Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
That's the problem I ran into with the iPod touch. When I read that it would only come in 8gb and 16gb capacity I kind of let out a sigh. I have a hard time fitting my stuff on my 30gb ipod as it is. I have to constantly think, "Would I listen to this that much if I put it on there?" just because I have to conserve space.

I can't quite understand how you could struggle with 30gb of space. That's dozens of days worth of non stop music, 24/7, isn't it?

Half of the success story behind the Apple iPod is its seamless syncing with iTunes, but I get the impression that a lot of people here don't really use it much anyway. Which means we should all go out and buy something else ;)

But seriously, I'm also a bit disappointed with the 8/16gb options in the iPod Touch. Even my 4th gen iPod Photo has 60Gb (of which I'm only able to fill a third with music, and the rest with data).
 
My favorite leading up to the event was one guy who kept insisting in the forum that it wouldn't be an ipod event, that it was to announce the next version of Logic Pro!

He even kept asking for the "official press release" saying that the event was about iPods.

:rolleyes:
 
Whoever 9to5 Mac has on the inside - be it one guy or a few people - will not be on the inside for much longer, guaranteed. Give it a month and that place will be the new Think Secret - they'll do an entry on the mid-range tower with elevator photos and everything.
 
9to5 were spot on with photos, but thin on information about specs. Up until the event there was a lot of conflicting predictions. Not surprisingly some of them were correct.
 
9to5 Mac - brought to you by Apple

Apple has a pretty impressive record of keeping new products/ announcements under raps.

I find it hard to believe that Apple have suddenly become clumsy and loose-lipped - well not by accident anyway.

I believe it's much more likely that the latest spate of super accurate rumours is simply a tactic by Apple PR to generate pre-announcement buzz. And like most things from Cupertino - it sure works.

Remember, a certain repressed blogger said this at MWSF 2006... "Hi, I'm Steve Jobs, and welcome to my weekly podcast, Super Secret Apple Rumors, featuring all the latest news from our favorite company." Looks like Steve's got his dream gig at 9to5 Mac.
 
As a new Mac-adaptee this latest round of refreshes and prices has only made me more happy with my choice to switch. Especially with the good showing by Jobs giving the early adapters the 100 dollars back on their iPhones. It shows that the company actually values its customers. Good round, over all.

(Now if my only my MBP + nano would ship! :rolleyes: )

- Kira
 
I can't quite understand how you could struggle with 30gb of space. That's dozens of days worth of non stop music, 24/7, isn't it?


right, but that doesn't hold a lot of VIDEO, since one of the major points for having a full sized screen is a bigger picture.
 
My favorite leading up to the event was one guy who kept insisting in the forum that it wouldn't be an ipod event, that it was to announce the next version of Logic Pro!

He even kept asking for the "official press release" saying that the event was about iPods.

:rolleyes:

Hahaha, that guy cracked me up too =)
 
IMO Apple is doing a good job keeping secrets if it's important.

Look at companies like Sony and Microsoft... psp, ps3 and xbox360 price drops were revealed before the actual price drops, some even posted ads from circuit city. Has the same ever happened to Apple? Even just for the new iPods?

Hi,

I remember the G4 iMac being on Time's front cover on the online edition the night before its release.

s.
 
aww....

i've been waiting for the ipod touch for more than a year now- but I noticed something on the 360 gallery thingy.



the headphone jack is on the bottom :mad: :eek: :mad: :eek: :mad:



i hate the nanos that were like that. AAAARRRRRRGGGGHHHH
 
What is up with the AppleTV?

What is up with the AppleTV? Will it suffer the same fate is the iPod HI-FI within a year? I have seen any commerials for it awhile (not since the iPhone release). I was hoping for some news on the Apple TV front this Wednesday like software update and movie rentail service. I just spent $10.58 at Blockbuster to rent two Blu-Ray movies. I whether spend $11 to read three HD movies from iTunes.
 
9to5mac surprised everyone, including me. I would say their sources are by far the most accurate, at least this last round anyway. I mean really, a PSD file screenshot? That's from someone well commected in the chain of all things Apple.

I couldn't believe that screenshot was genuine either!!
Madness. Just goes to show, you never really can tell
 
I just got back from the Aple store. The new Nano Video is absolutely amazing!!!!

It's so light, smooth, nice size screen - a real winner.

I will tell you this right now - it will be the hottest item this holiday season. Everyone will be getting the 8gig Nano. The itunes video store sales will be through the roof.

NBC is going to kick themselves in the rear while Steve laughs his way to the bank.
 
Why no HDD?

I still don't really understand why the iPod touch wasn't hard drive based. With the iPhone, flash memory was a must because it's a damn phone. iPod is a different story though - we've been fine all these years with hard drive based media players, why can't we have one now in "the best iPod Apple has ever made"? I just think it's a tad soon to be switching the main-focus iPod to flash memory (which has been the whole point of the nano).

Maybe Steve just cares way to much about how thin the device is (anyone notice how many times he said "Just look at how thin this is! It's amazing" in the keynote?). Am I the only one that really doesn't care? My 5.5gen 30gb iPod is plenty thin and extremely portable. I really don't like sacrificing features for an extra 0.XXmm trimmed off the device.

I suspect it was more for battery life. Flash uses much less power. Just like the iPhone, the iPod Touch has that really large screen it has to power. So not only would the iPod touch have to be bigger for the HDD, it would have to be bigger for the battery. I think they made the right trade-off personally, but your opinion may vary.

What I think is interesting about the $200 price drop on the iPhone is that is the exact amount it costs to get out of my T-Mobile contract... It is a sign!

-PBUser167
 
Loose Lips Sink Ships....

I find it hard to believe that Apple have suddenly become clumsy and loose-lipped - well not by accident anyway.

Keep in mind that they have been on a hiring spree lately. Obviously hiring some folks that don't mind sharing secrets. Those photos from 9to5Mac look like someone was walking up to workstations at the Campus snapping pics of other peoples work. Apple security is probably all over it. It isn't as if Apple doesn't know who was doing the product artwork like the flower of new Nanos...

-PBUser167
 
Well, I for one am glad that the "iPhone without a phone" rumors were right. I have to admit that I was one of the most skeptical about them, though I was so hopeful for it. While the price drop removes half of the purchase barrier of the iPhone($400 is probably the most I'd consider reasonable for a phone), the other half(only AT&T as the carrier) was still there. The iPod touch looks great, except for the lack of a public API and an official way to develop applications. With the ability to make real apps with out a lot of trouble to for the end user to use them(mostly mail and IM), the iPod touch can replace my laptop for casual usage. I just hope they do release that SDK. It would allow Apple to succeed where Palm failed with the Zire to create the consumer PDA, or more accurately with the LifeDrive to create the multimedia PDA. It or the iPhone may never become corporate devices to replace the BlackBerry, but at long last the (broad, not techie)consumer market for PDAs and smart phones could finally be born. Though they will probably materialize with out a real SDK, it won't be quite the PC replacement it could be.
 
What is up with the AppleTV? Will it suffer the same fate is the iPod HI-FI within a year?

I hear everyone saying how the iPod Hi-Fi is dead ("ThinkSecret predicted the iPod Hi-Fi's demise. - Macrumors"). I really don't think so. Think about it. The webpage is STILL up there. It's been three days now and it's still up there. Sure, the Apple Store has it down, but that's usually the case when a product is getting revamped, not gone for good. If this was the case, there would no longer be a iPod Hi-Fi page at all. Also, the iPod Hi-Fi page has taken the "BUY" button down. If they did that, why not take the whole page down as opposed to making a minor change to it, but still leaving it up.

Mark my words, iPod Hi-Fi is getting revamped, not nixed.
 
I hear everyone saying how the iPod Hi-Fi is dead ("ThinkSecret predicted the iPod Hi-Fi's demise. - Macrumors"). I really don't think so. Think about it. The webpage is STILL up there. It's been three days now and it's still up there. Sure, the Apple Store has it down, but that's usually the case when a product is getting revamped, not gone for good. If this was the case, there would no longer be a iPod Hi-Fi page at all. Also, the iPod Hi-Fi page has taken the "BUY" button down. If they did that, why not take the whole page down as opposed to making a minor change to it, but still leaving it up.

Mark my words, iPod Hi-Fi is getting revamped, not nixed.

I don't think the iPod HiFi and the AppleTV are really comparable. The HiFi was more of an accessory that duplicated many competitors while the AppleTV is a real member of the main product line that a third party can't match completely. In any case, I hope the see the AppleTV continue to grow, while I see the iPod HiFi as integral part or Apple as the iPods socks.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.