Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I'm sure he does, but so what if he doesn't??? Anyway, how many billions has the government taken from him in the name of charity?

Right.What he does with is money is nobody's damn business.Love to know what percentage the haters that come out every time is money is mentioned give themselves.
The amount Gates gives will never make up for the frustration and lost productivity is crap operating system.Maybe Jobs has less guilt to assuage.
 
This just in: Steve Jobs is a greedy ass hole.

This just in, Steve Jobs works hard and has made Apple the most successful IT company on the planet. Just cause he works hard and earns money for doing so, no reason to be jealous. He gives hundreds of millions a year to charity, just doesn't talk about in the press to score "brownie points" with the public.
 
Yes, that is what Warren Buffet did, if I recall correctly. He reasonably surmised that he was excellent at investing his money to get good returns, therefore he should get the good returns whilst he could before he gave the money to charity (I think he is donating to the B&MGF).

If you took all people with personal wealth over $5b, and did a one-off tax of 25% of wealth between $5b and $10b, and 50% over that, you would have a one-off tax income of $150b, but only affect 57 people. Lower the former boundary to $1b however, and the receipts would be far higher, yet you would still affect under 400 people. You could run the US military for a few months on that! (puts it into perspective, eh?)

Plus-you could only do it once!Nobody's going to work if the bulk of their compensation is confiscated.
 
I'll almost bet even money that Jobs has a surprisingly LOW income tax bill. Why? Because by NOT drawing big salaries from Apple and Disney and (probably) much of his personal wealth invested in tax-free and tax-deferred investments, that means he won't pay a lot in taxes up-front every April 15th. :)
 
Personally, I don't see how someone of that wealth could not give back. If you have $6 billion, you could give away $5 billion and still have enough for 100 lifetimes.

He could do that, he could give it all away, and it wouldn't matter. We would not remember him for his generosity. He's still here, but when he's gone, we know what we'll remember him for... his contributions to the personal computer, his unbending vision of how we should best interact with them.

Give a man a fish, he eats for a day. Give a man a river, and he drowns.
 
Apple is his charity. That is what he believes in. His money is in Apple and Disney. His wife does donate to the Democratic party and some non-profits though.

I don't understand the point of the random college dropout line at the end. Are they trying to sensationalize the paragraph or throw in some unrelated jab at the US educational system?

Yeah, it's a jab. But the reality that you can take from it is that anyone can succeed if you're good at it. Love or hate Steve, he's good at what he does and he's proved that over and over.
 
$59 Billion. One guy. *sigh*

One guy with visions that have helped transform the modern world multiple times. Think about all the concepts and new realities SJ has introduced to the world these past 30+ years and where we might be w/o them.

Dare I say w/o Mac OS Windows 7 might look a lot more like DOS 5 and people would be a lot less productive than they now are able to be -- productivity being a cornerstone of economic growth. Steve is reaping his just rewards for his work. If you have a societal changing concept, develop it and you'll get your billions too. The thing is those types of people, just like billionaires, are uncommon.
 
Good for Steve, Bill and all the billionaires in this country. Complaining about someone not giving to charity? Those who live in glass houses should not throw stones. People bitching about wealthy individuals are usually just jealous and to lazy to make their own. Stop complaining and go do something about it. I'm happy to see American companies doing well and those who founded those companies rewarded for (in this case) bring us all the advances in technology. Love em or hate em, Jobs and Gates have impacted all our lives. Ok so Windows may not be always in a positive manner lol, but still.

Doesn't matter if you make $5,000 a year or $5 million, you can give to charity. If I was a betting man, I would guess 99% of the people complaining don't give $h/ t to charity. Always looking for a hand out, what in it for me, OMG that app is $.99 cents!! I'll just go torrent that movie... Ya welcome to the "me" generation. Thank god their are innovators in this world.
 
This just in, Steve Jobs works hard and has made Apple the most successful IT company on the planet. Just cause he works hard and earns money for doing so, no reason to be jealous. He gives hundreds of millions a year to charity, just doesn't talk about in the press to score "brownie points" with the public.

+1

He's earned his wealth, what he does with it is his business.
 
People bitching about wealthy individuals are usually just jealous and to lazy to make their own. Stop complaining and go do something about it.

This is not a very fair statement since there are a lot of people who work very hard and will never be wealthy. I put a lot of dedication into my work, but I'm still just a lower middle class individual. Some wealth is inherited, some is through hard work and some of it is just luck or being in the right place at the right time.

The thing that is most important is that you like what you do everyday. I have a great job and I enjoy going to work everyday. That is what matters most to me.

Should wealthy people give to charity? Yes they should. I agree that everyone should give some percentage to charity unless they are actually poor and have no money to give.
 
With the amount of money he's brought to apple and success it is now no one can argue he's earned that. Critisise him alls you want the guy gets results.
 
Right.What he does with is money is nobody's damn business.Love to know what percentage the haters that come out every time is money is mentioned give themselves.
The amount Gates gives will never make up for the frustration and lost productivity is crap operating system.Maybe Jobs has less guilt to assuage.


You really love Steve, don't you? You just took another bullet for him, he must be proud of you! Well done.
 
I'm sure he does, but so what if he doesn't??? Anyway, how many billions has the government taken from him in the name of charity?

Maybe he follows the late George Steinbrenner's motto: "if you're contributing to charity for the publicity, you're not doing it for the right reason." In which case, maybe he does, and we just don't know about it.

People in this world do contribute and do not feel a need for everyone to know about it.
 
You respect an arrogant guy with $5 billion, who has in his entire lifetime donated about $350 USD to charity? Wow...

Face it, regardless of however much we all love Apple, Steve Jobs is an ******* - and he knows it. Yes, he has fantastic ideas (although I bet 90% of Apple products weren't his idea directly)...but he's still an a-s-s-h-o-l-e and always will be.

Who cares. Let him. If that helps him with ideas or motivates him or whatever the hell it means for Apple products, then more power to him. With what he's accomplished, he's got every damn right to be the biggest prick on the planet. Good for him. All that matters is the BOTTOM LINE: more great Apple gear. Not whether Steve Jobs is mean, or nice, or sensitive. LOL, you want to date him or something??
 
What's with all the negative comments and ratings? Is it bad for someone to be successful? Shouldn't a man be rewarded for his success and hard work?

Not if it's Steve Jobs. So many people come to MacRumors to make Apple look bad, the news story could be "Steve Jobs helps little old lady cross the street," and the negative votes would flood in accompanied by comments like "why can't he leave the poor woman alone!"

Meanwhile Bill Gates is doing the Andrew Carnegie thing. Be a royal business SOB who abuses monopoly positions and destroys rivals in petty ways, but hey, end your life by giving money away and suddenly people praise you. People are manipulative saps.

But no matter what Jobs does, it will be wrong. If he gives billions away, the comments will complain, just you wait. On MacRumors, if Apple or Jobs does it, it's wrong. If Microsoft does it, it's good. Hmm...a pattern develops...
 
Who cares. Really, does his attitude make any difference? It's all about Apple products. Why should you care about anything other than Apple gear, and if you're an investor, about Apple's bottom line. SJ can be anything he wants for all I care. I just want newer and better Apple goodies each year. As long as he isn't breaking any laws I don't give a sweet damn about his attitude. And it matters even less whether he gives to any charities. Unless that somehow impacts the iOS user interface. I'm sure Nokia's former CEO gives to charity. I'll tell myself that the next time I'm using their ****** products. That makes it all better. LOL

Completely agree. I really don't care what the CEOs of the companies whose products I buy are like. I'm buying the product, not endorsing the CEO.

I also think it's kinda funny that people parse gates and slam jobs. Yeah, gates has given a lot away, but even still his personal worth is 9x Jobs'. If you want to measure just by what good comes fro
a donation then gates looks great, but he hasn't exactly burdened himself, has he?

Again, I don't really care because I don't judge people based on what they do with their own lawfully earned money, but I do think it's kinda funny gates gets so much credit.
 
Where's that misleading and not-to-scale bar graph come from?

Why are the bar lengths not proportionate to the $ amounts?
 
Yes, that is what Warren Buffet did, if I recall correctly. He reasonably surmised that he was excellent at investing his money to get good returns, therefore he should get the good returns whilst he could before he gave the money to charity (I think he is donating to the B&MGF).

If you took all people with personal wealth over $5b, and did a one-off tax of 25% of wealth between $5b and $10b, and 50% over that, you would have a one-off tax income of $150b, but only affect 57 people. Lower the former boundary to $1b however, and the receipts would be far higher, yet you would still affect under 400 people. You could run the US military for a few months on that! (puts it into perspective, eh?)

You're contradicting yourself here. One excellent reason (among many) that your tax is a horrible idea is that the people with that much money are usually very good at generating more money. Take $5b from buffett and you've got a few more bombers to pummel some village in the middle east. Leave $5 b with Buffett and he'll make it $10b and put that money into companies trying to get back on their feet.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.