Why would you give an organ to Steve Jobs who has done little to no philanthropic work with the money he has made. I would much rather give Bill Gates support than Jobs.
Oh please. You shouldn't go down this road here.
Just because billy g felt obligated to carry on the philanthropic tradition that his PARENTS had started long before he was able to contribute anything himself after having let them down by dropping out of Harvard among other reasons (mainly his wife Melinda's prodding and especially to gain a more innocent image in the face of his companies anti-trust conviction here in the U.S. back in 2001), doesn't change the fact that his contributions were from ill gotten gains.
Steve Jobs and Apple are too busy changing the way the world interacts with technology by innovating devices and services. billy g was (until he jumped the sinking m$ ship last year in the face of getting his and his companies own a$$ handed to them by SJ and Apple as they have been doing for over the past year), and
steve "screeching call for developers and dance sweaty monkey boy, dance!" ballmer are only busy innovating new ways to flagrantly steal Apple's ideas and to market them as their own to a not so near as foolish anymore public.
Of course I realize that billy g's contributions are helpful to the worldwide community overall, so I don't mind taking money from a thief for that cause.
But he's still just an untalented thief in the end.
Many criminals (especially mobsters) and terrorist organizations (Hezbollah in Lebanon) "give" to their communities in order to try and "brainwash" the public from knowing (or remembering) how it is that they got the ability to give in the first place. To this day, infamous Colombian drug lord and mass murderer Pablo Escobar is heralded as a national hero by Colombian locals which "benefited" from his blood money.
Don't be fooled by a wolf in sheep's clothing. Especially an ignorant and cowardly one like billy g who happened to make one good decision that is irrelevant now and is exactly why windows users are switching to Macs by the hundreds of thousands year over year... he sacrificed quality control for marketshare. Now that the common public along with every other computer user is demanding security, reliability, and ease of use when executing todays more involved computer tasks in relation to the tasks that they were limited to in the past primarily because of the cruel joke and flawed OS that is windows, everyone is screaming for better computer products that are derived from a much higher level of quality control between the hardware, the OS, and even online services.
They're demanding Macs.
If it walks like a thief, and talks like a thief, then it must be billy g... but I'll gladly take a thief's money for good wordly causes
without praising him for it.
ON TOPIC:
As for the keynote, this can't be singularly Mac. Too much hype.
It was clearly stated to those invited to this Tuesday's press event that this is a Mac-focused event:
http://www.macworld.com/news/2007/07/31/presentation/index.php