Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Bring it on.

The television is the only screen in my house not of Apple design; it seems like it should be the centerpiece surrounded by my iMac, MacBook, iPad, iPod and iPhone.

Most newer high-end TVs are Internet capable, complete with apps. No reason Apple shouldn't be able to enter this market, with the most and best apps. Add full-scale Safari, iCloud, and Siri voice control and Apple fans will pawn the family jewels to buy it.

I don't see a screen size less than 42"; my guess is the they would go for the 50"=55" screen size sweet spot.
 
Makes me wonder if Apple could accomplish the same with ATV without the display. Not sure if a TV set is what will revolutionize but the software to bring content in a new and unexpected way. This is where I think Apple can be king.
As for the television set itself is not necessary imo.
 
Enough with the spoilers about the biography, I want to read the book!

These posts should have an alert before them, so people can skip them. It seems I'm going to have to restrain myself of macrumors until I've read the book in a couple of days! :p
 
Not sure how useful a tv is going to be since I've converted to projection. Once you see 100" you'll never go back. :) The only thing I can envision being useful to me would be a combination of Apple TV & a DVR. As long as it can play mkv files I'm in. I'm sick of TiVo although it is a great idea. Too many ads, slow interface, bugs, networking capabilities not great.
 
Who will built them, Samsung, Sony or LG?

It would be interesting too see what sizes are being considered. Imagine having to shlep a 50+ inch tv through the mall to have a "genius" look at it.

I have a 54" inch tv, luckily Panasonic provides in house warranty service for my set.
 
A souped-up Apple TV could do all of these things. Stream movies(DVD/BluRay gone), play iOS games (Xbox/PS3/Wii gone), Stream TV shows (Cable/Sat gone). The trick is to get the studios to play along and charge something less than what Cable/Sat charge.

Joke post?
So to stream movies I have to not watch the 1080p/24 7.1 bluray films I have and instead watch heavily compressed 720p versions that need repurchasing? I love quality media, so I opt for bluray.

iOS games over Xbox, PS3 and Wii games?

Streaming TV? I'd drop my sky box if they hadn't buggered up my bill for the better ;). But I personally don't need streaming TV, YMMV.
 
Not sure where Jobs is from...but in the past 20 years lived in 2 States and used multiple cable services. NONE came with complex remotes for me to change the channel...and NONE of my dvd/bluray units have complex remotes for me to watch my movie.

Are there too many buttons on 99% of ALL remote controls? Yes. But until the world of TV is completely menu driven on-screen, the buttons will remain.

I'm a huge a/v geek and I've very very rarely used the remotes to do complex stuff like audio setup or settings of my tv.

Apple is right that the whole cable industry is extremely complex, very much a monopoly, and nobody gets "in" unless they agree to play by all the rules. Someone like Apple/Jobs who wants to turn the tv world upside down will/would not ever be allowed "in". Everyone thought 10+ years ago that Tivo was going to finally change the tv world and all it did was allow you to watch shows at a later time. Great...but it just didn't crack the egg. Nor did/does all the blurary players of the past 4 years with the built-in apps like Netflix and MLB.TV.

The cable nightmare needs to be broken up by the government. I'm sick of the high prices, the useless/extra hardware, and the we-won't-commit-to-anything service attitude.
 
I'll just leave this here:

TL;DR:
50 inch iPad, called the "iTV", hand-in-the-air gesture-based input, 4K retina display, instant-on, runs iOS apps, videogames similar to XBox Kinect, sells for $999 unsubsidized but $699-ish subsidized by Comcast, no way to plug in any cable/satellite, content comes from cloud-based iTunes, subscription to Comcast guarentees quality internet connection and access to all the TV channels, fonts and webcontent resize based on distance you're sitting at, uses face recognition to tell if a visually impaired person is watching iTV and accordingly adjust font size and inverts the colors, voice recogntion of spoken letters obviates the need for a keyboard when typing in a URL, can run for 12 hours off of internal Li+ ion battery for setting up a presentation on-the-go, and more

So I'm gonna lay it all out right here. I'll say up front that I have no inside information at all; the purpose of this post is to be able to point back at this in 2012 and say "See, I can predict the future". Note the timestamp on this post.

The future:
-In January 2012, Apple will announce the iTV, their true television effort. Apple TV will be discontinued. Apple couldn't care less about any outstanding trademarks for the name.
-iTV is essentially a "big iPad", comes in two models: 50 inch and 37 inch.
-iTV is about as thin as today's iPad. It's less than half an inch.
-Resolution is "retina display" resolution such that when viewed even as close as 3 feet away, pixels cannot be discerned. 4K resolution (or more, or less. I'm too lazy to do the math).
-iTV will not accept any sort of cable or satellite connection. That's not the point. Apple is offering you a better alternative to your cable and satellite TV.
-Content will be offered by an iTunes subscription plan, which is $29.99 a month.
-TV shows and movies will stream live at 720p or 1080p, but when downloaded and cached it will playback at full 4K resolution. An industry first.
-iTV will run iOS apps. At this point, iOS will be resolution independent to allow for intelligent scaling to this 4K-ish resolution. But HIG guidelines will advise developers to rewrite their apps to fit the iTV experience.
-Input will not be based not on keyboard, mouse, nor trackpad. And nor will it be based on touch. Apple introduces touchless user input, another industry first.
-To skim through TV channels, put your hand in the air and wag it left and right. Then make a "stop" gesture (like a crossing-guard) to stop on HBO. Wag a couple fingers up and down to scroll through the TV shows offered by HBO, until you reach Curb Your Enthusiasm and make anoter "stop" gesture. Point at the TV or speak the word "play", and playback begins.
-iTV discerns voice commands from regular conversation by recognizing the users' faces, and establishing a "lock" on who is watching iTV by paying attention to the users eyes and facial orientation. When a user wants to make a voice command, a simple gesture like raising a finger (similar to "oh, excuse me, waiter?") before speaking the command.
-iTV costs $699 for the 37 inch model, and $999 for the 50 inch model. Why so cheap? Because it's "just a big iPad", and Apple has perfected the manufacturing process of iPads by 2012. Frankly, the thing will only cost $200 or $300 to make. Big-ass margins.
-People will buy the iTV to watch TV, but it's the web browsing and iOS apps that will keep them hooked. The media will call it "Minority Report on your TV". Search maps, browse photos, call up Yelp, etc. You know the drill.
-Web browsing will actually be made usable on a 50 inch screen 12 feet away by a unique font resizing algorithm invented by Apple. Since iTV is keeping track of faces and eyes, it'll smoothly resize the web page's font to a size that is considered readable at the distance the primary user is sitting. If the user gets up and walks toward iTV, the font will be resized accordingly, as well as the rest of the page. Think of double-tap to zoom in Mobile Safari, but applied to web content on a big screen that is far away. Another industry first.
-You don't need a keyboard to type URLs into iTV's Safari because you can just say the letters. For example, say "C-N-N-dawt-com...go" and CNN's site will load. Unfortunately, voice recognition in 2012 will only be advanced enough to perfectly understand letters well enough to be considered idiot-proof. Apple may still attempt to have iTV recognize spoken whole words, such as the name of TV shows at the very least.
-Members of the family with poor vision will be noted by iTV and facially recognized. Their baseline font size will be a little bigger to compensate for poor vision. And color-inversion for severely impaired vision. All scaling/switching on the fly via face recognition. Industry first.
-Video games. At 4K resolution. Will be controllerless, nearly exactly aping the XBox Kinect technology. Hardcore gamers will bitch, but casual gamers will flip out and love the fact that no extra video game console is required, the graphics are amazing, and no need for controllers or remotes. Apple will become a leader in the "console" gaming industry overnight, similar to it's current success in mobile gaming.
-Since iTV is "just a big iPad", when you turn on the television it's instant on because you're just waking the display. Instant-on just like the iPad.
-And since it's "just a big iPad", it'll actually run unplugged from a power source. The battery life is about 12 hours, enough to prop the thing up on a stand and use it to give big-ass presentations, with "Minority Report" gestures, at an expo or other public situations.
-By 2012, hopefully Apple has gotten it's **** together and made iTunes cloud-based. Buy once, play anywhere. Apple recommends plugging iTV into the internet via ethernet cable.
-Of course, if you're doing stuff on the iPad or iPhone, you can optionally beam content to iTV, similar to Intel's WiDi technology today that lets you stream your laptop's display wireless to your television for the purpose of watching internet video. iPad and iPhone can also be used as input for typing in URLs into iTV's Safari, but Apple will emphasize that peripherals are not needed for using iTV.

Bonus Prediction-Since iTV is a real bits-guzzler, Apple will negotiate a deal with Comcast (of all companies). Comcast will guarentee each subscriber a minimum threshold of internet connection quality so that streamed content doesn't look like crap. Plus Comcast will act as a go-between for Apple and the studios/networks. Since HBO is comfortable working with Comcast (but not with Apple), Comcast acts as the middle man so that Apple can finally have everybody's favorite TV shows. This finally solves the main problem of Apple TV today, namely the lack of breadth of content. This also subsidizes the cost of iTV so that the final price is $499 for 37 inch and $699 for the 50 inch. No I'm not kidding, yes I do honestly believe these subsidized price points are doable, yes these things will sell like hotcakes. Similar to AT&T today, Comcast will become everyone's favorite new whipping boy and will be the weakest part of the iTV experience since Comcast is out of Apple's direct control.

edit: forgot to add - some sort of wireless protocol, like Bluetooth 3.0 (or something that Apple home-brews) to allow for third-party wireless speakers. [Apple will make speakers too, but they'll be junky and overpriced.]

Original post: https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/977034/

Did you notice how a year and a half ago I totally predicted Siri, AirPlay, and iTunes in the Cloud? That stuff wasn't even rumored back then. :)

We'll see if my predictions for iTV come true too. Check back Summer next year.

(the only prediction I regret making is Apple partnering with a cable company like Comcast. That'll never happen. And resolution independence too, Apple will never do that.)
 
^ if you think there is the remotest chance that a consumer 4K resolution 50" screen will be $999 in 2012 you are very much mistaken..... And by a wide margin.







Could he have not just meant appleTV ? As opposed to an Apple TV ?
 
Apple TV wishlist

Content
1. All channels carried.
2. Internet video providers, yes including Netflix and similar.
3. Intuitive programming navigation and search, with active preview window.
4. ALL channels buffered to cloud, to beginning of current or recently finished program at least - for play, rewind, save.
5. Support for internet content over video and/or windowed and/or on second display (like iPad). Should include translation of program dispalyed web addresses, social networking IDs, email, street addresses, to active links for save or launching appropriate application.
6. Game Center (big one, but will leave to your imagination).
7. "Watch anywhere".
8. FaceTime - and btw might need to think about supporting "unified" FaceTime, iPhone #, iPad, and even home phone call invoked if incoming caller has a FaceTime supporting device (like Apple TV or iPad). All configurable per user.
9. Browse everything web if you really want to.

Hardware
1. Fully range of current Apple display technologies...and then some.
2. I think some subset of above features will continue to be developed on current Apple TV platform, with full feature set requiring fully integrated, Apple television Product.
3. Integration with no doubt ingenious user interface device or two for navigation and gaming.
4. Everying else Apple via AirPlay.
 
Profit margins are so low in the flat screen TV market that Apple would have to really add a lot of value to the device to justify the premium they would inevitably charge for it. Look at the Bose Videowave TV, that's only 46 inches and it's over $5k, and it's not even a very high quality TV. Take a Cinema Display and supersize it, put the :apple:TV inside the unit and some other magic ingredient? I don't see how this would compete well when there are so many other choices, they would have to bring something that made it the best of the best in order to not get lost in the sea of other TVs.

You're not thinking it through. If the device integrates iphone, ipod, itunes, icloud, etc, into the TV... what does that do to their collective sales? It's pretty easy to see what their goal is.

Bose is known for making overpriced stuff.
 
The utter lack of imagination shown by some in this thread is amazing. We're talking about Steve Jobs here. He thought about this for years. You think he didn't consider every objection that's been mentioned in this thread and more?

He was a man, not a deity as his untimely death proves. He also thought about the iPhone for years and he ignored the request for third party apps on the device - unable to see how much of a game changer that would end up being.
He made mistakes and poor choices at times like any human, do not think of him as some higher being who had reached technophoric enlightenment, he was a genius, but one who had his flaws like every man, woman & child has...
 
Bring it Apple.
I hate the circus that the current TV/Cable providers have going on right now.
 
If it involves iTunes and/or iTunes pricing, he cracked nothing.
Very true, also...



Not unless he sorts out those Licencing deals worldwide.

Most countries with iTunes outside of USA/Canada have very limited content (no tv shows etc...) a TV set without content is not going to change anything....
 
Cracked code = Siri

Wonder if it is based on using Siri too? No more remote with a ton of buttons, optional voice interface? Display anything on your ipod/ipad/iphone, imac, icloud, and do everything a regular tv does with broadcast tv....

Exactly!
 
The utter lack of imagination shown by some in this thread is amazing. We're talking about Steve Jobs here. He thought about this for years. You think he didn't consider every objection that's been mentioned in this thread and more?

he also had some duds. the Mac cube thing? the list of duds at apple is pretty long with a lot of them under SJ. he's just smart enough to kill of bad products right away

----------

I'll just leave this here:



Original post: https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/977034/

Did you notice how a year and a half ago I totally predicted Siri, AirPlay, and iTunes in the Cloud? That stuff wasn't even rumored back then. :)

We'll see if my predictions for iTV come true too. Check back Summer next year.

(the only prediction I regret making is Apple partnering with a cable company like Comcast. That'll never happen. And resolution independence too, Apple will never do that.)

how would i play my blu ray's on this?
 
That's very interesting... and this is obviously relatedly recent, with the references to iCloud.

My only concern is that, like the apple tv, you'll basically only be able to play iTunes content and streaming services, and you won't be able to play your own files (avi, mkv, and other formats). In fact, I have yet to find a good media player that plays ALL video formats. I mean, really, is it that hard?? If VLC can do it, I don't see why hardware developers have such a hard time. Guess I'll just have to get a mac mini as an HTPC :)

Still, although I'm sure it'll have some annoying limitations, I'd love to see a tv made by apple...!
 
In fact, I have yet to find a good media player that plays ALL video formats.
Any particular format thats been a problem? I could imagine WebM lacking support, but I can't think of other issues (or softsub issues) with any even moderately modern playback box.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.