Steve surely is not a zenist. Everyone who follows it, know that sure doesn't exists, and there are endless points of view for everything. Contrary, he's absolutely confident that all what he does, is best, and the only right. And he better knows what others need. He's more as crusader catholic, George Bush of technology.
Better Steve being honourable and contributing behind closed doors than this pathetic circus...
But, if it's behind closed doors, we have no evidence whether it
is true or not.
Only the faith of the Apple fans that the turtlenecked overlord
is donating billions to help the world's less fortunate - no
evidence.
First of all how is this a respond to the criticism of the Gates Foundation? You conventionally omitted that.
Originally Posted by applesupergeek
Better Steve being honourable and contributing behind closed doors than this pathetic circus...
But, if it's behind closed doors, we have no evidence whether it
is true or not.
Only the faith of the Apple fans that the turtlenecked overlord
is donating billions to help the world's less fortunate - no
evidence.
You're so subversive. How many Macs and iPhones do you own???![]()
What does that have to do with anything on this forum?
You're so subversive. How many Macs and iPhones do you own???![]()
No, it has something to do with your attitude.
comment from the sideline: subversive? bad attitude? come on, guys. macrumors isn't a finishing school. just because we like apple doesn't mean we always have to like apple.
Kinda like robbing a bank and then returning most of the money later?
A real hero.![]()
When you have that much it's easy to give.
Bigger respect to all the regular people who have very little, who might be struggling themselves, but still give financially, or of their time.
Of course, the big-dollar handouts get the most attention.
oww wait, Jobs is really rich... gives away nothing![]()
Jobs is really rich... gives away nothing![]()
You need to re-read my sentence because your comprehension skills are terrible. Yes Apple uses Chinese 'practically slave' labour but thats not relevant to the original point.
I guess youve never done anything remotely close to running a business.
Let's try again. Here is your original sentence: "Because of Mr Gates' creation of the 'cheap computer for all' revolution, we now have slave labour for electronics production."
Hypothesis: Mr. Gates did not actually create the cheap computer for all revolution.
1) "Cheap computer revolution" refers to the use of Chinese manufacturing in the production of computers.
2) Apple products are manufactured in China.
3) Apple goes out of its way to avoid any of Mr. Gates's "revolutions".
∴ Mr. Gates did not create the cheap computer for all revolution.
Q.E.D.
No, I'm still a student and therefore, yes, I don't have any relevant business experience. What does this have to do with the double standard some are applying to Mr. Jobs and Mr. Gates?