No, no need to boycott Sony. It's simple, fire the judge. Technologically stupid/ignorant people should not be presiding over technology cases.
It lends to beyond moronic results, like this one.
It lends to beyond moronic results, like this one.
No, no need to boycott Sony. It's simple, fire the judge. Technologically stupid/ignorant people should not be presiding over technology cases.
It lends to beyond moronic results, like this one.
Aye, you speak the words of a wise old man...
They need a 20 year old judge with advanced tech knowledge to handle cases like these...
I don't know about a boycott, but I haven't bought any Sony products in like 15 years because the quality is crap.
It's not a boycott, I just don't like their stuff.
>hasnt own a Sony product in 15 years
>says the quality is crap
Whatamireading.jpg
Yeah, that's what I thought too.>hasnt own a Sony product in 15 years
>says the quality is crap
Whatamireading.jpg
Sony have fallen quite a bit since their Trinitron glory days.
Sony used to mean quality.
These days, not so much.
My 360 ,for example, has never missed a beat.
My PS3 on the other hand is a constantly overheating, flakey bag of crap.
It`s actually the first Sony product I`ve bought for above 5 or 6 years.
It`s also the last...
I don't buy Sony products...
Cheers,
Ahmed
I wouldn't boycott sony, how else could I play Fat Princess
seems like the fault lies with the federal judge for granting the subpoena.
As usual YMMV.
My PS3 has "never missed a beat" but I'm on my fourth Xbox 360 - the previous 3 having broken down.