Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
0464BAC9-F37D-4203-AADB-E223A43159C1.jpeg I had an SS series 0 and tried the series 3 silver and space gray aluminum. I returned both for a series 3 SS. Once I had an SS, it spoiled me for anything else. I will only buy the SS in the future
 
  • Like
Reactions: asuandy
I am sorely tempted to get a SS. I have a series 3 aluminum, and the screen is already really scratched up. I love the look and weight of the aluminum watch, but I hate the scratched screen. I had a series 0 SS and I hated the dim screen and the weight. I honestly cannot decide which I like better.

The screen protectors seem to only last about a week before peeling off, so that isn’t really a great solution. I even bought a glass screen protector and cracked it after two days.

Your aluminum AW3 screen is already all scratched up? Wow. That was fast.

In regards to brightness of the SS screen, remember you can INCREASE the brightness setting on the watch, btw!
 
Polished SS gives the watch more of "piece of jewelry" appearance and tends to work with other accessories a little better. Like cuff links for example.

I have an aluminum AW and I notice while shopping for bands the bands that would give more of "classy" impression have polished hardware that would match the SS model.

While I feel there are plenty of bands that make the aluminum models look nice the SS model fits that role a little bit better.

That said I'm ok without drawing attention to my Apple Watch when there are other people wearing watches that cost as much as the vehicle I came to event in.
 
I upgraded from a Space Gray Aluminum S0 to a Stainless Steel Series 3 yesterday. It's noticeably heavier, but after a few seconds I don't notice it much on my arm. It look more premium and feels more premium. Right now I feel constantly aware of it like I need to baby it, but that will go away soon.
 
I had aluminum s3 for 2weeks.
Its my first apple watch i liked it..
Decided to sell it and get the stainless space black... ireally like the deep black finish on the stainless model....
 
Your aluminum AW3 screen is already all scratched up? Wow. That was fast.

I can't speak for that forum member, but the Ion-Glass is highly similar to the glass used on the iPhone displays. If you take care of it properly, you won't have an issue with it scratching. But like anything, it depends on the environment and how you treat your watch. Most will say that the Glass on the sport model is fairly durable, not nearly what the Sapphire display is on the stainless model.
 
I have an Apple Watch Series 0 in Silver.
It has no scratches on the glass and more than a few scuffs on the stainless steel (which is necessary to give it character).
The watch is going strong and I just got a Series 3 Space Black SS so I can have both a Silver and a Space Black Apple Watch.

Aluminum is great for exercise and movement, making it more of a SportWatch.
I got the Stainless Steel for its surgical grade cleanliness and shiny quality.
I am a Fossile and Rolex kinda guy and those finishes are so much better in Silver, which Apple doesn't use. Stainless still gets that Shiny Silver quality even if Apple does not use the material.

As for shiny being girly, don't buy an iPhone. They're all shiny.
Also, don't buy a brand new car.
Or silver. Or gold. Or anything expensive.
 
Interesting thread, I have a Tissot T Touch that I don’t wear, this is because it feels like a block of granite on my wrist due to the thick high quality stainless steel case. It feels uncomfortable.

So yesterday I got my Series 1 aluminium 42mm with white sports strap. I have a blue Defense Edge machined aliminium protective case on it and I love it.

Way more comfortable to wear and looks awesome!!

To me the cost of the SS model isn’t worth it, but to others it is..

It’s all about personal preference.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: The-Real-Deal82
Here are some images. I like the matte black look, but I love the classy traditional stainless steel look.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0429.jpg
    IMG_0429.jpg
    2 MB · Views: 381
  • IMG_0432.jpg
    IMG_0432.jpg
    1.5 MB · Views: 366
  • IMG_0428.jpg
    IMG_0428.jpg
    1.8 MB · Views: 348
  • IMG_0431.jpg
    IMG_0431.jpg
    1.8 MB · Views: 361
  • Like
Reactions: AppleKarma
I bought the SS version of the AW3 while my wife got the aluminum. We've never had Apple watches before so we wanted to try them both.
I've been wearing the SS AW3 for about 5 days now and tried on my wife's aluminum for the first time.
Wow, it is like wearing nothing but air. The SS version is extremely heavy compared the the aluminum.

Then I started to research the differences between the two. I read that the screen brightnesss is different so, I live in FL so we have plenty of sun, I took them both outside and there is definitely a noticeable difference. The ion-x glass is brighter.

So I was wondering what is the main drivers for people buying the SS version?
  • Sapphire glass is stronger? I put a screen protector on the ion-x which is invisible. Watch manufacturers use sapphire glass because the watches are suppose to last 5, 10 years. The AW3 will be obsolete in 1-2 years. The ion-x glass is also more shatter resistant than sapphire.
  • Weight - The SS version is almost twice as heavy - it's night and day when trying them on - crazy.
  • Cost - The SS is $240 more
Am I missing something big? The SS is shiny while aluminum is matte? I'd prefer matte, the gloss looks girly in my opinion but everyone is different. I thought there were bigger differences that justified the price increase, I should have done more research.
However, I am still within my 2 week return window.


The aluminum is prone to chipping and the screen will scratch. A screen protector on a watch is incredibly tacky and based on all reports I have seen on them (on the watch) they will fall off because of the constant pulling at the edges.

I have an s0ss and an s3ss. After two years of absolutely abusing the S0 (yard work, working on cars, hiking, etc) and a quick polish on the stainless it looks identical to the brand new S3. Zero scratches on the screen.

I tried an s3 aluminum and it picked up scratches on the screen after three days and I pampered that thing since it was new. I returned it.

So in a round about way my wife and I did the same experiement. I tried an aluminum for three days and we both decided her next upgrade had to be stainless, aluminum wasn’t an option.

Now, if they come up with a sapphire/aluminum option that would be interesting.
 
I don’t believe the aluminium watches are ‘prone’ to chipping. That makes it sound like the material is not fit for purpose and in my experience the aluminium finish is very durable. I’ve had my watch for a year now and so has my wife and neither has any chips or scratches. The cheaper price means it’s replaceable every 2-3 years to me and the lightweight feel is nice for exercising. I used to hate going for a jog with my stainless Sub jangling about on my wrist and the aluminium AW is a nice weight in my view.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 44267547
I don’t believe the aluminium watches are ‘prone’ to chipping. That makes it sound like the material is not fit for purpose and in my experience the aluminium finish is very durable. I’ve had my watch for a year now and so has my wife and neither has any chips or scratches. The cheaper price means it’s replaceable every 2-3 years to me and the lightweight feel is nice for exercising. I used to hate going for a jog with my stainless Sub jangling about on my wrist and the aluminium AW is a nice weight in my view.

A stainless Rolex Submariner is just a little bit heavier than a Apple Watch. Lol.
 
I don’t believe the aluminium watches are ‘prone’ to chipping. That makes it sound like the material is not fit for purpose and in my experience the aluminium finish is very durable. I’ve had my watch for a year now and so has my wife and neither has any chips or scratches. The cheaper price means it’s replaceable every 2-3 years to me and the lightweight feel is nice for exercising. I used to hate going for a jog with my stainless Sub jangling about on my wrist and the aluminium AW is a nice weight in my view.
[doublepost=1515305840][/doublepost]The price difference amortized over 2-3 years is irrelevant. 5-8 dollars a month is nothing.

Anodized aluminum chips and scratches, that’s just how it is. You see posts on here all the time of chipped/scratched watches.
 
The price difference amortized over 2-3 years is irrelevant. 5-8 dollars a month is nothing.

Except nobody factors the Apple Watch cost per month, they factor the total cost of what the Apple Watch is at the time of the purchase. It's a piece a tech, not an investment of anything like a vehicle or house.

Anodized aluminum chips and scratches, that’s just how it is. You see posts on here all the time of chipped/scratched watches.

Your Post is more of a generalization. That's not 'just how it is', as the anodized aluminum is very durable and the majority of Sport Apple Watches likely are not prone to chipping. The cases you read on a tech forum are those just reporting their own personal experiences, its a vocal minority, not the majority.

Now, if they come up with a sapphire/aluminum option that would be interesting.

Apple won't offer sapphire with the aluminum sport model. Because it would conflate and compete with the stainless model that offers the sapphire display, which would take sales away from that specific model. Also, The Ion-X glass is more specific to the sport model, because its not prone to shattering like Sapphire is.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: The-Real-Deal82
[do. A The price difference amortized over 2-3 years is irrelevant. 5-8 dollars a month is nothing.

Anodized aluminum chips and scratches, that’s just how it is. You see posts on here all the time of chipped/scratched watches.
As has already been added, I don’t pay for my watches monthly, I buy them in full at the time of purchase so the cost is immediately apparent.

I was only speaking for myself in any case. For a throwaway gadget with a limited shelf life, £329 for the aluminium is at the absolute limit I would be willing to pay. I don’t even need cellular as it’s pointless for my uses when my phone is with me anyway. I certainly don’t answer the phone when out running. The stainless model here is an eye watering £599 so nearly double the price of the aluminium. I can’t even entertain that price and trying to justify it by pretending it’s paid for with monthly instalments doesn’t wash for me.

I don’t believe aluminium watches are prone to chipping. I’m sure you can get chips with serious abuse just like we have people asking how to polish out scratches on stainless steel Apple watches. My watch has not been babied and gets a good use and I’ve not had s single chip or scratch. My wife’s is in good nick too and she wears bracelets around it often. If anodised aluminium is good enough as a durable coating in the automotive and aircraft industry, it’s good enough for a watch casing.

Don’t get me wrong, the stainless AW looks lovely, I just don’t think it’s worth its initial retail price. They are a good secondhand buy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 44267547
As has already been added, I don’t pay for my watches monthly, I buy them in full at the time of purchase so the cost is immediately apparent.

I was only speaking for myself in any case. For a throwaway gadget with a limited shelf life, £329 for the aluminium is at the absolute limit I would be willing to pay. I don’t even need cellular as it’s pointless for my uses when my phone is with me anyway. I certainly don’t answer the phone when out running. The stainless model here is an eye watering £599 so nearly double the price of the aluminium. I can’t even entertain that price and trying to justify it by pretending it’s paid for with monthly instalments doesn’t wash for me.

I don’t believe aluminium watches are prone to chipping. I’m sure you can get chips with serious abuse just like we have people asking how to polish out scratches on stainless steel Apple watches. My watch has not been babied and gets a good use and I’ve not had s single chip or scratch. My wife’s is in good nick too and she wears bracelets around it often. If anodised aluminium is good enough as a durable coating in the automotive and aircraft industry, it’s good enough for a watch casing.

Don’t get me wrong, the stainless AW looks lovely, I just don’t think it’s worth its initial retail price. They are a good secondhand buy.
To me the SS watches are totally worth the cost (SS 0 to SS 3). As has been said many times before, it’s personal preference and wallet size.
 
Saphire is much better than the glass. It isn't something you will notice until you mark or damage the glass.

The aluminium body is weaker than the SS and as such will chip and dint if you bash it against things.

Unfortunately those differences mean a weight and cost penalty.

I would buy a sport for doing sport things where I would expect it to be bashed around, as it is cheaper. I would buy an SS to wear as a watch, rather than a fitness companion.
 
My personal experience:

I bought the Series 0 at launch. SS w Link Bracelet. Beautiful. Couldn’t scratch the screen if I tried. Then started hearing rumors of the Series 2 coming out. And as I’m an Apple fanboy I always have to upgrade to the latest and greatest. So when the S2 launched I ordered the aluminum Nike+ version in space grey. Scratched the screen and chipped it within the first month.

The reason I tried aluminum in the S2 was because I figured why spend the extra $$ when I’m upgrading every year (even though it doesn’t stand up to wear and tear like SS).

Series 3 launch rolls around one year later justifying (for me personally) my reasons for sticking with aluminum. Ordered the Nike+ again.

So those are my reasons. However if money was not an issue I would go w SS every time. So IMHO if you plan to upgrade every time aluminum seems to be the prudent choice. But ultimately to each his/hers own for whatever their reasons.

PS- at the beginning of this forum people were ripping the thread starter for a few reasons. Lay off, this is what forums are for no matter how stupid YOU think it is. Don’t like the thread? Don’t participate in it. So many defensive (and way too sensitive) people with too much time on their hands.
 
I got the aluminum just after launch and it went to my wife after I got the S2 aluminum at Christmas last year - it was with us for 2.5 years and has held up quite well (now with her father to see if he/his wife want to jump in), my S2 had a couple more dings on it (and went to my aunt) but was still in pretty good shape... We're both on S3 aluminums now - I would love to go SS (my parents got them at S0 but now have aluminum S3s), but I don't yet have the funds to justify that since I've been replacing them annually - I really want a SBSS link (or space gray ceramic to be honest), but it's tough when they cost over a grand and are presently improving so much on an annual basis... some day!
 
Except nobody factors the Apple Watch cost per month, they factor the total cost of what the Apple Watch is at the time of the purchase. It's a piece a tech, not an investment of anything like a vehicle or house.



Your Post is more of a generalization. That's not 'just how it is', as the anodized aluminum is very durable and the majority of Sport Apple Watches likely are not prone to chipping. The cases you read on a tech forum are those just reporting their own personal experiences, its a vocal minority, not the majority.



Apple won't offer sapphire with the aluminum sport model. Because it would conflate and compete with the stainless model that offers the sapphire display, which would take sales away from that specific model. Also, The Ion-X glass is more specific to the sport model, because its not prone to shattering like Sapphire is.

People with any concept of money factor in the cost over the lifetime of a purchase, not just the initial purchase price. When you make a value decision that is the metric you go with.

If you control budget at a company and make a purchase that is a depreciating asset (like an Apple Watch) monthly tends to be the metric you think in as it will hit your budget that way.

Aluminum just isn’t an option for me due to the screen. I scratched the one I tried in three days. I couldn’t scratch my s0 with two years of heavy abuse.

As far as shattering goes that is more theoretical than anything, real world testing shows there is either no difference or the saphire is less prone to shattering than the glass.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.