I doubt Samsung will go face ID only. They have a tendency to go for 3 solutions instead of one. Look at the S8: charging - USB-C and wireless (s7 also); headphones - wireless and wired jack; unlock - fingerprint, face, and retina scan. I guess they want to give people options.
Even though Face ID fares better for most of the users, it still doesn't work for twins or siblings who look very similar (which is about 1% of the population).
I have to say Samsung makes some amazing hardware. Don't you wish Apple would squeeze in all that choice into an iPhone?
I could have swore that apple tried to do this but could not get it for the release. I don't double we'll hear, "and we've heard your voice so we are bringing touchid back" despite only taking it off the list because they could not get it working as planned.You think Apple would remove a feature and then bring it back?
Better hold on to your headphones.
is the higher cost of facial recognition worth it over touch id? honest question, as I've been perfectly happy with touch id the past 2 years.
You think Apple would remove a feature and then bring it back?
Better hold on to your headphones.
I would guess that there is already enough data to justify another attempt at the belt and suspenders approach to Auth on iPhone.
Actually, i first thought no way. Then upon further thought, I could see them introduce it for lower priced models and leave Face ID for the expensive models.
If Apple was lying to us about not investing in fingerprint tech and we find it in next year's iPhone X successor, I will be sorely disappointed in Apple...
If Apple was lying to us about not investing in fingerprint tech and we find it in next year's iPhone X successor, I will be sorely disappointed in Apple...
I'd love to know how many people here complaining about the problems with FaceID (and how in-display TouchID would be better) actually own the iPhone X.
My guess is none.
Even though Face ID fares better for most of the users, it still doesn't work for twins or siblings who look very similar (which is about 1% of the population) and children under the age of 14 (which is a lot). So I believe Apple will have to incorporate Touch ID under display at some stage, probably not too far in the future, to compensate for this.
I'd love to know how many people here complaining about the problems with FaceID (and how in-display TouchID would be better) actually own the iPhone X.
My guess is none.
Fingerprint sensor is much better than Face ID.
I could have swore that apple tried to do this but could not get it for the release.
With all this talk about under-the-display fingerprint sensors, I wonder if it'd still work with a cracked display.
Since upcoming phones will most likely have edge-to-edge displays, a cracked display might just render the fingerprint module useless.