Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
My mid-2013 13" i7 1.7Ghz 8GB RAM is hands down the best Mac I have ever owned ... and I've had iMacs, Mac Minis, PowerBooks, and MacBook Pros. It is super light, portable, performant beyond expectations, still has great battery life, boots in about 6 seconds (only occasional reboot anyway), and runs on the latest OS.

It really is the best investment I ever made.
Agreed. I bought a 2013 max-spec Air, and the thing is still rock solid today. In hindsight, it makes me wonder why I upgraded to a 2017 15 inch touch bar MBP
 
I can't tell from the photos what the Sony offered in the way of ports, but if I recall correctly the original first-generation MacBook Air had a charging port, a USB port and a headphone jack. That was it.

Plus a Mini-DVI port, that was changed in the next model to a DisplayPort.
 
Why is the MacBook Air the best Allrounder laptop ever made:

1) the longest battery life with a decent cpu
2) the best non-tiring and quiet Keyboard for extended typing sessions
3) enough ports to interface with most encountered peripherals
4) light enough to not worry about carrying in backpack for a full day
5) classic design that’s defined the ultra portable segment
6) adequate screen for mobile work and DisplayPort for interfacing with up to 4K Color accurate Monitors to satisfy pro photographers
7) current price!

Furthermore, you can renew the battery without needing a heat gun, upgrade the SSD with the 2015+ models enjoying fast PCIe 4x xfer speeds.

It may be Apple’s entry-level model these days but it covers what most average mobile users need.
 
Obsessively thin, under powered, skimpy storage, expensive, and a single USB port. If it were released today, it's the perfect example of what would have people screaming that "Steve never would have done this!"

It was good for what it was. Portable and sufficient for light workloads. The new Macbook is a worthy replacement, with a great retina screen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PickUrPoison
Frankly we shouldn't care about this product because Apple doesn't.

The Original MacBook Air is "obsolete". Apple doesn't support it, and it is vulnerable to Meltdown, Spectre, and KRACK.
 
Apple dropping the price on something? Good one.
Yes, Apple reduces prices. Over just the last 12-15 months there were plenty of price cuts.

1) It is common for Apple to reduce prices for a prior generation product after a new generation is released. iPhones and Apple Watch are easy examples.

2) Sometimes they drop prices to shore up waning demand for a product, even without a new generation having been released. Price cuts to the iPad and iPad Pro in Nov 2016 and the iPad mini 4 last March, for instance. The cuts to the Mac Pro last April are another example that comes to mind.

3) Sometimes costs drop and/or Apple wants to encourage customers to buy a certain option, and will cut the price. For instance, 512GB/1TB SSD upgrades came down a couple hundred dollars in late 2016.

4) Occasionally Apple will cut prices (often temporarily) to increase customer satisfaction, especially after a PR hit. USB-C adapters in Nov 2016 and iPhone battery replacement fee dropping from $79 to $29 last December are obvious examples.

5) Sometimes Apple will re-engineer a product to cut costs, especially to create demand at a new, lower price point. The iPhone SE is a decent example of that, $399 at intro in 2016 and it dropped further to $349 last September. A better example might the $329 2017 9.7” iPad, when previously $499 had been the lowest priced iPad in that form factor.

Rarely, Apple will get new product pricing wrong, but it’s rare to see price cuts due to that. It was over 10 years ago the original iPhone was reduced from $599 to $399, about 8 months after its introduction. I don’t remember a similar price correction recently.

btw AirPods were actually underpriced (another Apple rarity), resulting in a lack of inventory and shipping delays for the better part of a year after their introduction. They ramped supply but demand seemed to continually outpace their forecasts.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Dave245
It seems like Apple's product line was an attempt to fill Steve's needs. He was user #1.

Without him, Apple is lost. Sure they make lots of money, but they've lost their mojo.

The only hope is that it's Apple. It's reinvented itself so many times that it's in Apple's DNA. It just needs someone to take charge.

What ever happened to those Apple University courses that taught Apple's methodology? They should put those on iTunes U so the rest of us can benefit.
 
Best Joke of 2017 goes to Tim Cook, who said they make products to compete. Except if they updated the Macbook air properly, it would destroy that crappy 12 inch macbook with one port.

Long live the macbook air, all hail Steve Jobs!
 
  • Like
Reactions: amegicfox
Frankly we shouldn't care about this product because Apple doesn't.

The Original MacBook Air is "obsolete". Apple doesn't support it, and it is vulnerable to Meltdown, Spectre, and KRACK.
Though the very first MacBook Air can no longer run a supported OS, the 31 subsequent models of the MBA, all the way back to those released in October 2008, are still supported. So I guess we can keep caring about those, if not the original.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yvan256
Waiting for all the “Steve would’ve never allowed this” posts from everyone who didn’t read the article. And not surprisingly, from some who do.
 
It's hilarious how people are praising Steve Jobs today.
Go back to the day the original Macbook Air was announced, the story was different. Many were complaining about the lack of optical drive, ethernet jack, firewire, etc. Worse, there's only 1 single USB2 port that were put inside a hatch, making it difficult for certain plugs. Then there are the overheating complaints and how the laptop throttled down. All these issues are not fixed until Apple redesigned the Macbook Air.

Heck, even on the redesigned second gen, still under Steve Jobs, the first revised Macbook Air (which design is used until today) lacks backlit keyboard and used a core 2 Duo (instead of the core i series).

So I don't get the utter hatred towards Tim Cook today. The only difference is that the it seems Steve Jobs emitted a much much stronger reality distortion field than Cook. The retina Macbook imo is a great spiritual successor of the Macbook Air. And for those complaining about ports, watch again the keynote in the article about the wireless vision that Jobs talked about. Tim Cook only fulfilled what Steve Jobs visioned. The original Macbook Air featured only 1 USB port, hidden in a hatch to streamline the look. Jobs caved to the mass market wanting more ports, so we have the beloved second gen Macbook Air. The retina Macbook only solidified what Jobs started, streamlined look, 1 port.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dave245
I miss Steve :( Steve was the best on stage.
[doublepost=1516091599][/doublepost]
Frankly we shouldn't care about this product because Apple doesn't.

The Original MacBook Air is "obsolete". Apple doesn't support it, and it is vulnerable to Meltdown, Spectre, and KRACK.
Even AMD is vulnerable to Spectre, and just about everything Intel is vulnerable to all of the above. The hardware snafu with Minix and predictive execution is industry-wide. It will affect future hardware design, current hardware performance, and overall marketing of Intel driven products right now on the shelf waiting to be sold. That 8th generation I7 hot laptop is about to go bargain.
[doublepost=1516092380][/doublepost]
[doublepost=1516091599][/doublepost]
Even AMD is vulnerable to Spectre, and just about everything Intel is vulnerable to all of the above. The hardware snafu with Minix and predictive execution is industry-wide. It will affect future hardware design, current hardware performance, and overall marketing of Intel driven products right now on the shelf waiting to be sold. That 8th generation I7 hot laptop is about to go bargain.
A synopsis - Jobs and Gates over the years:

 
My 2014 MBA is still going strong. When it croaks it I’ll have to get the 12 inch MacBook but it’s not a patch on the MBA.
 
It was way ahead of its time and the critics didn't see it, they had no vision. That design with updated internals and screen would fit right into 2018. A textbook presentation and very influential impact on laptop design.
 
  • Like
Reactions: R*E
My mid-2013 13" i7 1.7Ghz 8GB RAM is hands down the best Mac I have ever owned ...
It really is the best investment I ever made.

Still using the mid-2011 13" i7 1.8Ghz (4GB RAM 256GB SSD, max. config.) hooked up to a 24-inch display. Looks like new and battery is absolutely ok for its age. If it wasn't for the RAM limitations and the (now) slow internal graphics, I'd keep it for another two years. Never had a computer that has held up this well.
 
I still love my 3.25 year old MBA but wow, I haven't gotten 12 hours of battery life in a looooooong time. I think I'm lucky to get 6.5 hours, and only if I turn the brightness to below 50% and if I cautiously watch the Activity Monitor! Thinking this will be the plan soon, assuming it will work for my MBA i7 purchased in August 2014.

https://eshop.macsales.com/item/NewerTech/BAP13MBA55/

6.5 hours of real world usage is still pretty good, even compared to the newest macs.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.