Not surprisingly most of the coverage is anti-Steve because Steve is dead and the ultimately icon to beat up on and fabulous link-bait. Don't pretend that wasn't your goal.
Right. This is all about tarnishing Steve's saintly image.
There you have it. Steve is righteously pissed two former senior execs are helping Palm do a brain-drain at Apple using knowledge known to them only because of their high level access and experience at their former employer.
The Palm CEO even agrees this isn't about employees moving between companies but I think he realizes he's in deep trouble so wants something "on the record" in the form of an email for CYA... he says employees are told they have a duty to former employers and Palm isn't interested in confidential information about Apple.
You're looking at it as Apple vs. The Rest of the World, which is hardly the case. If Apple has a guy well known for being a great UI builder the industry over, people are going to want to hire him. It happens all the time in every industry the world over. Someone has a knack for something, people want him working for them.
It completely makes sense Steve would threaten to use IP against Palm because Palm is building WebOS and Pre to compete with iPhone and using ex Apple employees to do it.
There are and were many ex-Palm employees working at Apple on iOS during the building of the Pre and WebOS. How does the opposite situation somehow excuse threatening a rival company from doing the same thing?
As CEO, Steve had a duty and that was protecting Apple. He was known to play hardball. That's what you need in an executive and that's what this was.
So long as their countermeasures are legal, you're right. This? It's a bit too dark grey and suspicious to consider it simply a CEO playing hardball.
Think about it, if you had iPhone and you see Eric Schmitt on your board one minute and Google switching from Black berry clone to iPhone clones with Android the next and watch two of your senior executive go make an iPhone competitor at Palm, you are NOT going to go quietly, roll over.
lets look at logic for a second. Schmitt supposedly steals Apple's entire idea for a touch based OS while on the board at Apple.
...yet nothing happens to him. No lawsuits. No breach of trust or NDA agreements, no insider knowledge issues. Nothing. Steve Jobs, the man who happily screamed at everyone and everything and rarely ever had anything good to say about the competition or it's people...
...had absolutely nothing bad to say about Eric Schmitt, despite "stealing" iOS right out from under him.
Yet despite the writing on the wall, people endlessly perpetuate this whole idea that he's some big, clever corporate spy who screwed Apple over royally.
I'm wondering how anyone who has more than two brain cells to rub together can continue to believe he abused his position to further his own ends.
I can't help but wonder if these same employees who think they were screwed by any 'no cold call' agreements are the same ones who are the type to scurry off and build copycats elsewhere because they're lazy, not inspired.
They probably made it through college sharing assignments, cheating and brown nosing. The people who worked the hardest were too busy working and not looking for opportunities to get ahead.
Right. If some competing corporation were to call you up one day and offer you a raise for coming to work for them, you wouldn't take it, I assume. You'd be more concerned with "doing the right thing".
I swear, this is the most half assed apology ridden post I've seen on this board in awhile. And that's saying quite a bit. You have absolutely no facts, no logic, to back up your statements. It's all feel-good "Apple is always right" BS, and nothing more.