Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The picture in the main post was only taken about 13 years ago.

I can't be the only one who finds this remarkable.

Even as much as he and the talented team at Apple planned ahead, I can't help but be saddened at the realization that Steve is no longer there to provide his unique insights.
 
I hope and pray every day that we forget about this 4 year date because even after this period of 4 years, if the experience of apple products doesn't change enough that we notice, we will know that apple will forever and always be there. I'm so terribly afraid that after steve's ideas are all implemented, apple may lose direction, but I pray each day that we can't tell where steve's plans leave off because it would mean apple continues to hold up the tradition of excellence. :apple:

As great as Steve Jobs was, every product Apple made was a group effort. Moreover, Jobs created an atmosphere at Apple that fostered innovation. A rarity in the cookie cutter, bean counting MBA branded executives in the tech industry. So Apple will do just fine going forward. And in some respects, may do even better. I say this with all due respect, but on a few things, Mr. Jobs likely got in the way. I believe Apple will begin to branch out even more by incorporating features in their products that minimize the compromises* some consumer must make when buying Apple products. Apple products won't just be the best, but will have the best of all worlds.


*Apple doesn't always have all the broad market features available. Buying Apple products means missing out on certain features, connectors or compatibilities. If you only buy and use Apple products, you may not realize this as everything Apple makes works perfectly together. But once you start buying non-Apple products, you begin to realize what is missing.
 
Any company in this industry is going to be spending on R&D, and have products in testing and a "future plan". Apple will probably have been testing Ivy Bridge macs for ages. Because stuff like that takes time to get right.

I reckon Jobs, up until now, has had incredible influence over the exacting detail and features of Apple's products. Apple might know what to do and when to do it, but the question is will it be "Steve perfect" - and will Apple be able to sell it as well as Jobs could on the keynote stage.
 
http://curiouscapitalist.blogs.time...the-businessman-can-apple-thrive-without-him/

Steve Jobs the businessman: Can Apple thrive without him?

As Apple fans mourn the unfortunate loss of Steve Jobs, the great innovator will be remembered most of all for how his ideas changed people's lives. But in the world of business, he will also be honored as an absolutely brilliant CEO. Jobs possessed the rare ability to link emerging technologies with consumer habits and tastes in a way that built a powerful corporation and an internationally beloved brand. There aren't that many people in modern corporate history who can claim that skill. In fact, Jobs was probably unrivaled in the world today in matching great ideas with savvy marketing and pristine execution. And that's why there is reason for uncertainty about Apple's future.

The question is: Can Apple keep the Steve Jobs spirit without Steve Jobs?

There is a long history, of course, of entrepreneurial companies not only surviving their charismatic founders, but thriving after they passed on. Ford did just fine after the death of Henry; Disney is still a force in entertainment long after Walt. Apple will remain a major player in the world of computing and electronics without Steve. The firm is simply too established, too much a part of a consumer's life, to just wither away, even with the exit of a towering figure like Jobs.

But the question remains if Apple can continue to be an industry leader as it has routinely been under Jobs. Can Apple keep its edge? Apple's success has always been based on being first, by solving problems others thought unsolvable, and introducing products that changed how people worked, played and communicated. It is not easy for any company to continue to produce innovative hit after innovative hit, even with its visionary leader still in the corner office. It will be even harder for Apple with Jobs gone. That isn't to say that current CEO Tim Cook can't get the job done. But Jobs is just a very hard act to follow.

The future facing Apple makes me think of another electronics giant, Japan's Sony. Sony was Apple before Apple, the great global innovator that produced products that changed people's lives, again and again. Sony, remember, championed the idea of personalized electronics – not the giant radio in the living room, but the miniature transistor radio, or the portable TV set. Sony invented the Walkman, altering forever how people listened to music, in the same way the iPod has in more recent times. Sony, like Apple, was a company that thrived on new ideas, new technologies, and an engaging brand.

And just like Apple, Sony was propelled forward by personality – well, two personalities, in fact – co-founders Akio Morita and Masaru Ibuka. The two of them were behind everything Sony did, much like Jobs at Apple. They were unique visionaries, with a unique talent of bringing technology to the masses. And in the process, much like Jobs, they built an international company with an unrivaled brand.

Sony is still one of the industry's titans today, long after Morita and Ibuka have left the scene. The Japanese firm continues to make high-quality consumer electronics under one of the most trusted brands in the world. But no one would say Sony is the influential innovator it used to be. Apple took its place as the game changer of the electronics world. Up-and-coming companies like Samsung have eaten away at its global presence in key businesses, like televisions. Sure, the company has been managed by some talented people, but Morita and Ibuka were just too hard to replace. Sony has never been quite the same without them.

Will Apple suffer the same fate? It is impossible to tell. Yet Sony offers a cautionary tale. I was in Tokyo conducting some research on Sony a few years ago and had the pleasure of interviewing Yotaro Kobayashi, a long-time friend of Akio Morita. He believed that Sony struggled because its modern-day managers kept trying to recapture the old Morita-Ibuka spirit to guide the company to its future. But, Kobayashi believed, that was not possible. There was only one Morita and one Ibuka.

Just like there is only one Steve Jobs.

Kobayashi's point was that Sony had to grow beyond its dynamic founders and find a new future in order to maintain its greatness. Sony had to stop looking backwards to an age it couldn't recreate and instead look forwards.

That may be sound advice for Apple today.

348_sony.jpg
images

images


Morita and Ibuka both died back in the late-1990's. And look what has happened to Sony ever since.
 
I hope one of these plans is a full-fledged 50-inch Apple Cinema TV screen I can hang on my wall....

If Steve had thought that Apple should go into the razor thin margin arena of consumer TVs - they'd already be selling them.

This one isn't going to happen.

The "hobby" of Apple TV, however, could hold promise. Let Samsung, LG, Sony and the others make the screens. Produce the box that provides content for those screens - and try to steer consumers to buy content from Apple.

Apple's product model (1 to 3 items) just won't work in this space. 50" will be too large for some, too small for others. I can't see Apple doing a range of 27" to 70" LCD screens, just can't.

But whether the consumer buys a 27" or 70" - she can connect an Apple TV to it and Apple can sell her content.

Just put a frackin' BD drive in the Apple TV, and it will "fly off the shelves like hotcakes"™.
 
This does not seem too surprising, he has shown for much longer than 4 years that he was ahead of his time. The interesting point will be 4-10 years from now, to see if Apple can continue and continues to be as visionary as they have been. It's definitely possible, but highlighting his importance is a double-edged sword. If he was THE mastermind, then there is a problem for apple. If they have a great team either way, then maybe not. It is hard to really play up the importance of one without slightly downgrading the other
 
How can he predict four years into the future? I mean, Steve Jobs was totally brilliant, but who knows where technology will go in that time?

+1

The technologies available in 4 years would be hard for us to believe today.

4 years ago the Iphone 1G was just establishing itself.

If the turtlenecked one left a 4 year roadmap, y'all should hope for Apple's sake that MBA Tim et al feel free to use it as a general guide to product directions to be adapted to the market and technology. If it's taken as a rigid plan, it will be as successful (NOT!) as the Soviet 5-year plans.

To paraphrase the too-often quoted line attributed to Henry Ford - you don't want Apple to spend its time breeding faster horses.
 
If Steve had thought that Apple should go into the razor thin margin arena of consumer TVs - they'd already be selling them.

This one isn't going to happen.

The "hobby" of Apple TV, however, could hold promise. Let Samsung, LG, Sony and the others make the screens. Produce the box that provides content for those screens - and try to steer consumers to buy content from Apple.

Apple's product model (1 to 3 items) just won't work in this space. 50" will be too large for some, too small for others. I can't see Apple doing a range of 27" to 70" LCD screens, just can't.

But whether the consumer buys a 27" or 70" - she can connect an Apple TV to it and Apple can sell her content.

Just put a frackin' BD drive in the Apple TV, and it will "fly off the shelves like hotcakes"™.

I realize it seems pie-in-the-sky, but I'm betting few ever saw Apple becoming a huge player in the smart phone market.

I'm seeing Internet connected TVs right and left these days. Web-based and wireless, with streaming and built-in apps, these TVs are becoming the norm in the high-end market. It seems silly that there isn't a dedicated iTunes/iOS-based television.

I would doubt that Apple would have multiple screen sizes. They would probably look for the ideal size and stick with it. Think of the 3.5 inch iPhone screen (no 4inch screen in sight this week), or the 10-inch iPad screen. Maybe, like the iMac, they'll offer 2 sizes. Is the "ideal" screen 47 inches? 50? 55? They'll find the perfect ratio and diagonal measurement.

Between my phone, music player, desktop, laptop, and tablet, my television is really the last and only screen in my house that doesn't come from Apple!
 
Here I thought the iphone 4S was his last work on smartphones, and because Sprint screwed their old customers over, i was in fear I wouldnt get to enjoy his last work, but to hear he has his hands on the future iphone models after the 4S makes me feel better, and cant wait for the next one to come. R.I.P steve jobs you will be missed.
 
Integrate a TV with Siri and you create a whole new category of Internet TVs. Pretty useful too. Lose the remote and complete interactivity. I'd buy one.
 
http://curiouscapitalist.blogs.time...the-businessman-can-apple-thrive-without-him/



ImageImage
Image

Morita and Ibuka both died back in the late-1990's. And look what has happened to Sony ever since.


i've noticed that a lot of asian companies thrive when the market is building commodity products around a common standard

when its building ecosystems like apple, microsoft, google, amazon and a few others have done the asians can't hack it. as electronics get more complex expect US companies to flourish and asians to be left with table scraps

----------

If Steve had thought that Apple should go into the razor thin margin arena of consumer TVs - they'd already be selling them.

This one isn't going to happen.

The "hobby" of Apple TV, however, could hold promise. Let Samsung, LG, Sony and the others make the screens. Produce the box that provides content for those screens - and try to steer consumers to buy content from Apple.

Apple's product model (1 to 3 items) just won't work in this space. 50" will be too large for some, too small for others. I can't see Apple doing a range of 27" to 70" LCD screens, just can't.

But whether the consumer buys a 27" or 70" - she can connect an Apple TV to it and Apple can sell her content.

Just put a frackin' BD drive in the Apple TV, and it will "fly off the shelves like hotcakes"™.

apple TV is going to be a killer product in the years to come. combined with idevices it's going to be a huge game console/home entertainment hub
 
If Steve had thought that Apple should go into the razor thin margin arena of consumer TVs - they'd already be selling them.

This one isn't going to happen.

The "hobby" of Apple TV, however, could hold promise. Let Samsung, LG, Sony and the others make the screens. Produce the box that provides content for those screens - and try to steer consumers to buy content from Apple.

Apple's product model (1 to 3 items) just won't work in this space. 50" will be too large for some, too small for others. I can't see Apple doing a range of 27" to 70" LCD screens, just can't.

But whether the consumer buys a 27" or 70" - she can connect an Apple TV to it and Apple can sell her content.

Just put a frackin' BD drive in the Apple TV, and it will "fly off the shelves like hotcakes"™.

Apple is in many "razor thin" margin markets. Most mobile phone companies loose money. Most PC companies have 5% margins on 500 dollar PCs. Somehow people are prepared to pay more for excellent design, quality and unique features.

Apple will release an Apple branded TV.
The patents lock genius and will revolutionize how we look at TV. Look at the patents if you are interested.

Apple also have an unique position that they can provide content to their TVs. Technically it could mean that Apple released an retina/4K TV before a "standard" is set.

Apple could easily be the new "netflix" or Hulu and bypass the cable companies. Why pay cable companies hundreds of dollars if you can get the same content cheaper and on demand from Apple?
 
What a selfless man. Yes, he is making an attempt to protect his legacy, but a selfless attempt to protect his baby after he is gone.

Steve Jobs knew better than to foolishly think that he could still control his company after he had gone. What he did here then is attempt to help and protect his baby, Apple, the best he could. Like it was one of his own children.

This man worked so hard through his life that even with only mere weeks left, he never wavered, lost faith, relaxed, gave up.

Not to be cheesy, but I am reminded of all of the Under Armor commercials where they say, "We will protect this house". This man will go down in history.

Steve, you truly put a dent in the Universe.
 
i've noticed that a lot of asian companies thrive when the market is building commodity products around a common standard

when its building ecosystems like apple, microsoft, google, amazon and a few others have done the asians can't hack it. as electronics get more complex expect US companies to flourish and asians to be left with table scraps

----------



apple TV is going to be a killer product in the years to come. combined with idevices it's going to be a huge game console/home entertainment hub

Asian culture is different.
Almost all Korean companies are OEM companies. They have started as cheap factories/component builders for western companies.

For example HTC. Ericsson and other phone companies OEMed phones to them in the late 1990is.
HTC then figured out that they could use the same design and release their own phones.

Samsung: Makes many parts for Apple product. They figure out that they can use same parts and release their own products.

These companies need someone to copy/lead them. Microsoft/Google/Apple.

This is one of the reason why outsourcing from your home country is idiotic. When you let your other manufacture your stuff, nothing stops them from manufacture the same stuff.

Apple has a huge problem with this. Pirated Apple parts are manufactures at the same plant that manufacture original Apple parts.

It is interesting that Apple is moving more of the design in-house like A class processors. This give Apple a huge cost advantage against other ARM competitors. Apple can have a 30% larger SoC for the same price as a produced ARM chip like Tegra2. This 30% gives Apple a huge edge since they can put DSP/SIMD and other function into their processor.

Since Apple control the graphic layer of the OS, Apple can accelerate it with SIMD and visual engine. Something that for example Android can't do, since Google does not control the graphic layer.

My dream is that Apple buys/builds its own foundry and factories. That would hamper the copycats and enable Apple to produce products more cheaply.
 
Apple is in many "razor thin" margin markets. Most mobile phone companies loose money. Most PC companies have 5% margins on 500 dollar PCs. Somehow people are prepared to pay more for excellent design, quality and unique features.

Apple will release an Apple branded TV.
The patents lock genius and will revolutionize how we look at TV. Look at the patents if you are interested.

Apple also have an unique position that they can provide content to their TVs. Technically it could mean that Apple released an retina/4K TV before a "standard" is set.

Apple could easily be the new "netflix" or Hulu and bypass the cable companies. Why pay cable companies hundreds of dollars if you can get the same content cheaper and on demand from Apple?


I was with Aiden until the BluRay remark. But you make some good points.
Actually Steve won't be making this decision. You'll have to ask Tim about his feelings on this.


Just put a frackin' BD drive in the Apple TV, and it will "fly off the shelves like hotcakes"™.

Actually, hot cakes have razor thin margins too. Food for thought.
 
Since the whole PowerPC debacle forcing them to hop over to Intel, Apple will only release a product if they know they can release a better version whenever necessary.

Also, since Time Machine & iCloud are just only Steve Jobs' ideas of a good computer anno '96*, you bet he had some nice ideas since then. I do hope though that Apple won't be some kind of Steve-Jobs-mausoleum-company.

* See Apple WWDC '97 Closing Keynote
 
I knew he did this! I had so much faith in him doing that because of how much he cares. It's like when the iphone came out. He practiced on the iphone for the ipad. The man knew what he was doing. :)
 
Apple also have an unique position that they can provide content to their TVs. Technically it could mean that Apple released an retina/4K TV before a "standard" is set.

Apple could easily be the new "netflix" or Hulu and bypass the cable companies. Why pay cable companies hundreds of dollars if you can get the same content cheaper and on demand from Apple?

First of all, Apple doesn't own a cable company. Second, the only possibility of streaming super HDTV is through fiber optic and very little of that has been laid so far. There is literally no point of releasing a super HDTV right now.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.