Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Source? I can't find anything like that on either apple website... Or any news site for that matter..

Try PRNewswire.

It's the place all Apple's press releases go - when new products are announced they normally have all the details about ten minutes prior to the store going back online.

It's true, not sure what it means because deciphering legalese is like deciphering one of Clevin's posts but it's definitely true.
 
*bookmarks site*

Cheers :)

Hmmm... "Peaceful Co-operation"... Does that pretty much mean "We gon' sell stuff wiv um"? ":p
 
It's a legal long-term truce, but one in (our) Apple's favor, rather than Beatle-Apple's.

Our Apple is now the one with power, so much so that it indisputably owns all Apple-related copyrights, including those used by Beatle-Apple. Now, Steve et al. will generously allow (for $) Beatle-Apple to use those images/terms everyone was squabbling about before--but the bottom line is that our Apple has the upper hand, because it now owns *everything* related to the name Apple. If they want to yank back the right for Beatle-Apple to call itself Apple Records, Cupertino can do that. I'm sure there are safeguards in the agreement for Beatle-Apple's peace of mind, but the bottom line is that this is a victory for our Apple, hands down. From there being two parties owning a company named Apple and claiming to own the name Apple, now there is just one with a legal claim on the name, our Apple.

In addition, part of the triggers for the renewed hostilities between the two, the success of iTunes (which the Beatle-Apple, as a recording company, had deeply resented as a violation of the previous "stay in your own field" agreements) will go untouched.

While none of this prohibits a Beatles special edition on iTunes (or a themed iPod), this is just an announcement of the long-term legal peace between the two Apples. I imagine they're holding off on announcing catalog access since this particular announcement is meant to boost investors' interest in our Apple and its solidity, and a catalog announcement would be more consumer-targeted.
 
my thoughts

Super Bowl commercials are the most expensive thing in the world next to a BJ from Jessica Alba.

And it's certainly a clever governmental scheme to induce alcohol poisoning in a nation of braying meatheads (thereby kindly thinning the pack for the rest of us).

:p ;) :D
 
beatles

Bahh!The Beatles...do any of the surviving members or their relatives need money at this point? Everytime I hear about them it sounds like they are just after more money....I hope the ad is about anything other than the beatles.

the beatles revolutionized rock & Roll and when they started they were not even about money, but they where about the girls.
I would be more than happy to see the beatles on itunes.:apple: :D
 
I'm laughing at all those who were utterly disappointed that there was no ad. I kept my hopes for an ad low, just in case.
 
Recurring Rumors

The annual Super Bowl commercial rumor. There was a rumor of a Super Bowl add last year too. And there will be one next year. How quickly we forget.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.