Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Just like another well known top team who played very very badly and yet were 'milking it'.

I assume that you refer to Manchester United, not Arsenal.

Arsenal are a young team - and, while I gnaw my nails with stress and want to tear my hair out with frustration at times - in truth, given that they have led from the front since the beginning of the season, they have actually done extremely well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sal09
why oh why we didn't play like this against Hammers and Saints 😞.

I was about to put away my box of lindt chocies but after that thought i need one or more chocs to cheer me up.
My thoughts, too.

I think that the occasion may have got to them, which is not to take away from the performance (excellent in both cases) of West Ham and Southampton.

Enjoy your chocolates.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sal09
3-1.

One step closer to the relegation zone.

I say Chelsea will finish between 15th-17th, though. Bournemouth and Wolves just have to win one, and West Ham two, and we're almost there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sal09
Don't understand how Chelsea can spend half a billion and be arguably a worse side than Bournemouth.

A lot of teams have work to do next season and beyond.
 
Don't understand how Chelsea can spend half a billion and be arguably a worse side than Bournemouth.

A lot of teams have work to do next season and beyond.

Because money is not the answer in the absence of a vision for the team, allied to the ability and ambition (which Lampard lacks) to craft a team from a collection of expensive (and highly-paid) individuals.

Bournemouth, Brighton, Palace, Villa, Liverpool (and, dare I say it, Arsenal) - among others - have all played as a team (the old "one for all and all for one") this season, and have been coached to play together as a team and to have a collective vision.

Chelsea are a collection of (extortionately expensive) individuals who have yet to create or craft a common identity as a team.
 
Screenshot 2023-05-02 at 21.57.42.jpeg
 
Because money is not the answer in the absence of a vision for the team, allied to the ability and ambition (which Lampard lacks) to craft a team from a collection of expensive (and highly-paid) individuals.

Bournemouth, Brighton, Palace, Villa, Liverpool (and, dare I say it, Arsenal) - among others - have all played as a team (the old "one for all and all for one") this season, and have been coached to play together as a team and to have a collective vision.

Chelsea are a collection of (extortionately expensive) individuals who have yet to create or craft a common identity as a team.

Poch has work to do and i hope for his sake Boehly gives him time

Just seen that City have 10 games to play and Arsenal have 4 albeit tougher ones.

Still think it's City's title but you never know. Think the result at St. James's Park will be a good indicator.
 
Last edited:
Fun Fact courtesy Twitter:

Chelsea have used 3 different managers to move from 38 to 39 points 😮.
Read Barney Ronay's scathing (and brilliant) piece tonight in the Guardian ("Collapse at Arsenal sums up Chelsea’s deathly, pointless celebrity product"), where he writes:

"Chelsea have spent more than any other club in Europe, .....
But it isn’t just this. It is instead the way Chelsea are bad. What is this thing, parading across the stage in the weeds of Chelsea FC, eyes blazing with dead energy, a skinny hand clamped on your wrist, leaning in to tell its tale of stolen youth and wasted days, idle as a painted ship on a painted ocean?

Here the blue shirts moved and even at times seemed to share some vague muscle memory of being a team. But mainly Chelsea had a basic creepiness about them, sport without play or joy or energy, sport as something unheimlich, eerie, undead...

Freud said that the basis of all horror stories is an uncertainty as to whether an entity is dead or alive. And fair play to the boy Sigmund, he pretty much called it."

And - @Apple fanboy should enjoy this exquisite sentence: " This Chelsea iteration is what football would have looked like in the invite-only Super League, not so much a team as a deathly and pointless celebrity product. Let’s have an all-star game. Let’s hoard all the money to buy all the players. Let’s flex our fangs and wring every last drop of revenue out of this thing right now. Let’s kill and move on..."

Later, in the same piece - Ronay is in flying form tonight, this is superb, scathing sports writing:

" Chelsea’s starting XI was at least interesting and disruptive and weird, which seem to be the qualities the ownership admires most. Here is a Kremlin-era stalwart, here a supermarket-sweep oddity, some casino-chip players, some buy‑one‑get‑one‑frees.....

And through all this the story behind the story was the extraordinary spectacle of Chelsea FC, a footballing death in life. What have you done Todd Boehly (and associates)? How have you drained this thing so mercilessly? This is sport as greed-ridden incoherence, as a game of celebrity stocks and shares. It’s a bad plan enacted badly by people who are bad at enacting plans. It is, at its full extension, the death of all this: anti-sport, un-football."

This week, the football writers in the Guardian have been on fire, with some fine - acerbic, articulate, insightful intelligent and informed - writing.

Superb.
 
Congratulations and the best of luck in the Championship next season.

I agree with @laptech: Should you push for further promotion next season (well, ambition is always considered laudable)?

Or, might it not be better to consolidate your position in the Championship - re resources, players, finances, investment - and then, after a further year or so, try to push for further promotion?

It is not just a question of whether you are able to do so, but whether it is wise to want to do so.
I think we will be aiming for a mid table - top 10 finish. Obviously survival is the first priority, but our ownership are ambitious and relentless in taking the club forward.

I'm hoping for a mid table finish to consolidate our Championship status, and then we can look to push on further after that. We already know we can compete with some of the teams in the league, having beaten Rotherham comfortably in the FA Cup and took Burnley to a replay and they only beat us in the last minute. So that will give the team a lot of confidence knowing they should be able to compete at the higher level.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scepticalscribe
Hoping West Ham can do the impossible tonight.
I’m thinking there will be a lot of extra support in the red half of North London and the red half of Manchester.
Come on you Irons!
Well, for my part, I shall be passionately urging West Ham to an improbable, unlikely, but devoutly welcome victory this evening.
 
Sam Allardyce has been confirmed as Leeds manager for the remaining four games of the season, - their third manager of the season - and, according to the Guardian - has been offered what they refer to as an "incentivised" package, reportedly around £3million if he steers them to safety, avoiding relegation.

Words almost fail me.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.