Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I'd have no problem with this if Apple was fair about their upgrade prices. But with their RAM and SSD upgrade prices being through the roof, in addition to the fact that they don't deduct the default components they are removing from the price of the upgraded components. I'd say it's a pretty ****** move by Apple towards it's mostly loyal customers.
 
If people want a LEGO computer, they'd buy a box. If people want slim, nice, eyc, they'd buy a Mac. This news really shouldn't affect Mac-buyers.
 
I bought the Unibody 15" MacBook Pro the week it came out. I've used it for almost 4 solid years, on a daily basis. The battery is still working great, no need to replace it. The only upgrade I did, was the RAM (2 to 4 Gb) and the harddisk (250 Gb to 500 Gb hybrid), which was a very easy upgrade to do myself.

I already ordered the new retina MacBook Pro. I'm planning to use it for at least 3 years. I'm happy I ordered it with 16 Gb because then I probably won't ever need to upgrade the RAM. I'm a bit worried that a 512 Gb SSD won't be enough in the future. On the other hand it seems that Thunderbolt / USB3 will make it easy to use extremely fast external storage.

It seems that I will be losing the easy access to battery, RAM and HDD, but gaining a lot of expansion options using Thunderbolt & USB 3. I don't care about the battery, if used properly the battery should last. Sure, it's expensive, but I'm happy to see them putting the "Pro" back in MacBook Pro. Way ahead of the competition, just like in the PowerBook G4 days!
 
A RAM upgrade to 16GB is $200 ($180 for students) - much less than it used to be, from what I remember. I think I paid a little less than that for an 8GB upgrade from a 3rd party supplier last year. Not a bad deal.
 
I'm no engineering, but isn't it incredible that the new MBP has such powerful components (esp. graphics card) in such a small form factor? The biggest innovation could be the cooling, not the screen.
 
So a year from now if need a larger SSD and prices drop I would then have to sell this and buy a new one :eek: Not for me!!!

I'll stick with the 1/4" thicker model that is upgradeable and I can, at todays prices, upgrade myself to 16GB ram and a 500GB SSD for and save hundreds (and more if I upgrade 6-12 months from now instead). I'll handle the burden of the extra pound along with the built-in optical drive - and have the included 500gb drive as a external backup
 


Ahem.

Back in the 1990s Apple used to use proprietary components, internal connections and ports, which was one of the causes of Apple's march toward becoming an endangered species. Macs were expensive, and difficult to repair with expensive SCSI disks, weird Nubus and Comm Slot sockets (ATA and PCI later on, granted) and strange power supply connections.

When Steve came back, the propitiatory connections began to disappear, until you could use standard ATA disks, any standard CD drive, USB, etc. The earlier Intel Macs had the most numerous standard components, but it seems we're heading back the other way again in the strive to shave 0.0001" off each corner. Is it really worth having a computer that's a few percent thinner, that'll cost you hundreds to repair when the SSD wears out? Or if the RAM fails the whole logic board needs replacing? Don't tell me a proprietary SSD slot is necessary, the standard one worked just fine in the Air. Why is the battery glued into the base of the MBP? Surely double sided tape works just as well as it has done in the iPhone and iPad for the last few years. Is a hard disk with custom firmware in the iMac really required? Why do the fans go 747 when you put your own hard disk in?

I don't like the direction Apple is heading with the lack of standard components. History's shown the more proprietary they become, the more of an outsider they become, too.
 
Solid State Device/Drive == flash. Apple just doesn't use the typical drive enclosure box; they save space this way.

It's not so much space saving as it is consumer screwing. There are plenty of more standard interfaces like pcie or msata that could easily fit into similar space. But they want to make sure nobody but them takes your money. Greedy Apple tactics are nothing new.

As for RAM, this is pure bs. There are plenty of smaller thinner machines out there that have user-upgradable RAM. Many Air imitators for example. They want you to pay a major premium upfront for their memory and then throw away the machine once the RAM amount in it becomes insufficient for newer software. Just Apple being its greedy self again.

I like the fact that I can replace certain things with parts of my own choosing so I won't be buying this machine for sure. That and the fact that I refuse to pay over $2K for a laptop.
 
I find that awful, too. The only problems I've ever had with my MacBooks/Powerbooks have been the batteries. They always die. ALWAYS. I've had to replace the battery in every machine I've used since 1999.

What happens when this MBP I'm using right now (Late 2011) loses all reasonable battery function? It's going to suck because I'm not really ifixit-compatible. Not that many people are -- in the grand scheme.

Then you presumably do exactly what you currently do with the Macbook Air or Macbook Pro: you buy a new battery from Apple and the price includes installation!

http://www.apple.com/support/macbookair/service/battery/

Come on folks, this isn't a new problem or solution. In fact when you compare prices Apple charge (in the UK) £101 for an old-style replacement Macbook Pro battery and only £99 for the newer, Apple-installed replacement battery.
 
Is it just me, or is it astounding that an entire computer is packed into essentially that single misshapen motherboard? How technology has progressed.

Even more interesting, but not shocking, is that this is basically a screen with a battery.
 
Is Ram interchangeable in the MBPR?

Nope. Not according to this article and many others. The RAM is now soldered onto the logic board.

Hopefully soldering the RAM to the logic board is one of those "first-gen problems" that will be resolved in future versions. I can't understand how Apple can market this machine to hard core pros like it's something along the lines of a portable Mac Pro, but keep people from being able to do even the most basic of upgrades on it.

Sure, 16 GB sounds like a lot now, but for pros on the bleeding edge, they're likely to require 32 GB within the next two years -- before the extended AppleCare on this thing expires.

It's a shame that with this product, Apple seems to be pigeon holing the primary target buyer of this machine into buying a whole new laptop and paying another hefty premium anytime they need more speed/power (which they inevitably will.) Sounds like the iPad/iPhone business model to me and that's disappointing with a $2,100+ laptop.
 
Proof that they changed the SSD connector? Here:

https://www.macrumors.com/2012/06/12/teardown-of-mid-2012-macbook-air-reveals-tweaked-ssd-connector/

But proof that they did it to screw people over? That, it's not. The new connection works at a faster speed. Who are we to say that a faster connection didn't require a physical redesign?

SATA II to SATA III? The 2010 and 2011 Airs have the same connector even though one is only 3Gbps and the other is 6Gbps. I'm hoping there is another reason other than speed for the change.
 
Good post

It's good to know the SSD is not compatible with 3rd party devices. It's worthy to note that I did not see an upgrade option for the slower Retina display Mac Book Pro, so if you want larger than 256GB internal harddrive you'll need to go to the top end model. I don't know why Apple has left off the upgrade option for the lower end model.
 
If people want a LEGO computer, they'd buy a box. If people want slim, nice, eyc, they'd buy a Mac. This news really shouldn't affect Mac-buyers.

Complaining about not being able to get into this MBP is silly.

Just don't buy it. It's not the machine for you!
Stick with the other MBP's which in time will have retina too.

When my kids used to whine about stuff I would always say:

Okay, if you whine everything is off or you won't get this!

Wish that worked here:)
 
Apple has even taken to gluing the large battery into the body of the Retina MacBook Pro, with iFixit ultimately giving up on trying to remove it for fear of puncturing a battery cell. The glued-in battery pack also covers the trackpad cable, making it nearly inaccessible and susceptible to damage if users attempt to remove the battery.
This is simply inexcusable. Batteries are arguably the most likely point of failure in mobile devices.
 
You can either have something small, or something proprietary. Not both.

Apple chose that to build custom parts so that they used as little space as possible, and were the shape and size to fit inside their laptops. Using proprietary parts, you have to use the size and shape that the third party manufacturers make. You're stuck with someone else telling you how small you can make a laptop. Apple now controls their own designs.

I'd rather have a design which is smaller, lighter, has more battery power that I USE EVERY DAY, instead of make it heavier, bigger and have less batteries for the one day out of 5 years that makes repairing it easier.

I think you need to fix up the above sentence I made bold since it is a contradiction in terms - are yo acclaiming that you can have something small and open standards then? conversely are you saying that proprietary equals smaller or bigger?

Let me do the work for you that you should have done originally:

You can either have something small and proprietary or something that is larger but industry standard but not both.

Please proof-read next time before correcting someone.
 
Last edited:
It's not so much space saving as it is consumer screwing. There are plenty of more standard interfaces like pcie or msata that could easily fit into similar space. But they want to make sure nobody but them takes your money. Greedy Apple tactics are nothing new.

As for RAM, this is pure bs. There are plenty of smaller thinner machines out there that have user-upgradable RAM. Many Air imitators for example. They want you to pay a major premium upfront for their memory and then throw away the machine once the RAM amount in it becomes insufficient for newer software. Just Apple being its greedy self again.

I like the fact that I can replace certain things with parts of my own choosing so I won't be buying this machine for sure. That and the fact that I refuse to pay over $2K for a laptop.

Then in that case the non-Retina Macbook Pro is perfect for you. Buy that instead.

P.S. I checked your other posts. It seems you are very proud of the Desktop PC you built on your own and love your ThinkPad. Based on that, it seems you just wanted to add your two cents in here without being a Mac user yourself. Just making an observation...
 
The SSD is upgradable... OWC offers their own SSD modules, and they are working on new ones for the Retina MBPs.

That's good... what about the RAM, though?

Regarding the battery:
How long is it designed to last? For nice round numbers, lets just say I go through 250 charge cycles a year. For how many years will I get 6 hours out of my laptop per charge cycle?

Lets say 3-5 years down the road, I need to replace the battery. How will I be able to do that? Will Apple do it for me? Will AppleCare cover it, or will that be too far out? How much will it probably cost?
 
And if a brick falls on you while you're not wearing a helmet, you'll die.

Some risks are worth taking and not thinking about.

If you don't want to, Apple still sells the thick non-Retina MBP. Enjoy.

That's a silly example. What if you lived in a world where one day, for sure, inevitably, a brick would fall on your head? Would you consider wearing a helmet then?

Batteries die. It's what they do. One day the battery will be worn out and need replacing. That's a guaranteed fact.

I'm glad to hear that Apple's replacement battery includes the replacement itself, but I wonder how they plan to do it if the batteries are glued on so tightly that even iFixit is afraid to touch it.
 
I already ordered the new retina MacBook Pro. I'm planning to use it for at least 3 years. I'm happy I ordered it with 16 Gb because then I probably won't ever need to upgrade the RAM. I'm a bit worried that a 512 Gb SSD won't be enough in the future. On the other hand it seems that Thunderbolt / USB3 will make it easy to use extremely fast external storage.

I recently did a similar upgrade from an older MacBook Pro (first gen MBPro, actually) to an early 2011 unibody MBPro. I put a 256 GB SSD in it, which is easily the best decision I ever made. I also max'ed out the RAM at 8GB.

The only problem I ran into is space. I have an 18MP DSLR with 1080p video capabilities. Suffice to say I store the videos on an external drive– but that would be the case even if I had a 1TB internal HD. As for pictures, I keep about 50 GB of pics on the internal at any given time, and offload the older ones to the external.

I think you'll be in great shape with a 512Gb SSD. I'm not sure the 768GB SSD is worth the upgrade price, given the underlying issues. If you need to store a lot of pics or big files internally, 512GB will be plenty, 256GB means you have to be choosy, and 128GB would have been way too small– apple was right to not include it.

The operating system and a decent suite of programs is going to eat about 100GB.

Good luck with the new Mac. My father is going to get one, but with the 256GB since he doesn't need to store large photos or video. It looks amazing!
 
I think you need to fix up the above sentence I made bold since it is a contradiction in terms - are yo acclaiming that you can have something small and open standards then? conversely are you saying that proprietary equals smaller or bigger?

Let me do the work for you that you should have done originally:



Please proof read next time before correcting someone.

Proofread is one word, not two. So the same thing applies to you.
 
Honestly, the only reason I can't justify upgrading my MBP to this is because earlier this year I invested in a 512GB Samsung 830 SSD.

I'm finding some hope however, that judging from the teardown, there's not quite enough space for an SSD where the flash memory is located. However on a slightly larger model you'd have that extra breathing room required to fit in a standard SSD. Perhaps the 17" model can make a return with a replaceable SSD when Apple inevitably decides to cease production of the non-retina models?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.