What does your quote mean?Ignoring this ruling completely. America's court system is a complete joke.
What does your quote mean?Ignoring this ruling completely. America's court system is a complete joke.
That SCOTUS justices appointed by 4 presidents of two different parties and confirmed by Senates of various party make-ups can unanimously decide on the same thing.What does your quote mean?
I'm not trolling. Let's be able to differentiate criticizing from trolling.
I'm very upset with Tim Cook for steadily damaging the company Steve Jobs built.
They copyrighted a touch screen rectangle though, I mean come on.
100% of 50% of fake, made up on the fly statistics on the internet are fake.wow 8-0 decision? i don't think any case in the history of supreme court has an all in favor of one party. 99 percent of the cases has a decision around 5-4 but damn 8-0?
Good artists copy, great artists steal...
Where have I heard that before...
(The irony is too much)
You just can't see they haven't released anything good in the last 3 years, can you. The watch is a joke. The iPhone uses 2012 technology. The new MacBook Pros are a 'a bit thinner' version of the last ones, full of glitches. And now the 6 and 6S have a lot of issues. I know there were problems when Jobs was around, but Cook has a wrong vision for the company.Damaging? Have you seen Apples stock prices? They seem to be doing just fine.
Per curium does not mean that a decision unanimous. Bush v. Gore was per curium for instance (5-4).Forgive me if I'm missing the sarcasm. But, in case you are serious, 8-0 (9-0) "per curium" decisions happen often enough.
You just can't see they haven't released anything good in the last 3 years, can you. The watch is a joke. The iPhone uses 2012 technology. The new MacBook Pros are a 'a bit thinner' version of the last ones, full of glitches. And now the 6 and 6S have a lot of issues. I know there were problems when Jobs was around, but Cook has a wrong vision for the company.
I have never seen so much negative publicity for Apple in a year. Yea Tim Cook, I'm blaming this on you.
I'm sure Tim can't wait for 2016 to be over. I can't wait for him to be gone.
Ignoring this ruling completely. America's court system is a complete joke.
Aaahyabollah !!I'm sure somehow this will all be Tim Cooks fault, Apple can't innovate any more, blah blah blah![]()
Headline should make it more clear that this doesn't mean no fault on Samsung and no compensation for Apple.
Per curium does not mean that a decision unanimous. Bush v. Gore was per curium for instance (5-4).
But you're correct that unanimous decisions are common. In recent years, they've been about half of all decisions.
You obviously weren't in the market for a phone when the first iPhone came out?They copyrighted a touch screen rectangle though, I mean come on.