Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
People are confused because everyone is saying wrist circumference WHICH DOES NOT MATTER! It's wrist width! You can have 50mm width and 170mm circumference and 42mm will be dumb looking. But you can have 65mm width and 170mm circumference and it'll look fine.

Just so much useless info. Also, you can not possible make comparisons to yourself based on pics without measurements. It's too hard to tell. These are very subtle differences where 2mm makes a big difference.

All the more reason for people to just go try on the watch.
 
People are confused because everyone is saying wrist circumference WHICH DOES NOT MATTER! It's wrist width! You can have 50mm width and 170mm circumference and 42mm will be dumb looking. But you can have 65mm width and 170mm circumference and it'll look fine.

Just so much useless info. Also, you can not possible make comparisons to yourself based on pics without measurements. It's too hard to tell. These are very subtle differences where 2mm makes a big difference.

All the more reason for people to just go try on the watch.

That would be fine if Apple would quit the 'limited stock' game. Odds are if we don't pre-order tonight, there will be delays.

Yeah, yeah, I know...first world problems.
 
I am a pretty big guy, like muscular big 6'0 around 198lbs during summer at LOW body fat level like 8-9%. But i oddly have smaller wrists and ankles, never bothered to check. My forearms are massive compared to my wrist, i know its weird my forearms just get bigger but wrists stay the same lol. I like bigger watches so i was for sure going with the 42mm. Hell i wish they had some 45mm ones:cool:. After reading tonight i was fearing that many said even the 42mm looked small. I don't want to have something "dinky" looking so to speak.

I collect Invicta diving watches and i have some in my collection that are 50mm plus!

Wrist and ankle size is genetic in nature and doesn't really change based on how stro you get. Wrist circumfrence is a good indicator of your genetic potential for strength.
 
People are confused because everyone is saying wrist circumference WHICH DOES NOT MATTER! It's wrist width! You can have 50mm width and 170mm circumference and 42mm will be dumb looking. But you can have 65mm width and 170mm circumference and it'll look fine.

Just so much useless info. Also, you can not possible make comparisons to yourself based on pics without measurements. It's too hard to tell. These are very subtle differences where 2mm makes a big difference.

All the more reason for people to just go try on the watch.

Your wrist size isn't useless information when picking a watch face. It helps when determining face size, band width/length, and the look of the watch from angles other than just straight on
 
Following the Instagram feed. For some reason, people with the tiniest wrists in the world are trying on 42mm watches. Huh.
 
I have what I have always believed to be skinny wrists (one reason I wear a watch in the first place is to try and hide that fact)...but I wear a pebble and since the 42mm is a fraction smaller, it's definitely a 42mm for me
 
Last edited:
OP obviously thinks the 42mm is too big (especially since he seems to think even the 38mm is too big) and so too prove it he searches instagram for pictures of the 42mm on tiny wrists to "prove" his point... :roll eyes:

Thanks for your insight..
 
One way to check is to cut out one of the 1:1 PDFs found online. Print it out and tape to a piece of foam core, leaving some paper strips for bands.

Also, the 42mm is not huge. I compared it to my Seiko chronograph and its narrower, shorter (taking the Seiko's band mount into consideration) and thinner (10.5 mm v 12.17 mm).
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    1.6 MB · Views: 102
do you have a pic?

Sorry, the Apple Store guy didn't let me take one. My wrist width is about 50mm, so it fit almost perfectly, with little space at the top and the bottom (barely visible due to the thickness of the watch.)
 
Sorry, the Apple Store guy didn't let me take one. My wrist width is about 50mm, so it fit almost perfectly, with little space at the top and the bottom (barely visible due to the thickness of the watch.)

thanks anyway..

It is kind of curious that they didn't allow a photo. Instagram is beaming right now with photos of people trying them on.

yeah my tweetdeck list for #applewatch is exploding mostly with Chinese?
 
It is kind of curious that they didn't allow a photo. Instagram is beaming right now with photos of people trying them on.

Seen Australia pictures and then China photos. I may have seen one photo where the caption was in Japanese. Japanese Apple Stores may just be more restrictive. I lived there for a while. Very restrictive culture. :)
 
Seen Australia pictures and then China photos. I may have seen one photo where the caption was in Japanese. Japanese Apple Stores may just be more restrictive. I lived there for a while. Very restrictive culture. :)

Yeah, those Japanese sure are restrictive...
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1754.jpg
    IMG_1754.jpg
    155.4 KB · Views: 170
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.