I’m guessing people who want a mini, bought a more expensive iPhone instead. That’s an upsell.A couple million devices is too little for Apple now. Asses.
Pocket? If you ask my wife, she doesn't want anything bigger than the 12 mini *in her purse*.
The basic assumption I’ve made is that the outer and the inner screen have the same height. Given the rumored diagonals, the resulting aspect ratios come out as very close to 1:√2 for both screens. The fold doesn’t come into play for that calculation. And 1:√2 happens to be the single aspect ratio where folding a rectangle in half doesn’t change its aspect ratio (the rectangle just “zooms” by a factor of √2). For a foldable iPhone, this would have the benefit that apps can be switched between inner and outer screen without having to change their layout. So that’s my working hypothesis for now, meaning a roughly 1:1.4 (or 5:7) aspect ratio for both screens.Yeah I came to a similar conclusion to you just now, after wanting to actually visualise it compared to my beloved mini (although my dimensions are a bit different). My logic is probably flawed because I can't quite wrap my head around how the hinge would fold.
There's one huge difference. Apple didn't expect the Vision Pro to sell in large numbers but instead hoped it would be a stepping stone to possible later models that might sell better. They wanted something high end so that they and users could explore possible applications without being limited by poor performance. They can use that feedback along with looking for/developing components that might either perform better or be more cost effective.The irony is: Not an insignificant number of those people likes the Vision Pro, and they act offended when others say that AVP is not a success and most people don’t care for it
And that means nothing. The iPhone mini probably sold much better than the MacBook Pro, and the former is a failure while the later is a success. Their performance is not measured by absolute numbers.Would have sold better than the Vision Pro.
Consumers voted with their wallets. They want bigger screens. You seem like someone who simply can't accept that fact.I succumbed and downgraded from a 12 Mini to a 16 when my Mini's speakers started to fail. It's been over six months and I still hate the size of the 16, its infuriating camera bump, and the too-slick-to hold glass back. I could also easily do without the camera button and the action button.
I'm certain that Apple doesn't want to deal with (1) scaling the resolution to a slightly smaller screen and (2) Apple Intelligence draining the battery.
Apple, and to a smaller degree the technorati, need to accept that technology has surpassed the needs of even the more advanced average person. The "Pro" line and regular line should be nearly indistinguishable from each other. And beneath the regular line, there should be a normie line. Yeah, I guess I'm saying we have too much technology and they should slow down.
Big screens and big batteries are necessary for small group of people. High compute power and high performing cameras are necessary for a small group of people. I would argue that a large number of these people do not actually need them to be productive or enjoy their lives - but that's beside the point.
Aside from failing components, the iPhone 12 series is still a more than usable product for most people. And the Mini version of that still has a bigger screen than every regular size phone prior to the X. (and the X was only .4" larger).
I still have my original SE that I use for a music player every day. If I could, I would be using it as my daily driver. It's a gorgeous and practical device.
I suspect they are well aware that their efforts to appeal to certain large segments of the market would mean losing other smaller segments. Virtually all manufacturers of everything know that.Well then Apple can keep waiting to get more money from me and a folding phone is going to do nothing for me as it'll be way too giant to reach everything one handed.
Yeah, I’m the same. I’m holding on my SE3, which is a really robust, powerful, efficient smartphone by today’s standards. And hopefully the iOS 19 redesign will run well on this device.Hope my 13 mini will still last for many years... Apple other phones are way too big for me.
Now, the 16e is the smallest iPhone. Let’s cross our fingers for Apple to keep this design over the 17e and 18e, otherwise we’ll face another increment in the minimum size of the iPhone dimensions.I still stand by the idea that Apple released the mini at the worst time, right after the 2nd gen SE came out, and killed it off before the people who had bought the SE wanted a new phone, less than 3.5 years later.
I would have bought the 12 mini had the SE not come out when it did. But now we all have larger, more expensive iPhones! Yay!![]()
Let me fix that for you. Now we all have larger, more expensive iPhones that last all day! Yay!I would have bought the 12 mini had the SE not come out when it did. But now we all have larger, more expensive iPhones! Yay!![]()
If only they had released the mini at a better price point or just replaced the SE with the mini at the SE price point.
This is why Apple doesn’t think people want Mini phones, IMO.It’s a shame. I’d actually buy an iPhone mini as a Pro phone, which Apple never made.
haha, you're far more analytical than me, I was just drawing random shapes 🥲The basic assumption I’ve made is that the outer and the inner screen have the same height. Given the rumored diagonals, the resulting aspect ratios come out as very close to 1:√2 for both screens. The fold doesn’t come into play for that calculation. And 1:√2 happens to be the single aspect ratio where folding a rectangle in half doesn’t change its aspect ratio (the rectangle just “zooms” by a factor of √2). For a foldable iPhone, this would have the benefit that apps can be switched between inner and outer screen without having to change their layout. So that’s my working hypothesis for now, meaning a roughly 1:1.4 (or 5:7) aspect ratio for both screens.
The only way this would be significantly wrong is if the outer screen is considerably shorter than the device, as in your video, and thus the above 1:√2 result was just a coincidence.
I get it.
And I don’t.
I love the iPhone mini 13 and if I can’t get a follow up then Motorola Razr Plus 2025 here I come as iOS 18 has lagged my mini down and the battery is degrading and barely lasts me 4 hours.
It’s a shame because I like many, hold the opinion that the mini form factor is perfect.
I love my mini. I just can’t believe that Apple, a trillion dollar company doesn’t think it’s worth making an iPhone mini. There most definitely is a market for it.
I feel Tim Cook has peaked his usefulness as a CEO. He’s taken the company as far as he can and the decisions made of late show there either needs to be new leadership or some restructuring to guide software and hardware.
Exactly.No, but if he says it we generate pages of comments…
I don't think Apple will make an iPhone smaller than 6.1" unless there is real demand for one
Can the folding phone be used with one hand like the Mini?Maybe Apple will offer a folding phone that will satisfy the folks who want a smaller iPhone.