Please. Companies didn't leave first, employees left first. I worked for a company that had 3 main factory plants, in a high tech industry. One here in MN, one in Mexico, one China. Never visited the other two, but the local one was staffed mainly with recent immigrants, mostly from eastern Asia. Not exactly the "good ol' real American" stuff people like you are reminiscing about, yet have probably never experienced.
And that was 15 years ago when I worked there. Now, the research was here. People here are willing to do that kind of work.
Face it, people here don't want to do this work, not in the numbers it takes to support our high-tech purchasing. It had to leave this country or all this tech wouldn't even exist today. Japan doesn't do this work anymore, either.
You really think no Americans want to work in manufacturing? Tell that to all the former auto workers in Detroit. Tell that to the laid off employees of the former PackardBellNEC plant here in Sacramento or the various people in nearby Folsom and Roseville that have been laid off over the years by Intel and NEC. Or go back to 1984 and tell all the former Atari employees who got laid off when Jack Tramiel sent all the manufacturing jobs over to Taiwan and elsewhere.
The reports are that it would increase the cost of an iPhone anywhere between 10%-20% to have them assembled here in the US. I'd gladly pay that. Furthermore, it boggles my mind that so many businesses and government agencies are so comfortable with purchasing Lenovo computer products when the company is owned by China's People's Liberation Army...
Only in the sick American version of capitalism.
Yes, that's why Apple - unlike Microsoft - doesn't do anything for charity.
Microsoft is as brutal as any other corporation when it comes to business, BUT Microsoft also does a lot for education and charities. And no, I am NOT mistaking Microsoft for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation - those are two different things, but Microsoft has already done a lot before Bill Gates even thought about starting his Foundation.
Microsoft doesn't do this out of the goodness of their hearts. They do this because such investments pave the wave for a better future for everybody which secures the company's own growth on the long run.
Was that meant to be a joke? Microsoft does nothing for charity. "Donating" licenses for Windows and Office do not count as properly donating to charities and schools. Especially since Microsoft is so well known to sue charities and schools who use donated computers yet failed to send Microsoft cash for use of the operating system and other software that came along with those donated computers because Microsoft views that as "piracy".
Maybe Microsoft should focus on paying all the taxes they've shirked from Washington State that has been going on for close to 2 decades now if they want to be serious about their social commitments. The same goes for all of their European tax evasion by sending all their monies through their Irish subsidiary.
Bill Gates also always believed that out-sourcing was an extraordinarily stupid idea and that out-sourcing production and development to foreign countries on the long run only destroys your home country's economy and intellectual resources and capabilities. Because when you outsource development and production to another country, all you do is building up THEIR economy and THEIR infrastructure and THEIR future. By out-sourcing, you're only breeding your future competitors. But it looks great on your short term revenue streams - and greed dictates that you should do this, because, as you've said, businesses are only in this for the money and to increase their revenue.
Are you referring to the same Bill Gates who always lobbies hard for the H1B program that imports foreign software developers so Microsoft doesn't have to pay them equivalent salaries and bennies like true blue Americans? Great example there.
Good point, GE is money hole, and Al Gore sits on Apples Board of Directors.
GE will own General Motors within 5 years.
Not necessarily - it could also mean that we are working on a system such that Stuxnet doesn't happen to our facilities in America. Have you also forgotten the fact that many American companies' servers, including Google and Adobe were hacked by a sophisticated attacked by Chinese Government hackers back in early 2010? Keeping these in mind, we definitely need a security assessment for our infrastructure. Not every thing needs to look suspicious or some form of Government take over.
Just imagine what China could do if they merely took a few million of their citizens and made them computer hackers...
Obama is a smart man. So is Jobs. The issue I see with both is they both have very selfish agendas. That doesn't mean they will try and push each but I would really love to see Gates at least in the convo. Technology is more than just Green Energy and Cool gadgets... philanthropy is something that needs to be looking into.
I'd rather Obama give Nolan Bushnell the same type of medal George W gave to Ralph Baer.
Even though this is being billed as some kind of industry meeting, because it's a private dinner rather than anything involving the press or photo opportunities, I would wager that it has more to do with schmoozing and fundraising. The Obama re-election campaign has set an informal but oft-stated target of raising one billion dollars for the 2012 election. Corporate and wealthy private donors are crucial for both parties and Wall Street isn't as welcoming this time around.
A monarch would be a cheaper alternative to an elected figurehead that we have to replace every 4 to 8 years at great expense and the angering of 50% of the country.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPod; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)
It's a good thing Jobs is meeting Obama and not Bush. Bush would probably try to slip him some tongue, like he did with the Saudis...
As opposed to Obama who will bow to any tin pot 3rd world dictator he meets. Of course, he won't show the same respect to Queen Elizabeth because he's apparently still butthurt over what the British allegedly/speculatively did to his paternal grandfather.
hey steve, while you're at it, ask obama why he's still hiding his birth certificate. or, maybe obama is looking for app for that.
The thing that bugs me about this is McCain was fully open with all of his records [unlike Obama]. Hell, Congress even had its own investigation into whether or not McCain could even qualify to be POTUS because of where he was born...