Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Skydance still supports making new Star Trek - they are actively developing a new movie installment - but I believe they do not want to continue what was commissioned before they took over. Ellison prefers to work with his own creatives, so I tend to think Kurtzman's contract may not be extended and the shows he oversaw are being wrapped up to allow a new franchise head to create their own vision.

This brings about the question: who truly does own the Star Trek IP? I ask because Roddenberry has been heavily involved with the production of all of the newer series.. if he still held the rights, he could take his toys and find a better pasture.

BL.
 
Pretty sure Roddenberry and his estate have not had any real control since early TNG at the latest.

SkyDance owns the IP, the film rights and the television rights.
 
I love Star Trek. For over sixty years, in syndication, the various incarnations from OS to ENT have given us an optimistic vision for the future of humanity. It didn't take itself too seriously, but you still got a sense of honor and dedication to the mission. Social issues were addressed, but you weren't waterboarded with them. There was an outward focus. How would humanity cope with strange new world and new civilizations?

Star Fleet Academy failed because it was largely inwardly focused. It was about young adult problems and anxieties. It could have taken place on any expensive liberal arts college in current times. It was not an academy, it was a campus where people"found" themselves. No duty, discipline, or mission. No sense of wonder and exploration. Just a bunch of young people dealing with their feelings. Melrose Place in space. Too bad. It was a lost opportunity, and probable set the franchise back a decade.

BTW - I am not knocking young people going to liberal arts colleges to find themselves. I sent three of my kids to just such universities. But, in no way would I compare their experiences to what would be required of an academy.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BigMcGuire
Everyone loves money. Ellison didn't pay $8 billion to buy Paramount and put one of its flagship franchises on ice.

It will be time to worry when Taylor Sheridan is announced as the new head of ST, and decides to make "Yellowstone in Space."
 
It will be time to worry when Taylor Sheridan is announced as the new head of ST, and decides to make "Yellowstone in Space."

Billy Bob Thornton as Billy Bob Thornton managing a Ferengi dilithium mining operation. While Starfleet is "seeking out new life," he is the guy who has to negotiate with that new life because they’re sitting on a giant crystalline deposit and they've got forty-eight hours to vacate before the orbital drill arrives and the latinum starts flowing. SPACEMAN.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: TheIntruder
Billy Bob Thornton as Billy Bob Thornton managing a Ferengi dilithium mining operation. While Starfleet is "seeking out new life," he is the guy who has to negotiate with that new life because they’re sitting on a giant crystalline deposit and they've got forty-eight hours to vacate before the orbital drill arrives and the latinum starts flowing. SPACEMAN.

It will have to be set before The Burn. 😛
 
Star Fleet Academy failed because it was largely inwardly focused.
It failed for many reasons, though I agree with you about teen angst and anxity. Star trek wasn't the best vehicle for that sort of show format.

Other reasons; largely abandoned the foundational elements that made Star Trek great.
They were more interested in checking off those social line items that too many shows seem concerned about.
They also ignored lore - trashing "Let That Be Your Last BattlefieldL TOS episode when they introduced a female Cheronians and lets not forget the revamped klingons and the Jem'Hadar
 
Star Fleet Academy failed because it was largely inwardly focused.

So BH90210 in space...

Which isn't that bad of an idea. Maybe not as the only ST show at a time but surely good enough for extended lore.

But lets be real, people trashed Picard which was 100% fan service, they trashed Discovery despite it doing all the social justice stuff TOS would have done just not with straight overweight men in funky shirts as heroes saving the day last minute.

The whole fanbase might have gone far too toxic for anything working.
 
But lets be real, people trashed Picard which was 100% fan service...

Picard S3 was literally TNG S8 and people still complained. 🙄


...they trashed Discovery despite it doing all the social justice stuff TOS would have done just not with straight overweight men in funky shirts as heroes saving the day last minute.

And people trashed The Next Generation for the same reason. 🙄


The whole fanbase might have gone far too toxic for anything working.

Everything is so polarized now that I am frankly surprised we find consensus on something as basic as we need air to breathe. 😛
 
So BH90210 in space...

Which isn't that bad of an idea. Maybe not as the only ST show at a time but surely good enough for extended lore.
Not if it 💩 on prior lore. A female Jem Ha'dar? They're mass produced in vats and they're all male. Way to 💩 on lore. Disco with it's new look Klingons. Again, 💩 on prior lore.
But lets be real, people trashed Picard which was 100% fan service,
They changed Picard from an Ubermensch into Space Captain Noir. He was hard boiled, man.😑 The original crew got the thug treatment. Quit 💩-ing on lore.
they trashed Discovery despite it doing all the social justice stuff TOS would have done just not with straight overweight men in funky shirts as heroes saving the day last minute.
TOS is good story with a side of social justice. The story is the meat and potatoes, the social justice aspect is the seasoning. The only TOS episode where social justice was the main course was Let That Be Your Last Battlefield. That episode was awful as far as TOS episodes goes.
The whole fanbase might have gone far too toxic for anything working.
The message from the fanbase, the old school Trekkies/Trekkers is don't F with the old lore.
 
A female Jem Ha'dar? They're mass produced in vats and they're all male.

They were cloned/breed from some source DNA 900 years prior by the Dominion which hasn't been around for just as long. So yeah nothing could have changed.....

TOS is good story with a side of social justice.

TOS was typical 60s TV with 3rd class actors following scripts that had just enough story in it to get the viewer of the next commercial break.
Nostalgia is a potent drug. (which is the reason why the old fans are and never will be happy with anything new)
 
TOS is good story with a side of social justice. The story is the meat and potatoes, the social justice aspect is the seasoning.
Spot on. We tune into ST to watch good science fiction. Good stories with interesting characters from different planets. I am perfectly fine with sprinkling in some larger messages and social justice issues to add punch to the story. But, SFA waterboarded the viewer with young adult angst and SJ messaging. Frankly, not only did it mess-up the story, but it actually detracted from the messaging.

A Star Fleet cadet is suppose to be the cream of the crop. Highly competitive admission. Not helpless pathetic individuals that swallow their com-badge. And what is with all of these fat and out of shape cadets and officers? There is no fitness requirement for candidacy like every other academy?

It isn't enough that a teacher and second in command are lesbian lovers? It isn't enough that one of the cadets is nonbinary and vomits rainbow sprinkles? They had to make a member of the Klingon warrior race a gay cross dresser. They are beating this message to death, and it loses impact.

The "Captain" behaved more like a nursery school teacher than a disciplined leader. When she wasn't curled up barefoot in the captain's chair with a good book (while on duty for goodness sake), she was tending to the cadets feeling, especially one individual that she gave special treatment and attention....so, she had a favorite...nice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigMcGuire
Hey, Roddenberry sold Star Trek to NBC as "Wagon Train to the Stars". 😛

That is true, but thematically, I believe that series was still about a journey, and discovery. Star Trek.

There are a lot of successful TV producers who are good at what they do, and have their devotees. Sheridan, Dick Wolf, Ryan Murphy, Shonda Rhimes, John Wells, etc.

But I don't Sheridan, or any of the above, would be necessarily be suited for ST, and what it aims for.

That's not to say they couldn't, or pull off what someone like Tony Gilroy did for Star Wars, but that was a rarity.

Outside of SNW and LD, recent ST, including the movies, haven't really drawn me in. But it is enough of a constant that whomever takes the reins will at least get a look at what their vision for the franchise is.
 
Spot on. We tune into ST to watch good science fiction. Good stories with interesting characters from different planets. I am perfectly fine with sprinkling in some larger messages and social justice issues to add punch to the story. But, SFA waterboarded the viewer with young adult angst and SJ messaging. Frankly, not only did it mess-up the story, but it actually detracted from the messaging.

A Star Fleet cadet is suppose to be the cream of the crop. Highly competitive admission. Not helpless pathetic individuals that swallow their com-badge. And what is with all of these fat and out of shape cadets and officers? There is no fitness requirement for candidacy like every other academy?

It isn't enough that a teacher and second in command are lesbian lovers? It isn't enough that one of the cadets is nonbinary and vomits rainbow sprinkles? They had to make a member of the Klingon warrior race a gay cross dresser. They are beating this message to death, and it loses impact.

The "Captain" behaved more like a nursery school teacher than a disciplined leader. When she wasn't curled up barefoot in the captain's chair with a good book (while on duty for goodness sake), she was tending to the cadets feeling, especially one individual that she gave special treatment and attention....so, she had a favorite...nice.
Well said.

People don't dislike this show because they are toxic straight white men, they don't like it because it is just bad story telling. All these shows that fail go and blame the fan base like they are too stupid and can only like one thing. It is in fact the fans that care about the show and continuity, they want things to make sense in the universe created. People can spot this garbage pretty quickly from the trailers and are largely correct when it is finally released. Rings of Power has gone through the same thing, they bastardize the world masterfully created by Tolkien and then go and blame the fanbase for being racist, homophobic and everything else when in reality they actually care about the story and lore when the actors and people making the show in fact do not.
 
Well said.

People don't dislike this show because they are toxic straight white men, they don't like it because it is just bad story telling. All these shows that fail go and blame the fan base like they are too stupid and can only like one thing. It is in fact the fans that care about the show and continuity, they want things to make sense in the universe created. People can spot this garbage pretty quickly from the trailers and are largely correct when it is finally released. Rings of Power has gone through the same thing, they bastardize the world masterfully created by Tolkien and then go and blame the fanbase for being racist, homophobic and everything else when in reality they actually care about the story and lore when the actors and people making the show in fact do not.
Indeed, Andor didn't mess Star Wars Canon or continuity except for minor things, for example Mon Motha made her speech denouncing Palpatine in the animated series Rebels - which I have not watched - after escaping Coruscant. There were a lot of excellent woman actors, an LGBTQ coiuple (Val and Cinta played by Faye Marsay and Varada Sethu both gorgeous 🫠), many "minorities" and even a robot or two 😉. The story and writing denoucing authoritarianism and the realties of a rebellion with only subtle nods to the force were top notch so being PC ain't the problem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigMcGuire
All these shows that fail go and blame the fan base like they are too stupid and can only like one thing. It is in fact the fans that care about the show and continuity, they want things to make sense in the universe created.
👏👏👏 Look what happen when Star Wars made a seemingly minor change to A New Hope. The fan base went into an uproar. Han shot first.😎 Anything else is sacrilege.🧐 That minor change completely altered the character of Han from being an amoral do what you have to to survive nerf herder to a morally superior kill only in self defense nerf herder.😒

This is my litmus test to determine who is a real Star Wars fan or not.

When producers make wholesale changes to a franchise. Well 💩. Fans will notice and they won't like it. Why not introduce new aliens in the New Trek instead of screwing up well established and beloved aliens.🤨 TNG and DS9 introduced a lot of new aliens that flopped. The ones that stuck (Cardassian, Vorta, Jem'Hadar) added to the lore. Come on New Trek, introduce some cat ear aliens.😽
 
👏👏👏 Look what happen when Star Wars made a seemingly minor change to A New Hope. The fan base went into an uproar. Han shot first.😎 Anything else is sacrilege.🧐 That minor change completely altered the character of Han from being an amoral do what you have to to survive nerf herder to a morally superior kill only in self defense nerf herder.😒

This is my litmus test to determine who is a real Star Wars fan or not.

When producers make wholesale changes to a franchise. Well 💩. Fans will notice and they won't like it. Why not introduce new aliens in the New Trek instead of screwing up well established and beloved aliens.🤨 TNG and DS9 introduced a lot of new aliens that flopped. The ones that stuck (Cardassian, Vorta, Jem'Hadar) added to the lore. Come on New Trek, introduce some cat ear aliens.😽
George Lucas was horrible for that. I have I believe Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi in the restored original version that some people did online and it is so much better then all the new updates and expansions they added to it. I really don't care about new aliens, but the interaction between different cultures, especially the main ones they have and the conflict that it can bring.

Personally I think Star Trek has never really been fleshed out well. Money is seemingly not a thing, but there are shops and restaurants. Are we to imagine that everyone does everything for free? Wine, Whiskey, restaurants, all simply because they love it? They also try to imagine the world is so peaceful yet we constantly see corruption in the upper ranks and literally racism when it comes to different alien species. The Federation certainly does not respect the culture of the Ferengis, they are made to be a joke. Could literally rip apart every show and episode and find things that make no sense. Now on the other hand if they actually explored those things, like earth is a sort of utopia while other people starve. Obviously not all planets are doing as well as others. Lots of stories there that could be really good, reflecting our world in this futuristic depiction. I think like most TV shows they simply lack writers and people brave enough to actually write quality stories and not go down the safe path or follow the trends of the day.
 
This idea that fans don't like SFA because they are bigoted or misogynistic is ridiculous. Most of the ST fans grew up with classic trek and embraced the notion of a utopian future that is more equitable and egalitarian. The fans are not the problem.

Just one example. In the famous TOS episode where two men are trying to kill each other, the hatred is so deep. You don't find out until near the end that the source of the hatred was racism based on which side of their face was white or black. It was well written. The acting was terrific. And the source of the racism was unexpected, which made it all the more profound. With SFA, it is incessant virtue signaling and messaging. So, it can't possibly yield something unexpected or profound.
 
Last edited:
If you only make shows that cater to fans of TNG, DS9 and Voyager, what happens as those fans die off? And how many of them are willing to drop ~$150 a year for 10 weekly episodes?

"Prestige Episodic Television" is enormously expensive with each episode running into the tens or even scores of millions of dollars. So a series has to be enormously successful right out of the gate or it will be culled. Even if a series is given two seasons at launch, it will be cancelled before the second season even completes filming if the first season does not become a smash hit, which means even if the second season lands with audiences (Prodigy), well it is too late because everyone has already moved on. While we will never know the true numbers, S3 of Picard could very well have been incredibly popular, but since the decision had been made years earlier that there would not be a fourth season, the production team was already on other projects when S3 aired so they were not available for a fourth season or
a new show like "ST: Legacy".

And it doesn't help when marketing departments pre-pigeon-hole a show before it even airs. How many TNG fans who would have loved Prodigy ignored it because they were told "this is for kids" and plenty of people rejected Academy the moment it was announced because it was "for young adults" and they are long past that time.

Honestly, Star Trek on television (a.k.a. - streaming) probably needs another very long break like we had between TOS and TNG. CBS All Access/Paramount+ needed Star Trek to get people to subscribe. But with Paramount and Discovery merging streaming services, HBO will take care of that. 😛
 
If you only make shows that cater to fans of TNG, DS9 and Voyager, what happens as those fans die off? And how many of them are willing to drop ~$150 a year for 10 weekly episodes?
Well hopefully you've continued world building and storytelling so that newer viewers want to keep watching and keep the story going. Jumping 1000 years into the future and using it as an excuse to do whatever you want with the established lore breaks the whole chain though.

It isn't enough that a teacher and second in command are lesbian lovers? It isn't enough that one of the cadets is nonbinary and vomits rainbow sprinkles? They had to make a member of the Klingon warrior race a gay cross dresser. They are beating this message to death, and it loses impact.
It's not even that they are just beating this to death, it literally breaks the Star Trek formula for exploring progressive ideas and inclusive themes when all you do is overlay the 21st century human version of whatever on the character. The modern Trek shows repeatedly get this wrong by assuming that being alien in appearance is enough to break the stereotypical barrier without any actual alien substance. Trek is most effective at this when the presentation is wrapped in enough 'alieness' that it doesn't immediately trigger someone's preconceptions and forces them to look at their own bigotry through a giant humbling mirror.

A gay Klingon is actually a really interesting concept to explore by itself... never seen one before. What a great opportunity to see a new part of Klingon culture... Oh, his family spent years in denial and trying to force their version of who he was and when it got to the point it couldn't be ignored further they cut him off and abandoned him... He, a Klingon has a fear of public speaking... He has some repressed feelings and issues and through exploration decides he prefers to wear female clothes... Human female clothes, and the school uniform specifically... They named the Klingon "Jay'den..." This isn't any thing alien/Klingon about this Klingon , it's a lazy human generalization poorly disguised as a Klingon.

To be clear, lest people misunderstand, I have no problem with a gay, crossdressing character that has a complicated family situation. I have a problem with them wasting an alien character and the opportunity to try something actually new and explore a topic in a way that creatively moves the needle in the real world. It doesn't have to hit 100% of the time. It's ok if it might require some critical thinking and/or a few rewatches to click. What is doesn't do is instantly polarize everyone watching like an unexpected skinny legged Klingon in a school girl skirt does. One way successfully reached a generation with messages of diversity and inclusion that their meat-based brains could comprehend. The other ignited a fan war that's burning the house down.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigMcGuire
Well hopefully you've continued world building and storytelling so that newer viewers want to keep watching and keep the story going. Jumping 1000 years into the future and using it as an excuse to do whatever you want with the established lore breaks the whole chain though.

They moved the story 1000 years into the future to ensure they did not collide with the established lore, which would have happened if they had stayed (and is happening to some extent with Strange New Worlds because of it "staying behind").
 
Trek is most effective at this when the presentation is wrapped in enough 'alieness' that it doesn't immediately trigger someone's preconceptions and forces them to look at their own bigotry through a giant humbling mirror.
Quark call-out out the Federation hypocrisy is a stellar example of this.
This episode is one of my favorite. The high and mighty Hew-mons got called out for hypocrisy by an alien they look down upon.

I had to reevaluate a lot of my preconceptions. Turns out I have a lot of prejudices.🙁
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.