Surface is a LAPTOP & iPad Pro is a TABLET. PERIOD

MBA has a crappy display and the 12" rMB has a crappy keyboard that's almost as bad as the smart keyboard, you can't use either as a tablet without keyboard attached and Safari scrolling is laggy where even Edge browser on the entry level Surface 3 on sale for $479 with type cover is faster than Safari on the high end rMBP.

you can't use a iPad pro as a tablet without KB? It works better as a tablet without the KB due to the weight. I like holding my tablet in my hands.
 
“I think if you’re looking at a PC, why would you buy a PC anymore? No really, why would you buy one?” Yes, the iPad Pro is a replacement for a notebook or a desktop for many, many people...” (Tim Cook interview in The Telegraph).
I am sure you have an explanation for the quoted text as well, haven't you?

You beat me to it. As far as Tim Cook is concerned its a laptop replacement...errrr....ummm... A WINDOWS-based laptop replacement that is. :) Not an Apple laptop replacement though. Oh no. Hilarous.
 
Wrong. That's like saying car brand A convertible and brand B convertible aren't convertibles. Both cars fall into convertible form factor but where they differ are performance and capabilities. For tablet use which is primarily web surfing and media consumption I find the SP4 better and more capable than my Android then iPad tablets due to better multitasking, full desktop Chrome browser with plugins, ability to easily have four or more windowed Chrome browsers opened, play three if not more videos simultaneously vs one, adjustable kickstand, non-distorting front facing speakers at near to max volume, superior keyboard/trackpad/fingerprint cover, flexibility with playing media sources from not only internet streaming but also internal storage, SD card, USB flash or LAN network storage and productivity is unmatched due to professional software availability and ability to output to external large screen display.

SP4 multitasking three simultaneous YouTube, Twitch.tv and movie videos and virtually unlimited windowed Chrome browsers.
Windows10Multitasking1_zpscpcsknko.png


TouchWiz/Android multitasking a close 2nd limited to two simultaneous Twitch.tv and movie videos and two mobile Chrome browsers.
Screenshot_2015-09-05-08-21-55a_zpsuarna48c.png
These are actually great examples of multitasking. Compared to the iPad pro, much more sophisticated indeed..

Do you notice any type of lag when having so many apps open and simultaneously running?
 
I wonder how many people use the Surface Pro without the keyboard and kickstand or in portrait orientation. My guess is hardly anyone. Just like I'll bet hardly anyone detaches the screen on the Surface Book. Both devices are used as laptops running desktop (i.e. mouse and keyboard) software.
Couldn't agree more.

So many people tout the surface pro as the best hybrid, yet nobody ever really talks about using it as an actual TABLET.

IMO, it shines as a light laptop with a unique and cool form factor, but questionable if the tablet use is as good.
 
My point is it seems most people are using the Surface more like a laptop than a tablet. Nothing wrong with that, just an observation.



It seems to me the Microsoft is moving more towards laptop than tablet with the Surface lines. Even so I still think their marketing is a bit confused. One minute the 'enemy' is the iPad, the next it's a MacBook Air. Also if the Surface Pro can replace your laptop what's the point of the Surface Book? Some say Apple is confused but iPP and MacBook run two different operating systems. Surface Pro and Book so not. That to me seems more confusing.
I suspect the enemy isn't the iPad or the MBA...it's anyone that threatens their ecosystem. That puts Apple in a funny position - they're big enough that MS wants to be there with Office and support for their hardware, but they're also big enough that they threaten Microsoft's hegemony. So they run ads swatting both the iPad and the MBA while promoting software that runs on them.
 
Couldn't agree more.

So many people tout the surface pro as the best hybrid, yet nobody ever really talks about using it as an actual TABLET.

IMO, it shines as a light laptop with a unique and cool form factor, but questionable if the tablet use is as good.

I like using the Surface Pro as a tablet for consuming media. It has a big, vibrant, touch responsive screen, and it's as good as any other tablet I've used for watching movies, reading emails or PDFs or books or the news, surfing the web, etc.

I agree with the statement. Surface Pro is a laptop (where you have to pay extra for the keyboard), and the iPad Pro is a tablet.

However... (paraphrasing what the companies are saying)
Microsoft: "Surface Pro is the tablet that can replace your laptop."
Apple: "The iPad Pro is a replacement for a notebook or desktop for many people."

No wonder everybody is confused.

They're both tablets. The confusion is in the wording.

The iPad Pro is a tablet that can replace what many people USE a laptop for. So can any iPad for that matter. The compromise is that it can't FULLY replace what a laptop or desktop can do since it only runs iOS and has limited support for external accessories. Of course many people either don't need, or necessarily want those things, especially from their tablet.

Meanwhile, the Surface Pro is a tablet that can FULLY replace a laptop or desktop. The compromise is that it can be more complicated to use and operate, has inferior battery life and a smaller touch optimized ecosystem compared to the iOS/iPad platform.

I totally get why some people don't need the power or complexity of a desktop operating system and full blown applications. Or why other people prefer having two or more devices to meet their needs.
Personally, I like having one device that meets all three needs - a tablet for consumption, a desktop for when I want a big monitor and full keyboard and mouse, and a laptop for productivity on the go.
 
Tried the Surface Book but it's not for me. Seems like the design was compromised to appease laptop people who aren't going to buy it anyway. It's like trying to get people still stuck on horse and carriage to convert to car. The clamshell laptop form factor is old and tired and hasn't changed much since my Sony VAIO from like 2001. The Lenovo Yoga hinge is better since it folds flat, it's missing the kickstand and 3 hr battery life in tablet mode is inadequate. Surface Pro will be superior with dGPU and extended battery option. If I'm going deal with the old clamshell I'd go with something like the upcoming Thinkpad P50 that's a mobile server/workstation for heavy processing and virtualization with Xeon class CPU, 64GB DRAM and dGPU.

Oh, I agree that the surface book has its flaws. I chose not to buy one as well and picked up the powerhouse Vaio Z Canvas tablet instead. I was just pointing out the fact that as long as the Book exists, there is no way MS will ever make a dGPU or battery typecover for a Surface Pro. That would cannabilize too many sales.
 
These are actually great examples of multitasking. Compared to the iPad pro, much more sophisticated indeed..

Do you notice any type of lag when having so many apps open and simultaneously running?

Virtually none on either device.

On the SP4 YouTube and movie playback take advantage of hardware accelerated decoding so with both videos running the CPU clock is near lower range at under 1GHz. Twitch.tv feels more software processed and heavier but even then with all three videos running plus other stuff it's still not hitting max clock and utilization is about half. Core M-6Y30 is very capable so you'll likely run out of 4GB DRAM before you run out of CPU cycles for typical workloads. With everything running I was just under 3GB DRAM utiilized.

Where TouchWiz Android on Galaxy Tab S2 shines is UI with minimal windows borders to maximize use of screen space and can play a game such as Need for Speed Most Wanted fine while watching Twitch.tv and movie. Have yet to try on SP4 Core M3-6Y30 but on a Lenovo Helix 2 with similar Core M-5Y10 it didn't fare as well for this scenario.

Screenshot_2015-07-26-11-41-04a_zpsu7yxfibt.png


One correction. TouchWiz Android can have more than two side by side Chrome browsers.

Screenshot_2015-09-16-12-28-40_zpsi0osegg8.png
 
Last edited:
That is the orientation that makes most sense when I used it. For the surface. Hardly ever did I use it without the KB.

Though I have the opposite problem with the IPP, I like to use the pro in portrait with the KB folded behind the iPad , but due to the design of it, with 1/2 being thicker due to the KB, the left half of the Smart Cover has a big gap to the iPad pro, and it just feels wrong when I hold it. It does not sit flat like the iPad Air Smart Cover. Very annoying and very surprised apple designed it like that. So I am forced to remove my ipp keyboard cover 1/2 the time. Now I know why the surface has the kick stand.

I can post a picture if that does not make sense
Is there a reason you need to have the keyboard attached to the iPP when using it in portrait? I don't have the keyboard but the only time I use my Smart Cover is when I'm traveling, if my iPad is lying on a surface that could scratch it or if I'm using it to prop up the device when watching movies or something. If I'm just lying on the couch or in bed I don't have anything attached to my iPad.
 
Virtually none on either device.

On the SP4 YouTube and movie playback take advantage of hardware accelerated decoding so with both videos running the CPU clock is near lower range at under 1GHz. Twitch.tv feels more software processed and heavier but even then with all three videos running plus other stuff it's still not hitting max clock and utilization is about half. Core M-6Y30 is very capable so you'll likely run out of 4GB DRAM before you run out of CPU cycles for typical workloads. With everything running I was just under 3GB DRAM utiilized.

Where TouchWiz Android on Galaxy Tab S2 shines is UI with minimal windows borders to maximize use of screen space and can play a game such as Need for Speed Most Wanted fine while watching Twitch.tv and movie. Have yet to try on SP4 Core M3-6Y30 but on a Lenovo Helix 2 with similar Core M-5Y10 it didn't fare as well for this scenario.

Screenshot_2015-07-26-11-41-04a_zpsu7yxfibt.png


One correction. TouchWiz Android can have more than two side by side Chrome browsers.

Screenshot_2015-09-16-12-28-40_zpsi0osegg8.png
Quite amazing...color me impressed. My wish is that with ios10, we will see a more refined multitasking experience.

I doubt we will ever see to the extent as shown above, but perhaps the ability to run 2 of the same apps side by side, and at least 3 side by side by side apps running simultaneously
 
You beat me to it. As far as Tim Cook is concerned its a laptop replacement...errrr....ummm... A WINDOWS-based laptop replacement that is. :) Not an Apple laptop replacement though. Oh no. Hilarous.
I believe the iPad will eventually replace the Macbook as well. Tim Cook knows this better any onion, but he obviously can't say it at this stage because it might compromise sales of their Macs, but when the time comes, I have no doubt that Apple will be more than happy to have the iPad cannibalise sales of their Macs.
 
Quite amazing...color me impressed. My wish is that with ios10, we will see a more refined multitasking experience.

I doubt we will ever see to the extent as shown above, but perhaps the ability to run 2 of the same apps side by side, and at least 3 side by side by side apps running simultaneously

I personally don't understand the use case. One can't focus on that many things at once. I remember I used to try to max out space on a 4K screen. I had a game, a movie some browsers and other crap but it just became more of an annoyance and I could only really focus on one thing at a time.
 
I personally don't understand the use case. One can't focus on that many things at once. I remember I used to try to max out space on a 4K screen. I had a game, a movie some browsers and other crap but it just became more of an annoyance and I could only really focus on one thing at a time.
Right - I really like slideover on the IPP but I guess I don't really get the utility of lots of windows open on a 13" screen. Others have mentioned that they'd like to drive multiple monitors with the IPP and then have lots of windows open, but that's not the kind of beast this is.

Now...what should we expect to see in IOS10 on the IPP? I'd bet you'll see the ability to run multiple windows of the same app. The obvious candidate for this is Safari - but how about multiple instances of Word, for example - highlight and drag text from one instance to the other. Or pick your favorite drawing package - grab the objects from one canvas and drag them to the other.

Once you've opened the possibility of multiple windows, the options multiply.
 
I personally don't understand the use case. One can't focus on that many things at once. I remember I used to try to max out space on a 4K screen. I had a game, a movie some browsers and other crap but it just became more of an annoyance and I could only really focus on one thing at a time.

It really depends on an individual basis and it really makes a difference if there is some relationship among what is happening in each of the windows - a game, a browser, and a movie are all quite independent of each other whereas a text document, a spreadsheet, and a presentation (or multiples of each) may be used simultaneously for one purpose.
 
Supposedly iPad and iPP claim to be PC replacements but it's taboo when bringing up PC capabilities. Multiple instances of browser windows, multitasking different software, etc. are very common and basic PC tasks. I also regularly virtualize other OS' and devices. People also forget that some of these devices can output to large screen displays. It's like the reverse gear example on a car. Many might not use it often but no way can they live without it when it's needed.
 
Supposedly iPad and iPP claim to be PC replacements but it's taboo when bringing up PC capabilities. Multiple instances of browser windows, multitasking different software, etc. are very common and basic PC tasks. I also regularly virtualize other OS' and devices. People also forget that some of these devices can output to large screen displays. It's like the reverse gear example on a car. Many might not use it often but no way can they live without it when it's needed.
Interesting example - but look at it this way: there are PC users that run a browser and an email client, and not much more. There are others that may occasionally use a word processor, finance program or spreadsheet, but generally stick with the aforementioned browser and email program. For them, an iPad or IPP does everything they need, in a smaller package, and they may find the experience superior to the more complex PC paradigm.

As for me, I practically never run more than one browser window - although I may run a gazillion tabs in the one window I have open. Not saying I'm "right" or anything, but that's how I use the machine. Others use it differently.

But I do hope Apple allows multiple instances of a particular program to run side-by-side in the IPP - I'd love to touch-drag text from one Word or Pages document to the other.

As for the other tasks you mention - virtual OS instances and multiple external monitors - I suspect for those use cases, a PC or Mac will be your go-to machine for some time to come.
 
I have seen so many news article, youtube videos, forum thread comparing the both. Some really liked the Surface and some the iPad Pro. Many of the arguments just sounded so stupid to me and clearly just trying to put the other down.

For those of you who like to compare who is better. Please think before comparing. It is like comparing an apple to an orange.

The Surface is a laptop. It has the extra capability to function like a tablet, but it is not build to be a full tablet. PERIOD. So, if you need a laptop more than a tablet, than this is your choice, go for it. Don't bother with the iPad Pro.

The iPad Pro is a tablet. It is made as such and marketed as such. No one ever said it is a laptop replacement. It is not made to be a laptop. The operating system is clearly made to function as a tablet, not a laptop. If you think you will need laptop functions, don't buy the iPad Pro, it is not for you. But if you think, you need it as a big and powerful tablet, go for it. This is your device.


And if you really want a laptop and a tablet. Go get yourself a MacBook Pro and the iPad Pro and you can enjoy both.

My iPad Pro is actually going to replace my laptop for everyday non-power crunching use. There are enough projects I can do on the IPP to get by comfortably.

If I need to do serious video editing or the like, I'll just use the iMac at home.

I really do with OSX-Touch or iOS-Pro would be a reality very soon, but for now I can manage.
 
Quite amazing...color me impressed. My wish is that with ios10, we will see a more refined multitasking experience.

This is ridiculous. How can anyone consider that mass of windows randomly dispersed and overlapping a refined experience? It is utterly impractical. Why would you want so many random windows all over the place not showing their full content all the time? It would take a very specific use case (sports commentator or stock broker?) to be able to multitask to that extent.

Even as a developer who uses multiple windows simultaneously, I never considered mucking around with multiple windows refined.

Good grief.
 
Last edited:
This is ridiculous. How can anyone consider that mass of windows randomly dispersed and overlapping a refined experience? It is utterly impractical. Why would you want to many random windows all over the place not showing their full content all the time? It would take a very specific use case (sports commentator or stock broker?) to be able to multitask to that extent.

Even as a developer who uses multiple windows simultaneously, I never considered mucking around with multiple windows refined.

Good grief.

Of course some have also claimed there's no need for more than 3.5" display, 1GB DRAM, split view multitasking, precision pen input, etc. And, because some don't know how to utilize it or output to a large screen it's useless for everyone else.
 
Is there a reason you need to have the keyboard attached to the iPP when using it in portrait? I don't have the keyboard but the only time I use my Smart Cover is when I'm traveling, if my iPad is lying on a surface that could scratch it or if I'm using it to prop up the device when watching movies or something. If I'm just lying on the couch or in bed I don't have anything attached to my iPad.

With my iPad Air 2 there is no reason to remove the Smart Cover ever. To be honest with around 5 years of iPad and 7 years of iPhone ownership.....make that any apple product I have ever owned, never have I had a cover that I needed to remove due to design, that being being the difference between well designed cover and a dock.

Just from habits, and user experience of owning apple iPads, the natural response is to fold the Smart Cover behind the iPad if I go portrait. The user experience should not change, the fault is with the smart keyboard cover and its design, apples answer to the kickstand.

Guess we are different . I've never seen the need to remove the Smart Cover off my iPad Air, it provides protection when closed and grip when used in portrait for me.
 
I believe the iPad will eventually replace the Macbook as well. Tim Cook knows this better any onion, but he obviously can't say it at this stage because it might compromise sales of their Macs, but when the time comes, I have no doubt that Apple will be more than happy to have the iPad cannibalise sales of their Macs.

If Tim can sell you man iPad that weighs more than a laptop with a keyboard cover attached and costs about the same, he is a genius , however he spins it. Cause there is more profit in an iPad than there is in a MacBook . That would make tim very happy.
 
Microsoft owns about 20% of my employer and we specialize in Microsoft enterprise software. The upper level managers at my employer all have Surface Pros as their standard computer. I'm just an underling, but I strongly considered getting an Surface Pro, also. However, I noticed that about 80% of the time, people use the Surface Pro the same way they would use any standard Windows laptop. That led me to wonder: why even by a tablet if you are going to use it in the exact same way (software and form factor) as a laptop? You can get a Windows laptop that does 80% of what people I've seen use a Surface Pro for, at about 65% of the Surface Pro's price. That's why I think of the Surface Pro as being more of a laptop than a tablet. Also, I have tried the Surface Pro 3 and 4 in portrait mode, and their aspect ratios don't seem to be made for portrait orientation.
 
Microsoft owns about 20% of my employer and we specialize in Microsoft enterprise software. The upper level managers at my employer all have Surface Pros as their standard computer. I'm just an underling, but I strongly considered getting an Surface Pro, also. However, I noticed that about 80% of the time, people use the Surface Pro the same way they would use any standard Windows laptop. That led me to wonder: why even by a tablet if you are going to use it in the exact same way (software and form factor) as a laptop? You can get a Windows laptop that does 80% of what people I've seen use a Surface Pro for, at about 65% of the Surface Pro's price. That's why I think of the Surface Pro as being more of a laptop than a tablet. Also, I have tried the Surface Pro 3 and 4 in portrait mode, and their aspect ratios don't seem to be made for portrait orientation.

That's were clever marketing comes into play. I returned my surface for that reason, by the time you get all the accessories to make a tablet a replacement for a laptop, a laptop is a much cleaner solution. Not to mention a tablet that size is awkward in portrait usage.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Back
Top