I am sorely tempted to get a SS. I have a series 3 aluminum, and the screen is already really scratched up. I love the look and weight of the aluminum watch, but I hate the scratched screen. I had a series 0 SS and I hated the dim screen and the weight. I honestly cannot decide which I like better.
The screen protectors seem to only last about a week before peeling off, so that isn’t really a great solution. I even bought a glass screen protector and cracked it after two days.
Your aluminum AW3 screen is already all scratched up? Wow. That was fast.
Me too. Went from S0 SS to S3 SS.Here are some images. I like the matte black look, but I love the classy traditional stainless steel look.
I bought the SS version of the AW3 while my wife got the aluminum. We've never had Apple watches before so we wanted to try them both.
I've been wearing the SS AW3 for about 5 days now and tried on my wife's aluminum for the first time.
Wow, it is like wearing nothing but air. The SS version is extremely heavy compared the the aluminum.
Then I started to research the differences between the two. I read that the screen brightnesss is different so, I live in FL so we have plenty of sun, I took them both outside and there is definitely a noticeable difference. The ion-x glass is brighter.
So I was wondering what is the main drivers for people buying the SS version?
Am I missing something big? The SS is shiny while aluminum is matte? I'd prefer matte, the gloss looks girly in my opinion but everyone is different. I thought there were bigger differences that justified the price increase, I should have done more research.
- Sapphire glass is stronger? I put a screen protector on the ion-x which is invisible. Watch manufacturers use sapphire glass because the watches are suppose to last 5, 10 years. The AW3 will be obsolete in 1-2 years. The ion-x glass is also more shatter resistant than sapphire.
- Weight - The SS version is almost twice as heavy - it's night and day when trying them on - crazy.
- Cost - The SS is $240 more
However, I am still within my 2 week return window.
I don’t believe the aluminium watches are ‘prone’ to chipping. That makes it sound like the material is not fit for purpose and in my experience the aluminium finish is very durable. I’ve had my watch for a year now and so has my wife and neither has any chips or scratches. The cheaper price means it’s replaceable every 2-3 years to me and the lightweight feel is nice for exercising. I used to hate going for a jog with my stainless Sub jangling about on my wrist and the aluminium AW is a nice weight in my view.
A stainless Rolex Submariner is just a little bit heavier than a Apple Watch. Lol.
A stainless Rolex Submariner is just a little bit heavier than a Apple Watch. Lol.
And worth a penny or two more.![]()
[doublepost=1515305840][/doublepost]The price difference amortized over 2-3 years is irrelevant. 5-8 dollars a month is nothing.I don’t believe the aluminium watches are ‘prone’ to chipping. That makes it sound like the material is not fit for purpose and in my experience the aluminium finish is very durable. I’ve had my watch for a year now and so has my wife and neither has any chips or scratches. The cheaper price means it’s replaceable every 2-3 years to me and the lightweight feel is nice for exercising. I used to hate going for a jog with my stainless Sub jangling about on my wrist and the aluminium AW is a nice weight in my view.
The price difference amortized over 2-3 years is irrelevant. 5-8 dollars a month is nothing.
Anodized aluminum chips and scratches, that’s just how it is. You see posts on here all the time of chipped/scratched watches.
Now, if they come up with a sapphire/aluminum option that would be interesting.
As has already been added, I don’t pay for my watches monthly, I buy them in full at the time of purchase so the cost is immediately apparent.[do. A The price difference amortized over 2-3 years is irrelevant. 5-8 dollars a month is nothing.
Anodized aluminum chips and scratches, that’s just how it is. You see posts on here all the time of chipped/scratched watches.
To me the SS watches are totally worth the cost (SS 0 to SS 3). As has been said many times before, it’s personal preference and wallet size.As has already been added, I don’t pay for my watches monthly, I buy them in full at the time of purchase so the cost is immediately apparent.
I was only speaking for myself in any case. For a throwaway gadget with a limited shelf life, £329 for the aluminium is at the absolute limit I would be willing to pay. I don’t even need cellular as it’s pointless for my uses when my phone is with me anyway. I certainly don’t answer the phone when out running. The stainless model here is an eye watering £599 so nearly double the price of the aluminium. I can’t even entertain that price and trying to justify it by pretending it’s paid for with monthly instalments doesn’t wash for me.
I don’t believe aluminium watches are prone to chipping. I’m sure you can get chips with serious abuse just like we have people asking how to polish out scratches on stainless steel Apple watches. My watch has not been babied and gets a good use and I’ve not had s single chip or scratch. My wife’s is in good nick too and she wears bracelets around it often. If anodised aluminium is good enough as a durable coating in the automotive and aircraft industry, it’s good enough for a watch casing.
Don’t get me wrong, the stainless AW looks lovely, I just don’t think it’s worth its initial retail price. They are a good secondhand buy.
Except nobody factors the Apple Watch cost per month, they factor the total cost of what the Apple Watch is at the time of the purchase. It's a piece a tech, not an investment of anything like a vehicle or house.
Your Post is more of a generalization. That's not 'just how it is', as the anodized aluminum is very durable and the majority of Sport Apple Watches likely are not prone to chipping. The cases you read on a tech forum are those just reporting their own personal experiences, its a vocal minority, not the majority.
Apple won't offer sapphire with the aluminum sport model. Because it would conflate and compete with the stainless model that offers the sapphire display, which would take sales away from that specific model. Also, The Ion-X glass is more specific to the sport model, because its not prone to shattering like Sapphire is.