Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Here is another one

Another interesting Story

"BuyMusic.com may want to rename itself BuyHeadaches.com until it works out the kinks in its new music downloading service."


"I recorded the songs to a CD, then put the CD into another computer and tried to play them.

Immediately, my Web browser launched and I was taken to BuyMusic.com's site, where I got this message: "A license for the track you are attempting to play cannot be found on your machine. If you have not purchased this track, but would like to do so now, please click here."

No, I don't think so. I think I'm done purchasing, for now anyway
"
 
Originally posted by Sabenth
WTF: This has to be the dumb end of the stick this one . I cant use i Tunes service not in the usa dont know if i can use the buy music site either but i know one thing i wont be using buy .com because to much as far as what i can and cant do with my music choice. i am planing on getting my first ever i pod in a couple of weeks time and its going to store everyting of my music life. i want to be able to put music on it not some digital Music rights law crap on it I DONT WANT TO GO TO LAW SCHOOL JUST SO I CAN LISTEN TO MUSIC.. A month is not a long time in the computing world what a dildo... I TUNES COMES ACROSS as been more pro this buy thing is well cant describe it i need special licnces i can get a car licence quicker ....

... DMR Is a good idea if you want people to keep using Kazza... be my guest...

I don't think, with that kind of eloquence, we need worry at all about you going to law school.

That aside, Buy.com's latest offering is certainly the dung heap that we all hoped it would be.

HOWEVER (and mark me, this is a BIG however),

Windows was also a rather large heap of dung. Yet it sold. And sold. And sold. And here we are, with 3.5% of the market's favorite operating system with, well, 3.5% of the market.

Does anyone else fear that buymusic.com could be the music service analog of the result of the OS wars?

If one can market rubbish well enough, he can sell it. Blum may be able to sell this stuff. The only plus here is that while Windows can get by at performing the minimum necessary tasks in an albeit buggy way, BuyMusic does not nearly accomplish everything that the music buyer would need or want. Moreover, from what everyone is saying, the prices are not nearly as competitive as one would imagine.

Here's another cheery fact. USA Today remarks that the iPod controls approximately 50% of the digital music player market. It would be fair to assume that that constitutes at least 33% Windows users. That would mean that at least 16.6% of the Windows market for buymusic.com is restricted from the service. And I daresay that that 16.6% is the most important...No, not because that cohort uses the best mp3 player (although it does), but because that cohort was willing to spend the MOST MONEY to purchase an mp3 player. It would be logical to predict that those Windows users who purchased iPods would also be most willing to spend money to buy music online.

Then in all likelihood, iTMS has nothing to worry about. But there is a not entirely unreasonable chance that there IS something to worry about. That is the chance that the mass market of easily-duped consumers will succumb to the foolish enticements of a high-volume marketing scheme. It is the chance that by repeatedly seeing BuyMusic.com's name more than that of iTMS, the lot of consumers will march like lemmings to a nonsensical DRM at an exorbitant price...

And if that happens, the only defense is to release iTMS for Windows fast and market it faster.
 
I was thinking, yeah..fine copy Apple's Music Store strategy.. but can't you leave the ads alone!!!!!

The even went as far as to say that it was "Music for the rest of us!" I cringed... that's just low...
 
*bump*

I wonder if there are any news on how BuyMusic is doing, it would be fun to see how many ( or few :D ) is using the service.
 
Originally posted by Dahl
*bump*

I wonder if there are any news on how BuyMusic is doing, it would be fun to see how many ( or few :D ) is using the service.

Taking a quick search through Google, I didn't really see any positive comments, here's a sample:

"I can't get music that I downloaded from buymusic.com to
to insert into powerpoint. The files are wma. I probably
need to convert the files but I don't know how to do that."


"I'm having trouble transferring WMA files that I've
bought on BuyMusic.com to my IRiver Portable devise. From
the "Cool Devises" page on this site, it looks like my
player is supported, yet I can not get Windows Media
Player to reconize it. I was thinking that it was a
driver, but I have the most up-to-date driver from IRiver."

"Anyone have any ideas on how to get this to work with
Windows Media Player 9.0? I purchased music from
buymusic.com and you can only transfer it to a portable
device by using WMP 9.0. Any ideas or am I hosed?"
 
Well, I finally dug in and managed to download the BuyMusic commercials so I could watch them. (I don't have Windows Media Player on my computer, and I certainly don't want a WMP plug-in messing with my browser.) So, checking the page source I got the direct url to the wmv files for the commercials. Once downloaded, I watched them in VLC.

ACK! Not only are they rip offs (which I already knew), they are terribly done rip offs! I found myself cringing and wanting to look away while the commercials were playing. I only just managed to make myself watch them all the way through. Ugh!

Just for comparison, I went over to Apple's site and watched the iTMS commercials again. Though there are things that I don't particularly like about them, they have a sense of class to them, and at no point did I feel like I wanted to look away.

If this is the best BuyMusic has to offer in the way of advertizing, from my standpoint, at least, iTMS is quite safe...
 
This is entirly speculation, but here goes.

I think that the music-sites that have the least heavyhanded DRM issues will in the long run be the most profitable. There are some obvious reasons, but I think this one is an important issue.

The lack of (or limited) ability to burn to cd is bound to piss off people that sell audio cd players and receivers, etc. I think that Apple got the good deal that they did because they got in touch with Harmaon/Kardon, (with whom they've been in bed for years now) Sony, and everybody else that sells serious audio equipment and said "Look, peeps, you've got to lobby for us to the RIAA in order to secure a profit from our service" I think that they went along, and hence, Apple got a better deal than everybody else because they were the first. Just an Idea folks. go easy on me.
 
Originally posted by Phil Of Mac
Sony IS a music label.

Does that mean that they would want to license the music that they distribute to companies that are guaranteed to not generate sales for their hardware?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.