This is an excellent move by Spotify.
The whole issue of Apple's 30% fee is now in the public spotlight. Apple need to reduce In-App Purchases to a much lower fee—perhaps 5 or 10%. I'm sure many companies have been put off selling services through the App Store because of this extortionate cost.
Well at least you gave it enough time to truly see if it's for you.
Trust me, it doesn't - here is the tip of the Iceberg. Lots needs adding to this.
https://www.evernote.com/l/ABUCB7lG8xVE15NK0e1svfX5Wy3-7801J-8
I personally have had very few problems with Apple Music, but certainly it's version 1.0 right now. Keep in mind that Spotify took *years* to get something as basic as a music library (as opposed to having to make a playlist for each album you wanted to keep).Just because you don't see "success stories" for Apple Music doesn't mean much. More people go online to complain than compliment a service. I'd take that "lot of people" with a grain of salt.
I am using Apple Music. Trust me, it works right.
I am using Apple Music. Trust me, it works right.
Also, it's pretty sad that Spotify was actually charging the higher amount to compensate for Apple tax.
People were actually paying $12.99 for a service that costs $9.99? Also, it's pretty sad that Spotify was actually charging the higher amount to compensate for Apple tax.
I love this. Hit Apple where it hurts, Spotify! *cheering*
The amount that Apple is going to lose (from people switching how they pay for their Spotify subscriptions) won't even equal a rounding error for App Store revenue.
Its unfortunate. Apple music doesn't hold a candle to spotify. The music is so slow to play. Sucks, i was hoping to get rid of spotify and free up some space.
Imagine you own a popular shopping mall in a busy, growing town.30% in perpetuity is a bit ridiculous. I always thought that maybe Apple should just be entitled to the first month's payment and then the developer keeps the remaining payments.
They will survive. Spotify just needs to work on their navigation issues and tighten their UI.
Apple Music, as it stands now, is broken, as my experience will note:
![]()
My own music is greyed out and not available for me to download MY OWN TUNES. Artwork doesn't bother to show up.
![]()
As noted above, some artwork doesn't bother to show up. The view for an artist for having multiple albums is nice though, but it doesn't always stick, as we'll see.
![]()
Yep, multiple albums by an artist sometimes shows up as a list, then the next album and song list.
![]()
Again, I don't have access to music I OWN. This is greyed out.
![]()
Another case of the wrong album art or none at all.
![]()
Wrong album art and some tracks greyed out preventing access to MY OWN music.
The number of customers Spotify retains will amount to something very measurable though.
In what way was anyone tricked? They saw that they could subscribe for $13. If people couldn't be bothered to get off their iPhone for 5 seconds to look at anything else that is their own fault.But that does not mean you trick your customers into paying the extra cost.
This is the way business works. If a business gets charged a fee or tax, they pass it on to you. If it's not obvious like this one was, that's because it's built into other pricing.
It's pretty sad Apple charges 30% no matter what, and is completely inflexible. They could probably cover costs with 5% and still make something.
I use Apple Music and I'm very happy with it. Apple Music is not error free, but I believe much of your problems come from user error.
Example: Your complaint about no album artwork on for some of your music. If the album was named correctly then the artwork would show. You have "4:21...The Day After" listed as "4.21...The Day After" and "Tical 2000: Judgement Day" listed as "Tical 2000 - Judgement Day"
Both are user error
As for the greyed out music. Go into Settings and turn on iCloud Music Library.
30% in perpetuity is a bit ridiculous. I always thought that maybe Apple should just be entitled to the first month's payment and then the developer keeps the remaining payments.
I really don't understand what your huge objection to this is. They aren't skirting Apple's rules, they are paying Apple their tax, which is making their product 30% more expensive.If they want to do that, Spotify just shouldn't use the App store. You see, there is a way...
It would have been but the way they organize music is bizarre. I like how Spotify separates the Playlists from the actual library. That way I'm not scrolling through a bunch of "albums" that only have 1 song in them just because I added a playlist. I have a TON of playlists which is why I subscribe to these services so that's possibly HUNDREDS of 1 song "albums" I have to scroll through before I get to a real full fledged album. Sure I can search for said album, but I would have to remember them. Spotify makes this easy with the My Music library feature.
Beats used to do this as well, so I'm not sure why Apple Music is mixing the two. Therefore, after a day, I knew the services wasn't going to work for me, especially after seeing changed artwork and my own music not available for me to download. That alone defeats the purchase.
I get emails from developers after purchasing apps on Mac and iOS, so I assumed my email was being shared with them already. But, I believe you have to create a Spotify account or login via Facebook, etc. and Spotify gets your email that way.
People were actually paying $12.99 for a service that costs $9.99? Also, it's pretty sad that Spotify was actually charging the higher amount to compensate for Apple tax.