My history of watching the World Cup only extends back to 1994, but I think this is (so far) easily the best I've ever watched out of those.
My history of watching the World Cup only extends back to 1994, but I think this is (so far) easily the best I've ever watched out of those.
I can remember watching TV highlights in 1954 West Germany won.![]()
I would love to have watched football in the 50s, to see the way the game has changed. I just finished reading Jonathan Wilson's Inverting the Pyramid and that's the closest I'll get to it.
I would love to have watched football in the 50s, to see the way the game has changed. I just finished reading Jonathan Wilson's Inverting the Pyramid and that's the closest I'll get to it.
Ahh the joys of trying to control a wet leather football in -1C on a muddy pitch. The almost guaranteed concussion from heading the ball, with a plus if you caught the laces in the ball, your forehead was badly cut up.
Baggie shorts to your knees, and boots till over your ankles, and woollen shirts, just great in the rain.![]()
Still not sure about Chile. It seems they need a lot of chances, while Brazil doesn't as much. Against NED, Chile was weakening in the defense and of the chances they didn't get one in. Then, they mastered an Italian defense (missed that match, because I had to drive my mother shopping). Brazil looked kind of "unorganised", not quite the right word.Can't wait for Brazil vs. Chile - I'm rooting for Chile all the way. I hope they at least scare the hell out of Brazil.
USA - (...)
Not to mention the lack of defending in the modern sense. Things were different in those days!
On the US, it seems the public is getting really interested in football (like SanctoGuy had also shown so nicely), but I wonder, if that will carry on after the WC. (Edit: Klinsmann just said in an interview, he thinks this time it is Germany winning the cup... hm... not sure).
Not sure, if I translate that right... flipping posts as in "idiot posts"?(...)
Flipping posts...always such killjoys.
Not sure, if I translate that right... flipping posts as in "idiot posts"?
Edit: or was that re the washingtonPOST article?
Oops. My bad english came out there.
'Flipping' is basically British for 'freaking' or more explicitly 'f-word(ing)'
Should've said flipping goalposts or freaking goalposts instead, to be clearer.
.Tomorrow in Brazil:*
*stolen from twitter
Let's go Mexico!
Yes, please go. I even rather see Robben weeping for joy again than see Mexico in the quarterfinals.
and so they won't the netherland's.(...) But the football gods will never let Brazil go out that early.