Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
View attachment 1807539

Welcome back to the PREM!

First time since '46/'47 season!
Very good. Two questions come to mind. How much more do the local fans have to pay for a ticket for this season? If the club now shares in some bigger television pool and other related benefits perhaps the ticket prices should decrease.
Looking at history, what percentage of clubs who get promoted to the top tier drop down again after one season?
 
  • Like
Reactions: pachyderm
Very good. Two questions come to mind. How much more do the local fans have to pay for a ticket for this season? If the club now shares in some bigger television pool and other related benefits perhaps the ticket prices should decrease.
Looking at history, what percentage of clubs who get promoted to the top tier drop down again after one season?
Quite a lot. At least one of the three who come up have always gone down as far as I remember. But you’ve got to aim for something haven’t you?
 
Quite a lot. At least one of the three who come up have always gone down as far as I remember. But you’ve got to aim for something haven’t you?
Of course you do. If I recall one of the more recent teams to do so was Hull. When I worked in London I attended a couple of Charlton games due to family connections and my assistant at work was a long time Brentford fan. She is probably wetting herself.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: pachyderm
Columbus 2-1 NYC FC

Columbus do a double over New York City FC this season thanks, once again, to Lucas Zelarayán's dead ball heroics (and, to be honest, some rather generous goalkeeping by NYC).

Columbus, with many starters missing on international duty, looked sloppy all match and were unable to possess the football for any length of time. All of our attacks were counterattacks. We had no success holding the ball up, with neither Miguel Berry nor Erik Hurtado achieving the same level of effectiveness as our usual starter Gyasi Zardes. Luckily, NYC were arguably just as sloppy. New York got behind Columbus' defense way too often, with our fullbacks constantly being bamboozled by the same runs from NYC's wide players. But NY's final ball was usually a hopeful punt into the mixer. Columbus ate up NY's corner attempts all day, but needed several really strong saves from Eloy Room to avoid conceding some dumb goals. Both Columbus goals were individual efforts from Darlington Nagbe and Lucas Zelarayán (his free kick was far too central but the keeper was shading the wrong side and leaped way too late).

We just need to get out of this international window and get our players back, hopefully uninjured. Still well in the playoff hunt and there's a long way to go.

Also happy to report that I didn't see a single fan in the stands wearing our hideous new crest. I'm not spending a dime on merch till they change it.
 
Last edited:
I'm just watching USA vs Canada in the gold Cup.

I have to say, there's a lot of really sloppy football being played. This is the first time I have seen any footage of this tournament, but if this is the best that CONCACAF have to offer, then it's going to be a grim World Cup next year for the North American teams...
 
  • Like
Reactions: pachyderm
I'm just watching USA vs Canada in the gold Cup.

I have to say, there's a lot of really sloppy football being played. This is the first time I have seen any footage of this tournament, but if this is the best that CONCACAF have to offer, then it's going to be a grim World Cup next year for the North American teams...
USA and Mexico should be in CONMEBOL. It would be better for everyone involved...USA and Mexico play in a more competitive federation, and the smaller CONCACAF teams actually have a shot at qualifying for a World Cup.

I'd love USA to be playing in the Copa America...that would be a million times more fun than the Gold Cup.
 
Last edited:
USA and Mexico should be in CONMEBOL. It would be better for everyone involved...USA and Mexico play in a more competitive federation, and the smaller CONCACAF teams actually have a shot at qualifying for a World Cup.

I'd love USA to be playing in the Copa America...that would be a million times more fun than the Gold Cup.
I feel the same way about NZ in Oceania - they should combine Oceania and Asia so that there's better and more meaningful competition. Paying against Tonga, Samoa, Fiji, New Caledonia and Tahiti doesn't help anyone.

Playing WC qualifiers against those teams then having a playoff against CONMEBOL 5th place team is not an easy route through...Australia did the right thing moving to Asia.

Was the USA v Canada match a true indication of the quality of play in the Gold Cup? It wasn't even A-League or MLS quality, from what I saw...
 
  • Like
Reactions: brucemr
Was the USA v Canada match a true indication of the quality of play in the Gold Cup? It wasn't even A-League or MLS quality, from what I saw...
Yes and no. This time around, USA brought essentially an MLS-based team to compete and mixed in a lot of youth talent. So it's not an A-squad, and Berhalter is treating the tournament almost like a series of early WC qualifiers. Which probably sounds odd to Europeans. It would be like playing an England squad you'd normally see facing, say, Moldova in a world cup qualifier, but instead using that squad to contest the Euros.

But it's an off-cycle year and the Gold Cup is played biannually, so this is not unusual. It's a chance to test squad depth. It's still a good enough squad to have a reasonably good shot at winning, though Mexico are perennial favorites.
 
Yes and no. <snip> It's a chance to test squad depth. It's still a good enough squad to have a reasonably good shot at winning, though Mexico are perennial favorites.
Ah...that makes sense. And I naturally would have thought that Mexico would be favourites, based on what I have seen of them in the past...but then before this match I would have thought the same about USA!
 
And so the Olympics have kicked off!
Shock win for the Swedes in the women's competition last night. To be beaten is something that can happen. To be beaten 3-0 is something the USA women will not be accustomed to.
That will take some getting used to for them - but I am worried for the NZ team who are also in this group. Their easiest game was played overnight (NZT) and they were outclassed. The scoreline flattered them (2-1 to AUS)
My son played against the NZ women's team in a warm up game and to be fair, I didn't think they'd be likely contenders for the knockout rounds. His U17 team won convincingly against a full-strength NZ squad.

Who can beat Sweden in this group? AUS? NZ? I think they're a dead cert for the win in both of those - it's just a matter of who comes second in that group.

These results also beg the question...who is now the favourite for the tournament? I would have said USA - now I might be so bold as to predict Team GB.

Thoughts?
 
Last edited:
Too early to tell. This loss could be just what the USWNT needed to wake them up and set their focus. They are still the best in the world IMO, and could go on a run now. But a hugely impressive win for Sweden, and they have to be seen as early favorites now. But there is a lot of football yet to play. I do fear for NZ, because USA will want to get right back in the groove and the best way to do that is to lay down a marker by smashing their next opponent.

I feel like it's a pretty open competition, though I admit I don't know the teams very well.

Looking forward to the men's football too (and the cycling, but that's for another thread).
 
Team USA was never going to dominate the women's game forever. Other countries have improved a lot over the past few years, and it's good for the overall health of the game.
 
Team USA was never going to dominate the women's game forever. Other countries have improved a lot over the past few years, and it's good for the overall health of the game.
Yes, we'll likely never enjoy that level of dominance again. But the USWNT now has something the men's team does not - a culture of winning and a deep pool of players playing the very highest level. USWNT was the pioneer and will likely always be among the best. Something to be proud of.

Europe had the infrastructure and talent pool to catch up quickly once they pulled their finger out and actually started giving a damn about the women's game (after actively suppressing it for decades). Now that they have some good professional leagues they will start dominating the international scene as they do in the men's game.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: pachyderm
Rapinoe's a lot of things, but I wouldn't call her pompous. Her words after the match were measured and gave full credit to Sweden's performance.

She's won everything there is to win in her sport, and has nothing to prove. But she doesn't display the level of self-absorption you see from, say, Zlatan or Cristiano.
 
And the NZ Olywhites have their first ever win in an Olympics with a 1- 0 win over Sth Korea (incidentally, the Asia Confederation champions).

Some serious scorelines in other matches, too. Didn't see the France score coming!

This is going to be a good Olympics football tournament, I think. Also looking forward to the Track and Field kicking off, too (but as has been said, that's another thread).
 
My team finally completed the deal for Jadon Sancho, hopefully the large amount they spent will be rewarded with his play. Welcome Jadon!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Silencio
1627126872068.png



Home & away... Not bad.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.