SJ better not use this keynote to ram more IPHONE Garbage down our throats. blah, blah...
It's "iPhone", peach boy.
SJ better not use this keynote to ram more IPHONE Garbage down our throats. blah, blah...
To me it sounds like you'll stretch/twist/bend any announcement about OS X and bend it into "more iPhone garbage" so that you can complain.
I know a lot of people are upset about Leopard, but you just need to relax. Tiger is still the most advanced consumer-oriented operating system on the market. And it's not like Apple CANCELED Leopard. They just set it back 120 days. Can't you wait that long?
Besides, the iPhone *is* a revolutionary device. Leopard, on the whole, is not as revolutionary (at least that we know of). The iPhone will add a fortune to Apple's bottom line. No it's not for everyone, and yes it sucks that it has its limitations, but niether the same applies to every single one of Apple's products. Like, I know the Mac Pro is way too powerful for me. I know that the iPhone is out of my price range. I know that the Mac Mini won't be powerful enough to do what I want it to.
Here's the thing though: I can gaurantee that Apple has, at some point, delayed a product release to work on a project that didn't apply to me. Does that mean they alienated and abandoned me? No. It just means I had to wait another 4 months to buy that product.
You have to think about what is in Apple's best interest as opposed to your best interest. A delay in Leopard had/has some detrimental effects, but they are limited. A delay of the iPhone would have been catastrophic, not only for Apple's reputation, but also its stock price.
Leopard needed to be delayed.
-Clive
With product managers having time to run around taking pics with the iPhone while eating pizza Apple darn well better show us some stuff other than the iPhone.
Toast, my friend. Eating toast.
And what are you saying? That no Apple employee should be able to eat breakfast with friends until the iPhone and Leopard are completed?
sheesh.
-Clive
Last year, nov, I wanted to buy iwork 06 but I thought... no no no... wait 2 months and then you can get iwork 07... because they ALWAYS update these apps at macworld.... so I wait, and no mention... well... OK... I guess I can wait..... until early spring.
[...]
So I don't have a reason to be annoyed?
There better be product annoucnes on top of Leopard...
Toast, my friend. Eating toast.
And what are you saying? That no Apple employee should be able to eat breakfast with friends until the iPhone and Leopard are completed?
sheesh.
-Clive
I have this feeling that we are going to be utterly dissapointed with whatever these "Top Secret" features are.
let's hear the prediction.
A company with $770M quarterly profits, $7B of cold hard cash in the bank...and it doesn't have the manpower to design a phone and a laptop?
I predict that Steve will be wearing jeans during the keynote.
With product managers having time to run around taking pics with the iPhone while eating pizza Apple darn well better show us some stuff other than the iPhone.
I want to see him wear like black jeans and a blue turtle/mock neck.. just to switch it up.
I dunno... I think a lot of people were jazzed about Time Machine, Spaces and the new functionalities of Mail, iChat and Dashboard widgets.I have this feeling that we are going to be utterly dissapointed with whatever these "Top Secret" features are.
That's right. Coke and Twinkies only until yer done!
Keep in mind that we (probably) already know about one of the "top secret" features: ZFS. Apple has made no official announcement that ZFS will be in Leopard, and if it hadn't been for the leaks, we still wouldn't know about it. Considering that ZFS is a big deal and Apple appears to have taken pains to hide it, it's almost certainly one of the top secret features.
It's also worth pointing out that Time Machine uses hard links to make it look like each dated backup directory is in fact a complete copy of your hard disk, at a different point in time. This, as far as I know, is unusual for a backup program -- I'm not aware of any others which structure their backups this way. It's also exactly what ZFS snapshots look like -- a bunch of directories, each of which contains a complete copy of your hard disk at a different point in time. Couple the ZFS-friendly layout with the fact that Time Machine now does hourly backups (which is perfectly reasonable for snapshots, but probably too frequent if you have to store a complete copy of each modified file), and I'm 95% confident that Time Machine will in fact use ZFS and snapshots rather than HFS+ and hard links when it ships.
But, of course, we already know all this, so it's not "top secret" and everyone is going to say "That's it?!? But we already knew about ZFS!". Just because we already know about something doesn't mean it's not one of the "top secret" features. I'd love to get some nice surprises, but I'm more than happy with the things we already know about Leopard. It's going to be a nice upgrade.