They bought them for $3 billion, and Apple Music generated $8.3 billion in revenue last year. Great investment.Apple bought beats for their online streaming not for the headphones
They bought them for $3 billion, and Apple Music generated $8.3 billion in revenue last year. Great investment.Apple bought beats for their online streaming not for the headphones
It probably is.I just want a better and lighter version of AirPods Max with an actual case and USBC. Is that too much to ask??
This feels generous toward Apple...Sonos speakers already compete with Apple's speakers
100% agree with that .. I got rid of mine, too damn heavy, everything else was great except for the lighten port.I just want a better and lighter version of AirPods Max with an actual case and USBC. Is that too much to ask??
No thanks. The less that the bigger companies buy out the smaller ones, the better.Apple should have bought Sonos instead of Beats
why not bothApple should have bought Sonos instead of Beats
That’s definitely a thing I’ve come to take for granted. I mostly use it for switching from phone to watch, but it’s also useful for the Apple TV.I’m going to need them to put an H1/H2 whatever chip in them if possible. I’m spoiled by the fast switching on my AirPods Pro.
Then the speakers would run sonOS.Apple should have bought Sonos instead of Beats
I don't really think it's that complicated. Just like you play music services on a speaker, you'll play them via headphones. There will likely be a number of advantages. For example, by streaming to the headphones directly, you won't hear notification alerts produced by your phone. If you're streaming from another source, it's likely bluetooth and has limited range. If you have a soundbar connected to your tv, you can likely send that audio to your headphones instead. This will be helpful for those that don't have AppleTV and AirPods. You can have the equivalent of SharePlay, but not limited to two headphones. It will be easy to transition between speaker and headphones. You may be able to do this with a stereo receiver today, but then you're again limited in range. I'm sure there are other advantages.....Yes, I agree. I have plenty of them. That said, they aren't a Hi-Fi brand and don't pretend to be. They are a streaming / multi-room audio brand so I don't understand where headphones fit in.
Unfortunately this happens a lot. At least companies are starting to commit more to longer term support. For sure headphones prior to the most recent wireless versions would last for years and years, essentially until the cable wore out. But these days they are mostly limited by battery longevity.Not so good long term support though. Buy a new gen of your previous-gen speaker or get grandfathered out of the next major Sonos app update.
I was actually puzzled when Apple first bought beats. I thought the beats brand was a bit below them… I did buy some beats x a long while ago and to be fair they did last a long time and worked well. But after buying airpods I haven’t bought any other brand for earphones.Apple should have bought Sonos instead of Beats
But I think they should have taken what they needed and dispensed with the beats as a headphone brand. I never thought much of beats but knew they were bass heavy, which I do like at times.Apple bought Beats to get the music streaming rights and recommendation algorithm in Beats Music. The headphone business was just something extra that came with the deal.
Buy both. They have money.Apple should have bought Sonos instead of Beats
YepApple bought beats for their online streaming not for the headphones
Why in the world would Apple throw away money on such abysmal speakers with subpar software and hardware? It's utterly nonsensical and a complete waste!Apple should have bought Sonos instead of Beats
Not so good long term support though. Buy a new gen of your previous-gen speaker or get grandfathered out of the next major Sonos app update.
As a longtime Sonos user from pretty much day 1, the lure of headphones has been a consistent drumbeat on the Sonos user forums. When you use only one inhome app for music but then have to switch out for headphones, well, it is a nuisance. Besides as a product extension, it is really the only one left after they 'moved' into the portable speaker category a while ago. I think it is a good move and will be readily loved by users.
I think that this could bring new people in. They have an eco system, similar but obviously smaller than Apple.I have at least 12 of their speakers because I like their inter connectivity and filling my house with sound. It’s convenient and reasonable audio quality but far from great.. I hate their app. Use it only when I have to. But I see your point, that for those that like the app Sonos making headphones could make sense. But I don’t see these bringing in new people, so still question if this makes sense or not. And I doubt they will be a sound quality upgrade to get me, a Sonos owner, to switch to them.