Worth the trouble?
Computers in general are used to lessen the trouble.
I actually get a chuckle out of those saying "is it worth the trouble?".
<sarcasm>No, popping a Blu-Ray disc in is too much trouble. It would be much easier to buy a Windows PC, rip a copy of the BD to DVD, then take that in my MacBook. OR pay for the same content twice by getting it on iTunes.</sarcasm>
No, you chaps misunderstood that... so i'll clarify: Is it worth the trouble
for Apple to build BD versions of their products just to please a few whiners? Should they retool their manufacturing and design departments just to cater to you?? Apparently not.
Then it would be really nice to watch bd movies on an aeroplane?
Oh right... because the
ambient lighting and noise on a jet (aeroplane?) are just
perfect for viewing ultra-super-mega-maxi high quality media. Good point.
I think what's mindboggling is that this thread is still going.
There is nothing surprising about Jobs apologists telling users of this forum why they're wrong to want a feature.
Who told whom that they were
"wrong to want BD"? Can you quote the actual post... or are you just fabricating bovine flatulence?
You get the same morons defending Apple when they remove a feature like matte screens or firewire (on the smaller laptops) and you never hear them admit they were wrong to assert his Jobsness's infallibility when Apple deigns to bring back those features that so many people missed.
That's not mindboggling, Aiden, that's just par for the course.
I suspect Apple may be forced to adopt bluray in about 3 years time (by which time many professionals will have moved back to Avid and Linux/Windows), but that they can probably live without adopting it quite comfortably and keep shafting us the way they always have, safe in the knowledge that there will always be enough idiots fervent enough to argue their non-existent case.
What's "non-existent" are the points of view you've invented to post against.

[else, quote the person directly... instead of chatting it up with Aiden as an aside, in typical troll fashion.] Looks to me like you're overreacting to hallucinations or something.
I believe what you are talking about is cognitive dissonance. It is very interesting to watch...
True... unless of course one's perception of what's
actually happening is mistaken. In which case, "cognitive dissonance" merely becomes a pseudo-intellectual term which doesn't (properly) apply to the current situation.
First, people seem to be forgetting that buying the drive isn't enough as OSX will not play back a Blu-Ray movie.
Second, think about scenarios other than your own, please quit it with the 15" screen nonsense. What about someone with a 30" cinema display? Or a 27" iMac? Or someone trying to use a Mac Mini as a HTPC on a 70" HDTV?
Third, why do they include DVD Player if nobody wants to watch a movie on their laptop, huh?
I have a stand-alone Blu-Ray player, I also have a PS3. But my preferred method of watching is on a HOME THEATER PC because it's the best way to bring together all my media sources, web, digital, and physical. Sadly, this can not be an Apple machine because they don't support Blu-Ray and until the very last refresh don't support multichannel audio over HDMI. Macs just aren't the best machine for being a home media entertainment device, and that's really sad. Everybody's image is the opposite, but Apple is not the best multimedia platform anymore. The noobs who think they're media savvy without really knowing what they're talking about are fooled enough.
That post is okay i guess. Still suffers slightly from the "
anybody who doesn't care about Blu-ray is wrong, and therefore deserves my wrath" mentality.
In the end though, nothing's really getting accomplished here. Facts are one thing and opinions are another. Most people
don't need their Mac to support BD... that's a fact, Jack. And calling them names will only result in more posts from me.