This is the problem I'm having. Does it reflect positively on our society that, instead of honoring those who dedicate their lives to service without anything in return, we weep for those who dedicate their lives to profit and providing high quality personal devices?
I don't think so.
Zim,
Please provide an example of someone who dedicates their life to service and gets nothing in return. I know of none. If your Christian, even Christ was moving his Fathers plan forward (i.e. He got something).
If your point is there are people that don't appear to be rewarded enough for what they do, then answer this question. What if Steve was? What if Steve was rewarded proportionately to all the change he had been responsible for over the past 30 years?
Your argument, "because Steve ran a company, took care of his family, and made something that impacted people all over the world, he obviously wasn't out for the public good," doesn't seem to match the reality we live in.
I'm thinking about all the family problems Steve was known to have.
You're right, I made that up. It's likely he was no saint, but he never claimed to be one. And I personally don't have a reason to believe he was anything but a wonderful father and husband.
What about all the affairs?
Nope, he was a good example of marital fidelity.
Environmentalism?
Yup, good example, his company, his legacy, leads the way in green efforts.
I know, what about charitable donations?
Appears this would be speculation
Now for the flip side. Walk up to a public servant (Police, Fire, medical, military) and ask them how unhappy they would be to receive a 100% pay increase. How much do you want to bet you wouldn't find anyone that would turn it down?
I get that there are lots of people who aren't properly recognized for what they sacrifice for. Does that mean we need to verbally assail the few that may actually be rewarded proportionately? And especially in a memorial?
Last edited: