Still waiting for the denoument on Henderson, but the current silence from the player and club speaks volumes...it's not a move he can conduct gracefully and in the open.
Liverpool are still looking for midfielders in spite of the arrival of Mac Allister and Szoboszlai, as Thiago may also depart. It feels like a near-total rebuild in the middle. Checik Doucoure and Romeo Lavia remain in the mix among the rumors.
The consensus is also that van Dijk does not have a partner who is both consistently good and consistently healthy enough, so a center back signing is possible. I hope Konate can step it up this season, but maybe what we see now is what we're going to get.
Midfield has historically been a weak spot under Klopp - not 'bad' but there has always been room for improvement. Last season saw a lot of shaky defensive performances, but perhaps a stronger midfield, rather than big changes at the back, will address that.
As a German, I should probably hold back a bit when it comes to evaluating football players. However, I cannot leave this sentence entirely uncommented on if I want to sleep peacefully tonight, and so I comment on it as follows:
If you want footballers to devote themselves primarily to the sport and not to marketing, you should campaign vigorously for those who pay footballers their salaries to stop spending obscene amounts of money on them. There is no reason, even remotely considered reasonable, to pay a guy who kicks a ball around a few times a year on a full-time basis a hundred times more than a gardener. Gardeners are at least useful and not merely entertaining.
I couldn't agree more. Though when you consider the situation several relevant points emerge. First, regarding player attitudes; I have often stated that
primarily blaming the players is contributing to the problem rather than addressing it. Players are highly public figures playing an elite sport and I have no problem with them earning large salaries. The point of departure from 'large' into 'stratospheric' is the responsibility pretty much everyone else in the game
before the players. They are merely the most publicly exposed individuals and focus on them effectively shields the real malefactors (owners, club suits, agents, corporate interests, weak/corrupt governing officials).
Second, as to the
reasonableness of the amount of money in the game, there is a very clear argument in favor of what is happening if you are looking at it from one of several points of view - namely, profit (agents, corporate sponsors), money laundering or tax evasion (asset-stripping owners/club suits), and sportswashing (we know who
they are). Football is big business and politically valuable. Is that all morally damnable? Certainly. But it is also 'reasonable' within the confines of those selfish and / or nefarious purposes. Until we can make football unattractive for these purposes, especially the latter two, the money will continue to flow in torrents.
And anyway it's primarily
our money they are flinging around, in the form of revenue from commodities, services, and TV subscriptions. Everything from oil to snack foods to banking to gambling.