Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
68,106
38,857


Developers who want to develop browsers for iOS with third-party engines can only test their apps on devices physically located in the EU, according to The Register.

webkit-vs-chromium-feature.jpg

This rule introduces a considerable barrier for developers outside the EU, who are now limited to using simulators instead of actual devices for testing their browsers. This restriction complicates the process of developing and supporting browsers with alternative engines, as on-device testing is essential to accurate performance assessment and troubleshooting. Apple's previous policy, which remains in place in other regions around the world, demands the use of WebKit for all iOS and iPadOS browsers, effectively making every browser on these platforms a variant of Safari.

Under the Digital Markets Act (DMA), Apple was designated as a gatekeeper in the European Union, compelling the company to make changes to its policies. With the release of iOS 17.4, Apple began allowing the use of alternative browser engines within the EU. However, it has now emerged that testing of browsers with third-party engines is strictly geofenced to the EU, potentially hindering the ability of developers around the world to address security issues or implement updates efficiently.

The requirements raise some practical concerns about the feasibility of supporting a separate EU browser. Some developers have pointed out that Apple's extensive list of conditions makes it challenging to comply while also ensuring that the browser remains competitive and secure.

The European Commission has launched an investigation into Apple's compliance with the DMA, focusing on the restrictive nature of its latest changes. The investigation seeks to determine whether Apple's requirements are designed to circumvent the spirit of the DMA by making it difficult for competitors to operate on a level playing field.

Article Link: Testing of iOS Browsers With Third-Party Engines Geofenced to EU
 
I've been a fierce defender of the way Apple has done business. There's a reason iOS has been a secure (mostly) and malware-free platform.

But man. The petty decisions there's making around the EU regulations sort of have soured me on that idea. Hard to defend these juvenile actions.
 
Apple should be doing everything they can* to help web developers treat Safari as something other than an afterthought. Instead they pull this crap.

*Including providing Safari for Windows again so Windows-only devs can test on Safari and debug on iOS Safari. Larger organizations will do what it takes to test on Macs, but the sooner a bug is caught, the cheaper it is to fix. The cheaper it is to fix a bug, the more likely it is that it will get fixed. A dev with access to Safari can catch bugs sooner than a separate testing organization can.
 
Last edited:
I mean, this is literally what the EU has asked for. “Give us special treatment” Ok, you’ve got the specialest treatment of all :)
Indeed, I'll cry zero tears for any issues the EU has with this DMA nonsense. The more friction the better as far as I'm concerned. The whole thing is ridiculous. I don't care what company you are the EU is so full of it and trying to dictate everything. I hope they get what they "wanted".
 
I've been a fierce defender of the way Apple has done business. There's a reason iOS has been a secure (mostly) and malware-free platform.

But man. The petty decisions there's making around the EU regulations sort of have soured me on that idea. Hard to defend these juvenile actions.

I think it's great. Apple does the same thing I do with taxes, reluctantly comply.
 
The EU will never, ever have the right to claim that it is a "gatekeeper" of free markets. It is a gatekeeper for its own interests and those of the lobby groups who have spent millions and millions to convince the EU Commission to bring down Apple and Google. Mainly for the benefit of the likes of other big companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Spotify etc. The EU is as protectionist as China, but in more diffuse ways. That said, the US is also protectionist in its own ways, as evidenced by the Biden billions pouring into infrastructure and on-shoring of manufacturing. The only country not to cotton on to this is the UK, which sells any assets to anyone who wants them. Even the Royal Mail is about to be sold off to foreign interests.
 
Looks like the feasibility of me using iPad or Vision Pro for my work computer is also geofenced to the EU.
 
  • Like
Reactions: robvalentine
Of course there are people here who claim that Apple has every right to limit absolutely everything to the EU space. And they do. But it's cosmically stupid. It's stupid in practice and execution.

Apple is doing the equivalent of saying "you have the right to use the bathroom" but then not putting one in your office. You have one at home. Go use that.

I defend Apple's decision - but it makes them look like absolute jerks, because no one can possibly argue that the technical workforce isn't always centralized. (edit: to be specific, it shouldn't be Apple's right to dictate how companies are organized and structured as a sort of retaliatory action)

Apple can and should be a lot nicer here, if they cared about developers.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.