It is about CHOICE. Why should the choice be denied?
You're right. It's Apple's choice to determine what to put into their products.
Your choice whether to buy them or not.
Don't see where choice is being denied.
It is about CHOICE. Why should the choice be denied?
No I really do want to give people a hard copy. You younger folk might love hitting the net and finding all your memories that way but there are still quite a few of us and older that like to have a collection of discs and walk into a room and pop one in. Just one machine to worry about: the player. No need to worry about internet connection or finding the right file or bandwidth issues, etc. Find the disc with the bride and groom on it and bam! instant wedding memories.
You're right. It's Apple's choice to determine what to put into their products.
Your choice whether to buy them or not.
Don't see where choice is being denied.
You're right. It's Apple's choice to determine what to put into their products.
Your choice whether to buy them or not.
Don't see where choice is being denied.
There is no choice. There are only 2 consumer platforms and one of them is garbage.
Of course it is Sony.
Why do you think Sony make the PS3 as a vehicle for BluRay.
DVD drives are old technology, and add a bunch of weight to laptops. It would make sense to have a Blu-ray drive standard on iMac's, Mac Mini's, and Mac Pro's, but Macbook's don't need a DVD drive. I would prefer a cheap (non-standard) external Blu-ray drive that can attach to Macbook's via USB 3.0. (USB 3.0 is what Mac's need)
That's like saying Toyota chooses not to put airbags in their automobiles. It's your choice whether to buy them or not.
You're right. It's Apple's choice to determine what to put into their products.
Your choice whether to buy them or not.
Don't see where choice is being denied.
Not too surprising. He's never hinted at adding it. Doesn't bother me though. I've never owned a Blu-ray player. I just download movies. I'm ok with having less discs laying around.
But I know I'm in the minority . . .
Because, fortunately, or unfortunately, BluRay won the battle. Maybe HD-DVD was better.
You're right. It's Apple's choice to determine what to put into their products.
Your choice whether to buy them or not.
Don't see where choice is being denied.
As a Mac Pro user, I am just grateful that he remembered that his company makes computers. Now if only I could see some evidence that he remembers that they make professional computers....
It was a long and bloody battle. Expensive it was with many casualties.
Sony won. But all they won was a small island with a few goats.
The age of hardware formats is coming to an end. It started with Wax Cylinders, transitioned through 8-track and MiniDisc and ends with BluRay.
It's a great format for collectors. But those of us without Asperger's prefer our content in more accessible forms.
C.
How are PS3's sales compared to Wii and xbox?
Is the blu ray feature a difference maker in that market?
It's not owned by Sony. Sony is only part of the Blu-ray equation. The rights are held by the Blu-ray Consortium, which is an industry consortium made up of many industry players. Same as with the MPEG-LA of which Apple is part for H.264.
You do not pay Sony for rights to Blu-ray, but Sony gets part of the money. Just like you don't pay Apple for H.264, but Apple gets money for it.
Seriously, you're just arguing in bad faith.
I do hear your point, but until you view a movie in Blu-Ray, you just won't believe it. I rent the movies I want,in BluRay from Netflix. I won't ,and have never, bought a movie in iTunes . The quality in downloaded movies simply cannot compare. I have rentals in my Netflix App on my iPad, I do view them, but I get them free, comes with my rental subscription, they do not compare in any way,shape or form to a movie in Blu-Ray![]()
Not very sensible if you want your content to be accessible. Having to go to the cupboard to find a specific file seems massively inconvenient.
It's a great format for collectors. But those of us without Asperger's prefer our content in more accessible forms.
Call us when it's actually ended though. We still have a few good years left. Until then, enjoy your wait for downloads to catch up to the quality we had 5 years ago.
And enjoy your ISP fees for download caps being busted. Oh and enjoy redownloading movies because of hard drive failures, or having to run 220v to spin up your massive entreprise grade disk arrays.
Call us when it's actually ended though. We still have a few good years left. Until then, enjoy your wait for downloads to catch up to the quality we had 5 years ago.
And enjoy your ISP fees for download caps being busted. Oh and enjoy redownloading movies because of hard drive failures, or having to run 220v to spin up your massive entreprise grade disk arrays.
The choice to continue to be a Mac OS user, while also being able to utilize the BluRay playback or burning technology is the choice being denied.
It is POOR business sense for Apple to limit the appeal of Mac OS, and Apple computer hardware, by denying compatibility, even from a third-party stand-point, of an industry accepted standard.
I can rent Blu-Ray discs down the street. I can buy BluRay discs at retail stores, or online and have them shipped to me for rental or purchase.
I cannot use those industry-accepted format discs in my Apple computer, not a laptop, not a Mac Mini HTPC, which is one of the common uses of a Mac Mini. I could not burn an archive copy of my data onto a stable, secure high-capacity optical disc archive, if I want to.
It is a choice for Apple to deny that... but it is a significantly short-sighted, and poor choice that limits Apple's appeal. Apple hasn't previously been able to afford to limit their appeal. It may return to that again, if Apple continues to push a bad position, arrogantly.