Mac 128
macrumors 603
I didn't say Apple tested their IPX7 rated watch. But an IPX8 rating requires the watch be tested. Just like a jeweler has to test the watch after they replace the battery to make sure it's been assembled correctly. And that's my point. Even 1 in every 1000 of 3,000,000 watches sold will slow them down, especially if they have a failure. And if they don't test them all, they run the risk of failure with the consumer, which would be catastrophic for a brand new product launch. Then there's the issue of servicing the watch to check the seals -- clearly something Apple didn't want to worry about with this first model. So even if it could meet a higher standard, there's the added burden of labeling it as such, so Apple took the safest way to market.Why would Apple do this? I know some high end/low volume manufactures do test (usually atmospheric pressure instead of water) each case individually. Also this is usually reserved for ATM10 and higher (or is it deeper 😀) models. It would be a huge waste of time and resources for Apple to test eachWatch, especially in a water pressure tank. Apple will just do (and does now with IPx7) what all other volume manufacture do and pull 1 of every 1000 to 10,000 to test.
Watch, especially in a water pressure tank. Apple will just do (and does now with IPx7) what all other volume manufacture do and pull 1 of every 1000 to 10,000 to test.