"Apple says that only iPads with the power of M1 can run Stage Manager." --- does anyone really buy this?
Yes...that would be people who don't need to be constantly upset and complain about something in order to feel good.
"Apple says that only iPads with the power of M1 can run Stage Manager." --- does anyone really buy this?
Buy it? No"Apple says that only iPads with the power of M1 can run Stage Manager." --- does anyone really buy this?
But can you do anything with the screen real estate around the small Instagram window? Is it one of the "up to 8" windows you can have floating around your iPad and external screen? Do you still need blank space between apps? I am genuinely confused as to what Apple's window management tools do these days.You can control window size, but now it doesn't have to be full screen.
I mean, I was running 4 apps on my iPad Mini last night. I didn't mean to, but I was developing an app and testing it in different views, and I ended up with two split screen apps, a slide over app, and netflix running in PiP mode."Apple says that only iPads with the power of M1 can run Stage Manager." --- does anyone really buy this?
It's on an M1 chip!
You could have have small and by itself if you want, but there's no reason to. All Stage Manager windows behave the same so you can have it next to, or overlapping other app windows, something which is impossible in iPadOS15. It seems crazy that Apple never forced split screen support with phone apps on the iPad.But can you do anything with the screen real estate around the small Instagram window? Is it one of the "up to 8" windows you can have floating around your iPad and external screen? Do you still need blank space between apps? I am genuinely confused as to what Apple's window management tools do these days.
Since Stage Manager isn't just floating windows, yes."Apple says that only iPads with the power of M1 can run Stage Manager." --- does anyone really buy this?
Running it in Safari would not give you the same notifications and Share Sheet support, but otherwise, Safari would be good enough and a solution to using split screen.Is this any better than simply running Instagram on Safari (albeit with a lot of wasted space)?
thanks for taking the time to reply. I genuinely thought phone apps could do split screen on iPad OS pre-16, hence my confusion as to what Stage Manager was bringing that was so exciting.You could have have small and by itself if you want, but there's no reason to. All Stage Manager windows behave the same so you can have it next to, or overlapping other app windows, something which is impossible in iPadOS15. It seems crazy that Apple never forced split screen support with phone apps on the iPad.
I've never understood why people want an Instagram iPad app. Aside from the obvious question of why the hell anyone uses Instagram in the first place, it's an iPad. It has a desktop class web browser.
Back in my day everything was a website and it turns out it pretty much still is.
Agreed, and yet its something internet whiners have claimed they wanted.Honestly, that's seriously pathetic. Running instagram in a tiny window on a 12.9" expensive iPad...
Smart people do, yes. The feature is a memory hog and works poorly on any lesser hardware."Apple says that only iPads with the power of M1 can run Stage Manager." --- does anyone really buy this?
Ah, yeah, fair enough. Still would prefer a dedicated app for iPad, but I can see the use case for a smaller iPhone-based app for Stage Manager.Running it in Safari would not give you the same notifications and Share Sheet support, but otherwise, Safari would be good enough and a solution to using split screen.
It makes sense that you don't understand an app that you say "why the hell anyone uses...in the first place". So not really sure why you expended the energy to comment on an app it would appear you hate. But for those who like to use it, being able to run it on an iPad, not full screen, while running other apps side by side, is appealing for many. I don't use it much, but if I ever got a notification about a friend posting while on my iPad, I would welcome this change for sure!
Aside from that, the idea of "everything was a website" makes sense if you are still at the initial concept of the internet and websites. But moving slightly past that huge leap forward back in the Web 1.0 days, we now have a more connected world where data moves faster and more freely around (for better or worse). The idea of a "website" is simply that the data moving around is displayed using HTML and other technologies instead of via Swift or C or whatever else. There is not a huge difference between an app and a webpage in the most basic terms. But that is just the starting point, not the end point. To limit the internet to that would be missing out on most of the advancements in Web 2.0, let alone 3.0 Once you start considering all the options available to a user and their data on the internet, native apps have the ability to provide a much better user experience. Doesn't mean they will, but they most certainly have a lot more potential. So while "everything still is" can be true from a limited perspective, it is very much not true in the current state of the internet and hosted data.
Excatly that. Before those ****** apps were all full screen with huge spaces all over. I don’t use insta, but there are more apps that behave like that.You can add another window to an iPhone-only app… before this couldn’t be done.
![]()
You’re thinking iOS apps on Mac for that opt-in part.I stand corrected, I didn't realise it was possible to run iPhone-only apps on iPads unless the developers 'opted in'.