standalone NVMe SSD drive?
Sure, but those adapters cost as much as this dock does. The market for a $5-600 dock that offers faster ethernet is going to be pretty small.Still no SFP+... despite Sonnet being one of the few manufacturers offering such TB adapters...
Indeed, we are a hostage to the controller chips. Only Intel currently provides a TB3/TB4 chip and their most recent Goshen Ridge TB device chip only has one PCIe lane available for the SSD.It is likely that this product’s controller chip is dedicating one of the four PCIe lanes available for Thunderbolt 3 / 4 connectivity to the SSD slot.
Because actual USB4 controllers won’t be out until late this year, so they are using less ideal components.
The TB4 and USB4 specifications have been finalized for quite a while now. We do need a few more companies to step up and design TB4 and USB4 controllers. Intel is the only one at the moment.Yes, but those TB4 controllers are not yet available. Standards are still being finalized.
But your 2018 enclosure likely doesn't support a display, ethernet, etc. operating all at the same time? The "problem" with the current design is that the Intel controller limits the attached PCIe device to 1 lane. As USB4 catches on, we should see more controllers appear ... hopefully, the designers will make their USB4 controllers TB4 compatible as well. Sonnet actually acknowledged this issue a few months back when people asked them about support for TB4 ... they were holding off because of the lack of controller options. Looks like the "caved in" to the pressure to release something and this is what we get. Intel deserves the blame here.My NVMe USB-C enclosure from 2018 supports 1 GByte/s transfer speeds.
2x DisplayPort
2x HDMI 2.1
1x Thunderbolt 4 to host
1x USB-C 3.2 10Gbps
3x USB-A 3.2 10Gbps
2x USB-A 3.2 5Gbps
1x USB 2.0 for charging up to 7.5W
SD and Micro SD card slots
3.5mm Audio Jack In/Out
Ethernet 2.5Gbps
Kensington Lock
DC/20V Port - 135W Power Supply Included
Indeed, we are a hostage to the controller chips. Only Intel currently provides a TB3/TB4 chip
Curious, what are people using the line out audio plugs for? An old school receiver? You'd think just about everyone would be rocking at least an optical port by now.
Apple integrates TB into the M2.The M2 Air uses an Apple chip for Thunderbolt, FWIW.
They are for directly plugging into studio monitors, which requires a line level input (higher gain than headphone jack).Don't those mostly take HDMI now?