Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The Palm CEO even agrees this isn't about employees moving between companies but I think he realizes he's in deep trouble so wants something "on the record" in the form of an email for CYA... he says employees are told they have a duty to former employers and Palm isn't interested in confidential information about Apple.

Why is he in great trouble?

I think that active recruiting from other companies it is not illegal, am I wrong?
 
Well, aside from the upper management, what you're proposing is already happening.
Over half of Silicon Valley employees as Asian. IBM is also replacing almost all their American R&D staff with Asians & Indians. IBM expects by the latter-half of this decade, over 70% of their engineers will be of Korean, Chinese, Japanese or Indian descent.

And American patriots like LagunaSol and Iconoclysm still think Americans are the ones who lead in technology and make technological breakthroughs. Denial at its best, heh? :D

Do you believe what you read, or do you work in Silicon Valley?
Since I work in R&D at a semiconductor company and have worked at some of those companies you seem to know so much about.

You don't have a clue.
 
Do you have those links saved in Word file or something? Ready to go at a moments notice? :confused:

It took me all of 3 minutes to find the credible articles on Google and pull them back. No need to save them in a word file when simple searches like "Samsung Scandal" or "Samsung Bribery" pull the results back for you.

----------

*yawn*
Where did I deny that Samsung wasn't scum or that they were never involved in illegal activities? I'm saying that it's hypocritical of Apple fanboys to proclaim that Samsung was scum and not mention the scum-like activities of Apple.
And just because other companies participated doesn't make it right. The way I see it, Apple is the biggest scum of them all. They make Samsung look like Mother Teresa. All Samsung is involved with is bribery of Korean politicians to get tax cuts and even more tax cuts, which doesn't really harm anyone. Apple's activities, on the other hand...

They kinda also bribed judges and elected officials to get not one, but two pardons from the South Korean government:

http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/samsungs-former-chairman-pardoned-again/

Mother Teresa, indeed.
 
Love the response from Palm.

Bullying and intimidation doesn't sit well with everybody.
 
Yeah, I do... Steve was doing what he could to do what was right. Palm wasn't playing ball. The agreement between the big companies wouldn't exist if it was wrong or unfair. And, did you even read the links that were served to you?

Huh?
Are you real?
You believe that companies do what is fair and right??

Companies don't have anything but interests and will do what they can to serve those interests. They will do unethical, illegal and immoral things to achieve their objectives.

If you believe anything else. I have some stock in a silver mine I'd like to sell you.
 
Steve Jobs was a great innovator but was also a terrible human being.

Compared to who? Most people have lied or threatened during their lifetimes. It's hardly surprising, and Steve wasn't the only one involved.
 
To put this whole mess in perspective here's what wall street thinks about this ungodly revelation :

AAPL is UP 7 points the day that analyst think Apple is going to miss it's mark.


That's how bad this way overblown story is.
 
Terrible. This practice should be outlawed. If you want top talent, pay top dollar.

Bingo!! And that's where there agreement run afoul.
They get to keep employees that may be the best of the best, but they don't need to pay the freight because they don't have to compete on salary with other top tier companies.

If you want the best, pay the freight.
 
To put this whole mess in perspective here's what wall street thinks about this ungodly revelation :

AAPL is UP 7 points the day that analyst think Apple is going to miss it's mark.


That's how bad this way overblown story is.

Of course Wall Street doesn't care. It hardly affects the bottom lines of any company involved.

The only reason it's a big deal over here is that it provides evidence for the Apple Skeptics, who see Jobs as a misanthrope, to support their position, and it stirs up a strong backlash from the crowd that believes he was a demigod who could do no wrong.
 
Last edited:
I don't think it hurts employees.
If Palm would look for a talented programmer they'd just place an ad and you would be free to apply for the job.
If they targeted you specifically they'd know exactly what you are working on and what you learned at apple.
In that case you'd be a higher level employee at apple and know perfectly well that you are valuable to competing companies.
So if you didn't care working for Apple anymore or want more money your resume would help you.

So whats he problem here? Earning far more than 100K and don't have the balls to apply for a better job or ask for more...
Pay for a negotiator!

You are wrong.
As someone that works in Silicon Valley and someone that has had to hire employees.

1. Referrals from current employees are some of the best hires you will ever get.
2. Top people are hard to get and almost never looking unless completely pissed off.
3. Recruiting people that are currently employed at other firms gets you someone that it probably technically current. See number 1.

It not only hurt the employees directly. If hurt independent head hunters and everyone in my industry. It served to help cap salaries for years.
 
Not surprisingly most of the coverage is anti-Steve because Steve is dead and the ultimately icon to beat up on and fabulous link-bait. Don't pretend that wasn't your goal.

Right. This is all about tarnishing Steve's saintly image.

There you have it. Steve is righteously pissed two former senior execs are helping Palm do a brain-drain at Apple using knowledge known to them only because of their high level access and experience at their former employer.

The Palm CEO even agrees this isn't about employees moving between companies but I think he realizes he's in deep trouble so wants something "on the record" in the form of an email for CYA... he says employees are told they have a duty to former employers and Palm isn't interested in confidential information about Apple.

You're looking at it as Apple vs. The Rest of the World, which is hardly the case. If Apple has a guy well known for being a great UI builder the industry over, people are going to want to hire him. It happens all the time in every industry the world over. Someone has a knack for something, people want him working for them.

It completely makes sense Steve would threaten to use IP against Palm because Palm is building WebOS and Pre to compete with iPhone and using ex Apple employees to do it.

There are and were many ex-Palm employees working at Apple on iOS during the building of the Pre and WebOS. How does the opposite situation somehow excuse threatening a rival company from doing the same thing?

As CEO, Steve had a duty and that was protecting Apple. He was known to play hardball. That's what you need in an executive and that's what this was.

So long as their countermeasures are legal, you're right. This? It's a bit too dark grey and suspicious to consider it simply a CEO playing hardball.

Think about it, if you had iPhone and you see Eric Schmitt on your board one minute and Google switching from Black berry clone to iPhone clones with Android the next and watch two of your senior executive go make an iPhone competitor at Palm, you are NOT going to go quietly, roll over.

lets look at logic for a second. Schmitt supposedly steals Apple's entire idea for a touch based OS while on the board at Apple.

...yet nothing happens to him. No lawsuits. No breach of trust or NDA agreements, no insider knowledge issues. Nothing. Steve Jobs, the man who happily screamed at everyone and everything and rarely ever had anything good to say about the competition or it's people...

...had absolutely nothing bad to say about Eric Schmitt, despite "stealing" iOS right out from under him.

Yet despite the writing on the wall, people endlessly perpetuate this whole idea that he's some big, clever corporate spy who screwed Apple over royally.

I'm wondering how anyone who has more than two brain cells to rub together can continue to believe he abused his position to further his own ends.

I can't help but wonder if these same employees who think they were screwed by any 'no cold call' agreements are the same ones who are the type to scurry off and build copycats elsewhere because they're lazy, not inspired.

They probably made it through college sharing assignments, cheating and brown nosing. The people who worked the hardest were too busy working and not looking for opportunities to get ahead.

Right. If some competing corporation were to call you up one day and offer you a raise for coming to work for them, you wouldn't take it, I assume. You'd be more concerned with "doing the right thing".

I swear, this is the most half assed apology ridden post I've seen on this board in awhile. And that's saying quite a bit. You have absolutely no facts, no logic, to back up your statements. It's all feel-good "Apple is always right" BS, and nothing more.
 
Of course Wall Street doesn't care. It hardly affects the bottom lines of any company involved.

The only reason it's a big deal over here is that it provides evidence for the Apple Skeptics, who see Jobs as a misanthrope, to support their position, and it stirs up a strong backlash from the crowd that believes he was a demigod who could do no wrong.

To be more specific it provides more ammunition for the Apple haters who seem to have taken over a forum that I used to like.
 
Job's always knew that Apple's advantage was its people.
So sure he wanted to keep them out of the hands of competitors.


Of course. And he had an infinite number of moral and legal means to accomplish exactly that.

But he chose means that hurt his employees, other companies, the American economy, and consumers worldwide.

It made bigger profits to shovel towards Wall Street, so he did it that way, all other considerations be damned.

It almost sounds like the cliche "You'll never work in this town again!" that horrible bosses in movies say. :)

I'm sure that Steve never said that to anybody though.

No, he went behind their backs and colluded with other fatcats to accomplish the same thing. Does that make it OK?

----------

Steve Jobs was a great innovator but was also a terrible human being.

Steve was not an innovator. He was instead a "great artist".
 
To be more specific it provides more ammunition for the Apple haters who seem to have taken over a forum that I used to like.

Apple haters. Uh huh. I guess if Steve Jobs killed someone in cold blood, and we weren't on here claiming he did it in self defense and is being screwed over by the courts...

...we'd be Apple haters in your eyes, right?

You know, it's very possible to say something negative about a company or call them out when they've done something wrong, and not be a "hater", right?
 
I miss Steve. He was cut-throat. I don't think Cook has the same type of killer instinct that Steve had, hopefully Apple doesn't suffer from it.
 
To be more specific it provides more ammunition for the Apple haters who seem to have taken over a forum that I used to like.

Your twisted definition of an 'Apple Hater' seems to be anyone who doesn't blindly follow them like it was Scientology. Apple is not perfect. They are just as slimy as Samsung, Google, Microsoft, Adobe, HP, Intel, Oracle, etc.

We dont have to agree with everything they do. To do so would be mind numbingly idiotic.

I use Apple products because I love the software. I dont buy "because its apple" - that would be stupid. If Apple stopped making decent things that do what I want, I'd go elsewhere - loyalty to a hardware or software company really is pointless. Buy what works. Dont buy for the label.
 
Apple haters. Uh huh. I guess if Steve Jobs killed someone in cold blood, and we weren't on here claiming he did it in self defense and is being screwed over by the courts...

...we'd be Apple haters in your eyes, right?

You know, it's very possible to say something negative about a company or call them out when they've done something wrong, and not be a "hater", right?

Looking at this forum in the whole I would say I disagree.
 
To be more specific it provides more ammunition for the Apple haters who seem to have taken over a forum that I used to like.

Every story does seem to polarize these days. When you're top dog, there are always throngs of people who want to see you dethroned.

I love my iPad, and to a lesser extent my iPhone, and would have serious withdrawals if forced to go back to a life pre-Mobile data. But I must admit that I miss the days where the next exciting rumor was "Powerbook G5 next Tuesday!" or "Widescreen iPod?".
 
To put this whole mess in perspective here's what wall street thinks about this ungodly revelation :

AAPL is UP 7 points the day that analyst think Apple is going to miss it's mark.


That's how bad this way overblown story is.

Oh just wait until Apple gets slammed with losing the law suit and then slapped with another massive fine from the DoJ for it as well.

Apple is running a huge risk right now of being the company made an example out of it.
 
To be more specific it provides more ammunition for the Apple haters who seem to have taken over a forum that I used to like.

Your best bet is to killfile posters whose opinions you dislike. You'll likely start to enjoy the forum more if you do that.

The Bozo Bin can be a useful tool.
 
What a great leader and manager was he.. He was working with great talent and he did everything he could to protect them from the greedy poachers.. I can't see anything wrong in that tbh..

RIP Steve.. :(

You just keep on drinking that Kool-Aid! Oh yeah!!!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.