Then why during there conferences they demo the Spotify app? I notice Google and MS do that too.Seems like Apple wants people to move to Apple Music. Next thing they’ll make the OS imcompatible with the Spotify app.
Then why during there conferences they demo the Spotify app? I notice Google and MS do that too.Seems like Apple wants people to move to Apple Music. Next thing they’ll make the OS imcompatible with the Spotify app.
how can an app ruin SDDs?I've been using the web player on my Macbook over the app because last year the Spotify app was found to excessively write to the SSDs and ruining the SSDs. They say it was fixed but I'm still concerned.
how can an app ruin SDDs?
And this is why Spotify will still be my number 1 music player. I want access on all my devices (from my iPhone to my roku to my desktop at work to my Echo in the kitchen)
Apple doesn't understand the microcosm of music. People don't want it walled into a private garden that you can only access with a handful of devices.
The Mac Rumors community has pleasantly surprised me this morning. I was expecting a lot of conspiracy theories from both sides about either Apple crippling Spotify or Spotify trying to hurt Apple Safari use. Seems most people are taking it at face value that Widevine is not supported in Safari. There is hope!![]()
Seems like Apple wants people to move to Apple Music. Next thing they’ll make the OS imcompatible with the Spotify app.
Mine was facetious, haha.Never too late for an inane conspiracy theory.
Confused, because WideVine's website clearly states that they support Safari on Mac OS X. Yet when you go to install it, it's only installed for Chrome. Guess Google hasn't updated their WideVine list of supported browsers? Was support removed at some point?
Confused, because WideVine's website clearly states that they support Safari on Mac OS X. Yet when you go to install it, it's only installed for Chrome. Guess Google hasn't updated their WideVine list of supported browsers? Was support removed at some point.
This strikes me as a bit odd, given Safari supports (and supported before Chrome) Encrypted Media Extensions, which I understood was the main API to be used for implementing DRM, (its used in Netflix streaming for example).
Further, I'd note that before this you could only use the Spotify web player with Flash, which many people refuse to install, so we're really sort of in a similar place re Spotify Web Player.
The option used to be installing Flash and reducing power efficiency and security, and now the option is installing Chrome and reducing power efficiency (and letting Google follow you around the internet).
Safari supports EME, but doesn't support the loading of any Content Decryption Module except for Apple's own Fairplay system. That's not the system that Spotify use (which is Widevine). To be fair, Chrome is in exactly the same boat with not supporting anything but Widevine, but reach matters and Safari increasingly looks left behind on that front (looks at Facebook video chat).
Spotify may decide to support Fairplay at some point, but who knows.
You have to ask yourselves, what technologies does chrome support that safari doesn't and why does safari not have those technologies?
That's silly, dropping a streaming service because it doesn't run on Safari? Most people will be willing to drop a browser then a streaming service.
This is more true for web browsers, i.e., Chrome offers more compatibility and features then Safari, so people will be more willing to drop Safari
Good to know. Having superficial knowledge of the EME API I was hoping these extensions could be implemented in the browser. Right now it actually makes sense for Spotify to use Widevine (if it's only supporting one), because it has the widest support.
According to MDN, Chrome, FireFox, and Opera support Widevine and ClearKey, Edge and IE support PlayReady, and Safari supports FairPlay.
Given the amount of distrust and contention EME itself created within the open source community I was really hoping it would not introduce incompatibilities like this .
No one is going to change from Spotify because it dropped support for Safari. Apple pulls the same nonsense. You had to use Safari or Microsoft Edge to watch their live stream...or people will look at an alternative streaming service.
For a lot of music fans the only difference between these services is their accessibility.
I'm beginning to wonder if this is deliberate on Apple's part since the same thing happens now with SiriusXM web player in Safari. Reported this to Apple using beta feedback a few High Sierra betas ago but nothing. Maybe Apple doesn't want any other web music player working in Safari?This issue shouldn't affect your desktop client. It only affects the web player via Safari.
No one is going to change from Spotify because it dropped support for Safari. Apple pulls the same nonsense. You had to use Safari or Microsoft Edge to watch their live stream.
I'm beginning to wonder if this is deliberate on Apple's part since the same thing happens now with SiriusXM web player in Safari. Reported this to Apple using beta feedback a few High Sierra betas ago but nothing. Maybe Apple doesn't want any other web music player working in Safari?
I don't particularly care to have to open another browser just to play SiriusXM on my MB Pro.
Just checked and Pandora still works in Safari. Interesting!
Spotify still haven't solved this issue by using the WebCrypto API like Netflix.
For anyone not up to date on this issue. The problem is entirely caused by a change on Spotify's end. Spotify previously used Flash for their Safari Player. When they stopped supporting Flash they neglected to offer an alternative for Safari users. Other browsers use Widevine, which Apple won't support because of security reasons and also because it's proprietary. Apple prefers to support WebCrypto API which is a universal open standard.