. . . Better is a subjective word that doesn’t carry weight.. . . AirPods Max are better.
these look way better. . . AirPods Max are better.
Well, I would expect $900 headphones to look flashier than $400 ones.Oh, ok. When I think of B&O, I think flashy like the image you posted.
Yeah they look great.Gotta say, these look good. They have a B&O kind of aesthetic.
From the article:
. . . AirPods Max are better.
👍 Just don’t expect them to last 12 years.
It looks like the white versions is called silver, no?I emailed the author of this article because the White model is nowhere to be found. It looks only Silver and Black.
View attachment 2004351
I agree about built-in lithium batteries, generally. They're kind of a ticking clock to the device dying. Where feasible, it's way more eco-friendly and user-friendly to use replacable batteries (provided people use rechargables, which they should). I had a pair of Bose that used a single AA which was great because I could pack a couple Eneloops in my bag and never worry about them dying.All Airpods sucks at this too, their batteries are even worse, yes. It was more generally, any new battery driven gadget won’t last that long.
It appears that just other members here were trying to say there is a white model.It looks like the white versions is called silver, no?
I think non replaceable battery complaints in tiny in ear earphones are a classic example of virtue signally. Actual people observed behaviour shows no one actually cares, beyond just wasting their breath saying they do.I agree about built-in lithium batteries, generally. They're kind of a ticking clock to the device dying. Where feasible, it's way more eco-friendly and user-friendly to use replacable batteries (provided people use rechargables, which they should). I had a pair of Bose that used a single AA which was great because I could pack a couple Eneloops in my bag and never worry about them dying.
AirPods generally are too tiny and full of glue to have the batteries swapped, but AirPods Max are made such that the battery can be replaced. Unless some other piece of electronics dies (always possible), they could conceivably be kept running a lot longer. I have a hunch 10 years would be a stretch though -- even if they were still functioning, probably we'll be using some better wireless tech than Bluetooth by then anyway.
I love my XM4's. Probably not worth the upgrade to go for the XM5's, but to me, they are a far better value than Air Pod Max's
Just place Apple sticker on the cup and you will drool all over it.? they look generic, they look boring.
Agreed. I love my XM4s for travelling. I'm wearing them on a plane right now in fact!Sad they throw away the collapsible design. Was a very appreciated feature and one of the most criticized things about AirPod Max.
I’m in the opposite camp… I’ve got both… I think the AP Max’s sound better and for my big dome… more comfortable… but to each their own.I have the XM4's and the AirPods Max. I very rarely use the AirPods Max. I was gifted them, so I can't sell them unfortunately. For me the Sony's are much better. The kinds of sounds their ANC block (like keyboard clicks), are preferable to me. I much prefer the fuller bass, the weight, and the way they grip my head. The AirPods Max grip unevenly making it feel like the bottoms aren't fully attached. They also give me a terrible headache if I wear them for more than an hour. All in all, a bit of a bummer. If I am in the market for anything else in the next few years I'll definitely be checking out the XM5's.
Why is it virtue signaling? If you could replace the battery easily it would be less expensive than buying a new pair. If wanting to save money and not buying the same product over and over again is virtue signaling, then I’m all for it.I think non replaceable battery complaints in tiny in ear earphones are a classic example of virtue signally. Actual people observed behaviour shows no one actually cares, beyond just wasting their breath saying they do.
I love my XM4's. Probably not worth the upgrade to go for the XM5's, but to me, they are a far better value than Air Pod Max's
Subjective discussion but the general consensus is like most things wired vs wireless; wired is better for reliability, data speed (hi-res playback), and more power/watts, no battery. Wireless is great for portability, acceptability audio quality albeit limited by Bluetooth standards, and aesthetics which is subjective as well.Are wireless headphones really any good for listening to music?
Oh, no question. Based on that, I can see the resemblance with B&O’s headphones primarily in the fact that they’re both headphone products with a headband and cups that go over the ears.Well, I would expect $900 headphones to look flashier than $400 ones.