Chrome books have replaced laptop for a lot of people.
Since the ipp is more powerful than chrome books, it is a laptop replacement for a lot of people.
I just wished Safari on the iPP would run Google Apps like they run on the Chromebook...
Chrome books have replaced laptop for a lot of people.
Since the ipp is more powerful than chrome books, it is a laptop replacement for a lot of people.
Your multitasking requirements are....unique. I think it's fair to point out that just because you can do something doesn't necessarily mean that you will or should do something. I was hesitant about not carrying my rMBP around with me (a device superior to the SP4 in just about every area you mentioned as being important to you) because I was concerned that I would lose some of the capabilities of my full and powerful laptop. Then I realized that I didn't use it for any of the things I thought I might want when on the road' it usually just sat in my hotel room or stayed in my bag while on the move. In other words, it was extra weight I didn't need to lug around if I didn't need to play three videos simultaneously, which I...never do.For tablet use which is primarily web surfing and media consumption I find the SP4 better and more capable than my Android then iPad tablets due to better multitasking, full desktop Chrome browser with plugins, ability to easily have four or more windowed Chrome browsers opened, play three if not more videos simultaneously vs one [...] SP4 multitasking three simultaneous YouTube, Twitch.tv and movie videos and virtually unlimited windowed Chrome browsers.
The entire premise is flawed because it assumes that tablets and laptops have standard definitions and that there is no overlap in function/capabilities. I get it though, it needs to degenerate into a schoolyard debate like XBox vs Playstation, or Marvel vs DC.Incorrect? How so?
iPad not being a tablet, or surface not a laptop?
I wonder how many people use the Surface Pro without the keyboard and kickstand or in portrait orientation. My guess is hardly anyone. Just like I'll bet hardly anyone detaches the screen on the Surface Book. Both devices are used as laptops running desktop (i.e. mouse and keyboard) software.
I wonder how many people use the Surface Pro without the keyboard and kickstand or in portrait orientation. My guess is hardly anyone.
I wonder how many people use the Surface Pro without the keyboard and kickstand or in portrait orientation. My guess is hardly anyone.
For those of you who like to compare who is better. Please think before comparing. It is like comparing an apple to an orange.
Assumption confirmed.And if you really want a laptop and a tablet. Go get yourself a MacBook Pro and the iPad Pro and you can enjoyboth.
I think that is a fair assumption. Microsoft themselves avoid showcasing the Surface Pro as a standalone tablet. Every Surface Pro ad has the TypeCover prominently displayed and used. There isn't a Surface ad that doesn't have the TypeCover. A company wants their ads to show their products at their best... for the Surface Pro, that is as a notebook, not a tablet.I wonder how many people use the Surface Pro without the keyboard and kickstand or in portrait orientation. My guess is hardly anyone. Just like I'll bet hardly anyone detaches the screen on the Surface Book. Both devices are used as laptops running desktop (i.e. mouse and keyboard) software.
Why would I want to use without kickstand? I can't live without it now! It's built-in and much more stable than the smart cover on my ipad air.I wonder how many people use the Surface Pro without the keyboard and kickstand or in portrait orientation. My guess is hardly anyone. Just like I'll bet hardly anyone detaches the screen on the Surface Book. Both devices are used as laptops running desktop (i.e. mouse and keyboard) software.
Wrong. That's like saying car brand A convertible and brand B convertible aren't convertibles. Both cars fall into convertible form factor but where they differ are performance and capabilities. For tablet use which is primarily web surfing and media consumption I find the SP4 better and more capable than my Android then iPad tablets due to better multitasking, full desktop Chrome browser with plugins, ability to easily have four or more windowed Chrome browsers opened, play three if not more videos simultaneously vs one, adjustable kickstand, non-distorting front facing speakers at near to max volume, superior keyboard/trackpad/fingerprint cover, flexibility with playing media sources from not only internet streaming but also internal storage, SD card, USB flash or WIFI network storage and productivity is unmatched due to professional software availability.
SP4 multitasking three simultaneous YouTube, Twitch.tv and movie videos and virtually unlimited windowed Chrome browsers.
![]()
TouchWiz/Android multitasking a close 2nd limited to two simultaneous Twitch.tv and movie videos and two mobile Chrome browsers.
![]()
Why would I want to use without kickstand? I can't live without it now! It's built-in and much more stable than the smart cover on my ipad air.
Well...both Apple and Microsoft would love to play in the other's turf.I agree with the statement. Surface Pro is a laptop (where you have to pay extra for the keyboard), and the iPad Pro is a tablet.
However... (paraphrasing what the companies are saying)
Microsoft: "Surface Pro is the tablet that can replace your laptop."
Apple: "The iPad Pro is a replacement for a notebook or desktop for many people."
No wonder everybody is confused.
My point is it seems most people are using the Surface more like a laptop than a tablet. Nothing wrong with that, just an observation.Why would I want to use without kickstand? I can't live without it now! It's built-in and much more stable than the smart cover on my ipad air.
Well...both Apple and Microsoft would love to play in the other's turf.
Funny thing is, they're both right. IPP can replace a laptop for many people - big processor, decent storage. And SP is a tablet that can replace your laptop (it that case, because at it's heart, it really is a laptop, perhaps more than it is a tablet!)
I wonder how many people use the Surface Pro without the keyboard and kickstand or in portrait orientation. My guess is hardly anyone.
The Surface Pro is the best modern and versatile form factor. I'd like to see two type cover options, one with extended battery which existed before as a ~1.1# Surface Power Cover for traveling without easy access to outlet and a second with extended battery and discrete GPU for compute processing or gaming. And, since the CPU is in the tablet and the dGPU is in the keyboard the heat is spread out instead of localized in one hot spot.
I wonder how many people use the Surface Pro without the keyboard and kickstand or in portrait orientation. My guess is hardly anyone.
I wonder how many people use the Surface Pro without the keyboard and kickstand or in portrait orientation. My guess is hardly anyone. Just like I'll bet hardly anyone detaches the screen on the Surface Book. Both devices are used as laptops running desktop (i.e. mouse and keyboard) software.
I think MS already created that device in the Surface book, so I doubt they will be upgrading the type covers. That would be too much overlap in the product lines I would imagine.
I expect that if the Book survives it's teething problems and becomes a full up line, we will eventually see better battery life in the tablet in future generations.
What I have realized since having owned the surface and now the iPad pro , they both weigh in at around 1.1 kg. That is laptop territory, this is with KB attached . In some ways you might as well carry a 13 MBA, better machine than both. Don't forget the iPad Air 2 is around 440grams. A very good reason to own a tablet.
The more I think about it, the 12 retina MacBook is such a good product in terms of weight and capability. And is winning me over compared to surface/ipp