Yes but then again nothas anyone else seen this?
The main problem I see Microsoft having is competition with Apples M chipset. Now that they have started the roadmap for in house chips, Apple will be a force to be reckoned with. The M1 is only the first M chipset that they have produced and it’s already a beast.
Microsoft need to bring the thunder BIG time!
There is an overwhelming fact that regardless how fast the M1's etc are/will be MacOS will largely remain primarily a home/hobbyist platform. Even by Apples own metrics the number of professionals using high end pro apps/programs regularly is a small fraction of users.
While Apple can gouge the common man in to buying 2 or 3 devices and keep them in the ECO loop the M1's will ensure they keep the faithful and the trapped and claw back some defectors
Most of the world runs on cheap old chipsets and not the latest or greatest speed demons
I doubt anyone is paying $1000's on multiple annual software license (that play to the M1 strengths) and then running it on a M1 MBA let alone a SPX, these test are not the norm for most users
The Surface 2 in 1's fill a niche in the market for those that it suits to have a solution in one device and not multiple and so compete in a different demographic. The Arm chipset is a flimsy tangible commonality between MBA and SPX and shows off the raw power of M1's