
that Acer has a slower CPU speed & you wouldn't notice the difference with an i5 over the Duo unless running multi threaded tasks and turbo boost kicks in all the time.
also has a 5400 rpm drive, Intel graphics, but come on the MBA is much more better designed. i would say at stock configurations the MBA is better specced and has the great design going for it. could maybe be $100 cheaper though
Posts like these just amaze me. That's like comparing a GM to an Audi.
That piece has Intel graphics (lammmme), it's 1.1 INCHES THICK, and weighs over 3 pounds. And I would love to see it get 8 hours of battery life... probably closer to 5. I think $300 extra for the MBA is fully justified. Plus PC netbooks are just plain ugly and chunky.
please explain to me how the nvidia GPU will be 100% utilizied when the MBA has a POS U9400? i doubt that garbage cpu can even utilize 100% of the 4500HD, both can play 1080p videos, but thats about all, onboard graphics is crap in general
1.1" thick? omg you cant cut yourself because its not sharp enough? wont fit in your laptop bag? stop using an envelope has your bag then, actually the acer will still fit in an envelope so nvm continue using the envelope
over 3 lbs?!?!, how the hell do people carry MBP 15+?
yes i would love to see the MBA get its rated battery life as well
oh BTW the U9400 gets 964 marks
the i5 gets 1,132 marks
http://www.cpubenchmark.net/mid_range_cpus.html
at least the i5 has turbo boost, the mba doesnt have crap all, not even HT
That Acer Aspire you listed is over $700, not half the price. It's also 25% heavier, has a 5400 rpm HDD instead of SSD, is made of plastic, runs Windows 7, and has crappy Intel integrated graphics. If you don't see the difference then the MBA is definitely not for you.
Enjoy your Acer.
you keep forgetting
the Acer can be upgraded to a 256GB sandforce controled SSD while still being cheaper
the acer already comes with 4GB of ram
windows 7 isnt the only OS that can run on the system, ubuntu can be installed in about 12 minutes
the laptop is made of aluminum
the crappy integrated graphics gives better battery life, battery life being more important in an ultra portable than gaming power (the extra gaming power in the MBA cant even be used since the cpu is so damn slow)
the acer also has more USB Ports, HDMI, VGA, Gigabit Ethernet, and a card reader, these items are far more useful than being more shiny.
what is being super thin and shiny going to do for you when you need to get pictures off an SD card?