Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
[warning: mild vulgarity]

Apple's exorbitant prices reminds me of the immortal question, why does a dog lick his balls?

Because he can.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The-Real-Deal82
LOL - that is so true. I would take a nice Omega or Rolex over a SS Apple watch any day of the week. :)

I have three Omegas (two Seamasters and a Planet Ocean) that have sat on a winder in my safe ever since Apple Watch 0. I totally agree regarding style, but the functionality outweighs the style factor for me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dotnet and ljusmc
I have three Omegas (two Seamasters and a Planet Ocean) that have sat on a winder in my safe ever since Apple Watch 0. I totally agree regarding style, but the functionality outweighs the style factor for me.

I still wear mine as for some occasions my AW can’t compete. It’s nice on holiday or at a wedding when you don’t want to be bothered by notifications too. In regards to style the AW isn’t quite as nice looking as most of my other watches either lol.
 
I still wear mine as for some occasions my AW can’t compete. It’s nice on holiday or at a wedding when you don’t want to be bothered by notifications too. In regards to style the AW isn’t quite as nice looking as most of my other watches either lol.

I love my Apple Watches, but they don't apply for every occasion for me. My other Watches still have there place for certain occasions, but my Apple Watch see's more use over a longer period. But I have not forgotten about my Non-Apple Watches.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The-Real-Deal82
I bought the SS version of the AW3 while my wife got the aluminum. We've never had Apple watches before so we wanted to try them both.
I've been wearing the SS AW3 for about 5 days now and tried on my wife's aluminum for the first time.
Wow, it is like wearing nothing but air. The SS version is extremely heavy compared the the aluminum.

Then I started to research the differences between the two. I read that the screen brightnesss is different so, I live in FL so we have plenty of sun, I took them both outside and there is definitely a noticeable difference. The ion-x glass is brighter.

So I was wondering what is the main drivers for people buying the SS version?
  • Sapphire glass is stronger? I put a screen protector on the ion-x which is invisible. Watch manufacturers use sapphire glass because the watches are suppose to last 5, 10 years. The AW3 will be obsolete in 1-2 years. The ion-x glass is also more shatter resistant than sapphire.
  • Weight - The SS version is almost twice as heavy - it's night and day when trying them on - crazy.
  • Cost - The SS is $240 more
Am I missing something big? The SS is shiny while aluminum is matte? I'd prefer matte, the gloss looks girly in my opinion but everyone is different. I thought there were bigger differences that justified the price increase, I should have done more research.
However, I am still within my 2 week return window.

When I bought the series0 I went SS, but when I upgraded to the series3 I opted for Aluminum. I SS looks better and be classed up, but the aluminum is definitely lighter, and I usually wear sport bands anyways.
 
Times have changed. I see mechanical watches purely as items of jewellery. Let's be honest, we don't need a time teller on our wrist. What we need is an interactive device that not only enhances our productivity, but adapts and evolves to our individual needs.
Exactly.
 
Times have changed. I see mechanical watches purely as items of jewellery. Let's be honest, we don't need a time teller on our wrist. What we need is an interactive device that not only enhances our productivity, but adapts and evolves to our individual needs.

Plenty of people still use watches for telling the time, believe me. The smartwatch doesn’t appeal to every consumer yet.
 
Plenty of people still use watches for telling the time, believe me. The smartwatch doesn’t appeal to every consumer yet.
True but, many people don’t wear a watch because, they get the time from their phone. I admit the mechanical watch isn’t going away. Mechanical watches have the bling factor that appeals to a lot of people.
 
The stainless steel model suits the heavier metal bands better. However the aluminium one is more honest to what it is, a disposable tech item designed for you to mix and match to suit your mood or necessity.

The stainless steel finish tries hard to mimic that typical watch style, so traditionalists may well be more attracted to that finish. My humble opinion is that the very soft pebble-like nature of the device works against the aggressive or masculine style that a lot of traditional watch wearers are attracted to though.

It’s clear that the watch band team is having fun exploring new materials and styles that may to suit the aluminium finish better going forward.

The only thing I wish is that Apple:

a) sold the lugs separately and

b) sold the lugs with an aluminium or just matching matte finish.

I’ve been flip flopping on getting one of these watches ever since they were released and I think I’m finally going to get a couple for Christmas for me and my partner.
 
The alu feels like a toy, whereas the SS model feels very luxurious. Mine felt so heavy with a sports band that I was about to trade it in for a sports when I spotted a classic leather band in CEX for £35. It was grade C but actually looked like a brand new band. They marked it down as leather loop and I got £5 back! Not bad! :) But with the leather band it feels so much lighter while still looking luxurious!

I will trade the watch at some point for a Series 2 SS model. I love it but no way is it worth the full price! Especially as it depreciates so fast!

I agree about traditional watches! Just fancy jewellery. They use a generic off the shelf movement, manufacturers change a few things, and put it in a nice case with a band or bracelet. Charging as much as they can. No different to what Apple does (or did with the gold model). The mark up is so high on traditional watches. Go in a shop with cash and you can get hundreds of pounds knocked off (even thousands) depending on the model. They hold their value still but will they in the future?
 
True but, many people don’t wear a watch because, they get the time from their phone. I admit the mechanical watch isn’t going away. Mechanical watches have the bling factor that appeals to a lot of people.

I'm not so sure about your bolded statement, where your metric may vary. It could depend on the demographic of who were talking about and their overall attire. My anecdotal experience, is the majority of individuals I know, do wear watches, however are mostly male, which could be a smart watch or mechanical watch. I think the smart watch is very predominant for many to wear on a daily basis, but mechanical watches do have a place in this world for certain occasions.
 
I'm not so sure about your bolded statement, where your metric may vary. It could depend on the demographic of who were talking about and their overall attire. My anecdotal experience, is the majority of individuals I know, do wear watches, however are mostly male, which could be a smart watch or mechanical watch. I think the smart watch is very predominant for many to wear on a daily basis, but mechanical watches do have a place in this world for certain occasions.
I didn’t bold the text. Someone else must have wanted to stress that point and
Bolded it.
 
I'm getting SS for xmas and DD is getting alum. we'll do a flawed A/B comparison -- hers is 38, mine is 42. However, we'll do a great A/B bluetooth earbud comparison! (actually a/b/c/d since whole family's getting earbuds and I bought diff models for just this reason)
 
I bought the SS with the leather band and returned it because I couldn’t justify the $400 premium.

Every day I look at my space gray aluminum and pine for SS....
 
I bought the SS with the leather band and returned it because I couldn’t justify the $400 premium.

Every day I look at my space gray aluminum and pine for SS....
It’s only money. Get what you want if you can afford it. It made me crazy when I settled for less in the past. I eventually got what I wanted but, it cost me more in the long run. If I can’t afford what I really want I don’t buy.
 
I bought the SS with the leather band and returned it because I couldn’t justify the $400 premium.

Every day I look at my space gray aluminum and pine for SS....

As someone who owned both models, the stainless model really exemplifies just more quality with the 316 L stainless and the sapphire display . That's what you're really purchasing with the stainless model, is the more premium build. Otherwise, both watches really are exactly the same with the exception of materials used.
 
As someone who owned both models, the stainless model really exemplifies just more quality with the 316 L stainless and the sapphire display . That's what you're really purchasing with the stainless model, is the more premium build. Otherwise, both watches really are exactly the same with the exception of materials used.
I have that very model. Cost me peanuts, I got it a year and a bit later :)

Just wait! or visit CEX. Dirt cheap in there.
 
Wow, this thread has legs!

Personally, I got the S3 aluminum for fitness usage.

I do appreciate the look of the stainless steel but not at its price point.
I have considered finding a used (cheap) S0 stainless steel purely for dressier occasions.

The route may end up to be roughly the same price if I just bought a S3 SS.
 
TLDR version: the SS is the goods; if you can afford the upgrade, do it.

OK, now for my long-winded exposition:

A bit of background - I'm a huge watch nerd; been "collecting" pieces for years and eventually went up the quality and price scale until I hit, what I would consider, a respectable middle-of-the-road collection (Omega, Ball, Kobold, Sinn, Seiko, etc.). Not Rolex-level stuff, but respectable, nonetheless. As is often the case, my interest in watches started to wain and I sold off most of my collection; settling on more affordable mechanicals and G-Shocks.

I'm also a gadget nerd, so when the S0 was announced, my interest was piqued. But, still having a number of watches in my rotation, I didn't see me sticking with only one daily wearer like a smart watch. After all, the benefit, as I saw/see to wearing a smart watch, would be minimized if you only wore it sparingly or as part of a larger watch rotation. But, I was certainly intrigued by the S0 and its integration with the iPhone. However, I initially passed for reasons outlined above.

A few months later, on a whim, I picked up Series 0 Sport at my local Best Buy. I was instantly hooked by the functionality of the Apple Watch, but wasn't 100% sold on the overall look and feel of the device - flimsy, almost toy-like and a square case?! C'mon! But, it grew on me for many reasons - ease of use, the amount if info it provided, the absolute dream of how easy it is to switch out straps, etc., etc., etc.

So, I held onto the S0 until the S1/S2 were announced. The S0 was perfectly fine for my use, but a little bump in processing power wouldn't be bad, right? So I caved and picked up a S1 Sport, you know, just to try it out. Hanging on to both for a while, I really got used to the ecosystem of Apple Watch and iPhone and fully benefited from the advanced functionality. But, me being who I am, I got bored and sold everything (I tend to go a bit overboard with accessories and the like, so I had invested in a ton of straps, chargers, and other various Apple Watch-related things). I pulled the old collection out of the watch box and left the AW in my rear view mirror.

Then, the damned S3 was announced. Fast? Check. Good amount of storage? Check. Water proof/resistance? Check. LTE? Check (although not very important to me, at least now). So, again, a quick trip to the local Best Buy had me setting up a S3 non-LTE Sport. Up until then, I had never considered the SS models at all, as I surmised, and my track record would indicate, that these Apple Watches were somewhat disposable, as we all know how quickly technology advances - next year, the best Apple Watch would be announced, and the next best one the year after, and so on and so on. So, it seemed silly to me to drop a good chunk of change when the watch would be "old" and/or "obsolete" in a year or so.

I was happy to be back with the Apple Watch and quickly moved my other watches back into the watch box. I was happy with the S3 non-LTE, I really was. Then, I got a small scratch on the screen, which was only visible in direct, and I mean DIRECT light, like a flashlight. In other words, I never saw the scratch unless I was looking for it and even then I had to get out a flashlight so I could go, "yep, there's a scratch there, crap." It bothered me to the point where I started to think "replacement" or "upgrade" or "you NEED a new watch"....

I contemplated another aluminum model and was close to pulling the trigger on one until I thought, "hmmmm, maybe a stainless steel one this time?" After all, coming from the world of middle-of-the-road mechanical pieces which were mostly, it not all constructed of stainless steel, I would know what to expect. Plus, if the reason I was "upgrading" was because of a scratch on the screen, wouldn't it make sense to get a better, more durable screen, like sapphire?

So, I set in motion plans to upgrade to the SB SS version and boy, am I happy I did! Everything is just superior to the aluminum models - better weight, sapphire crystal, DLC, etc. I was a bit worried about the extra weight, but in reality, I find the SS to actually sit better on my wrist because of the weight. If not tightened down pretty snuggly, the aluminum AWs would float around on my wrist, requiring me to adjust the watch multiple times a day. With the SS version, the watch just stays put. I'm not a flashy dude, so I was a bit concerned that the polished SS would look a little too "blingy" (do the kids still say that?), but to my delight, the watch looks stunning - as many have mentioned before, the screen and case blend together in such a way that the watch looks like one, solid piece on the wrist. I also find that straps tend to look better against the deep black of the SBSS vs. the almost-purple-ish color of the Space Grey, but that's just a personal observation.

All of this is to say, as a huge proponent of the aluminum versions of the AW, I was perfectly happy sporting the Sport models. But, I am very pleasantly surprised at how much I'm liking the stainless version, even more than I expected to be. I believe it's a worthy upgrade, overall.
 
SS all the way. It goes with the most bands, scratches can be removed with a capecod cloth and the sapphire crystal is a must for a watch.
 
TLDR version: the SS is the goods; if you can afford the upgrade, do it.

OK, now for my long-winded exposition:

A bit of background - I'm a huge watch nerd; been "collecting" pieces for years and eventually went up the quality and price scale until I hit, what I would consider, a respectable middle-of-the-road collection (Omega, Ball, Kobold, Sinn, Seiko, etc.). Not Rolex-level stuff, but respectable, nonetheless. As is often the case, my interest in watches started to wain and I sold off most of my collection; settling on more affordable mechanicals and G-Shocks.

I'm also a gadget nerd, so when the S0 was announced, my interest was piqued. But, still having a number of watches in my rotation, I didn't see me sticking with only one daily wearer like a smart watch. After all, the benefit, as I saw/see to wearing a smart watch, would be minimized if you only wore it sparingly or as part of a larger watch rotation. But, I was certainly intrigued by the S0 and its integration with the iPhone. However, I initially passed for reasons outlined above.

A few months later, on a whim, I picked up Series 0 Sport at my local Best Buy. I was instantly hooked by the functionality of the Apple Watch, but wasn't 100% sold on the overall look and feel of the device - flimsy, almost toy-like and a square case?! C'mon! But, it grew on me for many reasons - ease of use, the amount if info it provided, the absolute dream of how easy it is to switch out straps, etc., etc., etc.

So, I held onto the S0 until the S1/S2 were announced. The S0 was perfectly fine for my use, but a little bump in processing power wouldn't be bad, right? So I caved and picked up a S1 Sport, you know, just to try it out. Hanging on to both for a while, I really got used to the ecosystem of Apple Watch and iPhone and fully benefited from the advanced functionality. But, me being who I am, I got bored and sold everything (I tend to go a bit overboard with accessories and the like, so I had invested in a ton of straps, chargers, and other various Apple Watch-related things). I pulled the old collection out of the watch box and left the AW in my rear view mirror.

Then, the damned S3 was announced. Fast? Check. Good amount of storage? Check. Water proof/resistance? Check. LTE? Check (although not very important to me, at least now). So, again, a quick trip to the local Best Buy had me setting up a S3 non-LTE Sport. Up until then, I had never considered the SS models at all, as I surmised, and my track record would indicate, that these Apple Watches were somewhat disposable, as we all know how quickly technology advances - next year, the best Apple Watch would be announced, and the next best one the year after, and so on and so on. So, it seemed silly to me to drop a good chunk of change when the watch would be "old" and/or "obsolete" in a year or so.

I was happy to be back with the Apple Watch and quickly moved my other watches back into the watch box. I was happy with the S3 non-LTE, I really was. Then, I got a small scratch on the screen, which was only visible in direct, and I mean DIRECT light, like a flashlight. In other words, I never saw the scratch unless I was looking for it and even then I had to get out a flashlight so I could go, "yep, there's a scratch there, crap." It bothered me to the point where I started to think "replacement" or "upgrade" or "you NEED a new watch"....

I contemplated another aluminum model and was close to pulling the trigger on one until I thought, "hmmmm, maybe a stainless steel one this time?" After all, coming from the world of middle-of-the-road mechanical pieces which were mostly, it not all constructed of stainless steel, I would know what to expect. Plus, if the reason I was "upgrading" was because of a scratch on the screen, wouldn't it make sense to get a better, more durable screen, like sapphire?

So, I set in motion plans to upgrade to the SB SS version and boy, am I happy I did! Everything is just superior to the aluminum models - better weight, sapphire crystal, DLC, etc. I was a bit worried about the extra weight, but in reality, I find the SS to actually sit better on my wrist because of the weight. If not tightened down pretty snuggly, the aluminum AWs would float around on my wrist, requiring me to adjust the watch multiple times a day. With the SS version, the watch just stays put. I'm not a flashy dude, so I was a bit concerned that the polished SS would look a little too "blingy" (do the kids still say that?), but to my delight, the watch looks stunning - as many have mentioned before, the screen and case blend together in such a way that the watch looks like one, solid piece on the wrist. I also find that straps tend to look better against the deep black of the SBSS vs. the almost-purple-ish color of the Space Grey, but that's just a personal observation.

All of this is to say, as a huge proponent of the aluminum versions of the AW, I was perfectly happy sporting the Sport models. But, I am very pleasantly surprised at how much I'm liking the stainless version, even more than I expected to be. I believe it's a worthy upgrade, overall.


The problem is that the new Apple Watch series 3 only offers the SS w GPS AND CELLULAR. As a result, the starting price for a 42mm one is $650!

Furthermore and unlike the iPhone, has anyone else noticed how much the AW depreciates over the year?? It is insane!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.