Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Meh not a clone. I had a mechanical Tissot watch in the 80s with the Apple Watch shape. I think it was called Tissot Twotimer Sport Edition.
Put an Apple Watch, this watch, and your Tissot side-by-side, the two first ones look much more similar than the third one.
 
I guess they didn't use VantaBlack on the dial for the pictures considering that if they did, it wouldn't be reflecting light.
 
The same reason as the Apple Watch Edition failed this will too. People don't want to drop $30k on a smart watch because smart technology gets outdated far too fast. Mechanical watches can go for even more than that because even in 20 years they'll still be just as good
I would not be surprised if Apple sold more of the Apple Watch Edition than it expected. But Edition sales volume was never the intent. Its intent was extremely effective marketing and positioning of the rest of the product line at the premium it enjoys today.
 
  • Like
Reactions: the future
I would not be surprised if Apple sold more of the Apple Watch Edition than it expected. But Edition sales volume was never the intent. Its intent was extremely effective marketing and positioning of the rest of the product line at the premium it enjoys today.
Precisely. It also made the initial AW a fashion item rather than a tech gadget.
 
  • Like
Reactions: the future
At least those others efforts aren’t trolling for attention. Not to mention many of those actually retain their value if cared for because they are iconic.
I'll respectfully disagree that bulky timepieces made out of precious metals, potentially covered in gemstones and/or showing off visible clockworks aren't "trolling for attention." I love my old Seiko to bits, but even before wfh I didn't really need it to tell time. Even at <$200, it's jewelry.

FWIW, it's the MR article writer's opinion that this watch is "poking fun" at Apple. What I read on the manufacturer website probably fell just short of flattery, but it looked sincere to me. I didn't see any sort of poking fun or irreverent trolling here at all, but maybe I'm missing it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: manu chao
You might want to apply this to 1000$ plastic handbags of well known brands. Worth the money or you buy it, if you can afford it and like it?

In this case, you get at least an outside of white gold, which has quite some value as precious metal.
I don’t see where it claims to have white gold. The case is stainless steel with DLC. Maybe the hands? Anyway, my criticism is the churlishness of conceiving this and then following through. Certainly not how I would spend my money, were I to have it spend that way. Not sympathetic to overpriced anything, but there is a point where if it’s worth it, you will pay for it.
 
There is no doubt a lot of craftsmanship in this watch, looks amazing on the inside but having that mechanical loading wheel showing all the time would do my head in! I would constantly be restarting the watch to try and get rid of it!
 
Put an Apple Watch, this watch, and your Tissot side-by-side, the two first ones look much more similar than the third one.

just talking about the rectangular aspect. That’s been around for decades. But I’d love the Apple Watch to be as thin as the Tissot Twotimer was. That might not be possible as the home button and crown would become too small.
 
Awesome! Now I can buy a $30,000 Swiss clone of a smart watch that’s originally made by slave labor in China. Without any of the “smart” features the AW has. Now, discerning customers have the choice of a high end timepiece like this

1612381415583.png


or the 30k AW clone. Tough choice!
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: gnasher729
I'll respectfully disagree that bulky timepieces made out of precious metals, potentially covered in gemstones and/or showing off visible clockworks aren't "trolling for attention." I love my old Seiko to bits, but even before wfh I didn't really need it to tell time. Even at <$200, it's jewelry.

FWIW, it's the MR article writer's opinion that this watch is "poking fun" at Apple. What I read on the manufacturer website probably fell just short of flattery, but it looked sincere to me. I didn't see any sort of poking fun or irreverent trolling here at all, but maybe I'm missing it.
I own a Rolex. It was inherited. Nothing flashy but it’s a Rolex and had it been kept with paperwork and not worn while taking apart machines it would be worth considerably more than the value it was appraised at. Which is more than it was bought for in the 70’s. I wore it until I had it appraised and then decided I don’t need a $10k watch on my wrist. It’s worth more as a family keepsake.
As far as the Final Update, sans the “loading symbol”, sure its flattery. However, that’s just my opinion.
 
Now, discerning customers have the choice of a high end timepiece like this

View attachment 1724425

or the 30k AW clone. Tough choice!
From the design alone I cannot tell whether that is $500 ‘East-Asian’ watch or a $30k Swiss one. But looking closer I see the word Genêve, so I guess the Made in Switzerland label adds a couple of zeros to the price.
 
Honestly I'm over it, some people don't have food to eat, homeless, and here we are with another fancy useless thing. The worst spent money.. The elite has to stop thinking only about themselves.
The same can be said for any car, that is more expensive than 10000 Dollars or Euros.
 
They're making 50 of them. Not 50 million, or 50k, just 50. There are plenty more than 50 people who can spend $30k on something silly. I don't think it's the best way to spend $30k - I'd probably drop $4k for a Tudor Black Bay 58 and use the rest for something else - or donate some of it. But point is, it's a joke, doesn't really hurt anybody, and they'll sell out.

It would be cool to get more Vantablack dial watches on the market though... at somewhat more attainable prices.
 
Mind = blown. That is a fantastic idea. Could Apple prevent this legally somehow, though?

IANAL, but I doubt it. There are tons of unofficial watch bands out there, including ones with licensed properties like Disney/Star Wars, so I doubt that making a third-party watch itself work with a similar mechanism is something that can be legally stopped.

Think how many different companies over the years have made building toys that can connect to LEGO bricks. I imagine that something similar applies here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: the future
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.