Here here! Higher res on the 13's pllllllzzzzzzzzz. And matte. And it would be smart of them to do this as they could still keep the c2d's in them and get crazies like us to purchase out of date cpu's. But by god I would!
We're not as crazy as you might think. I really hope they speed bump the C2D rather than trying to cram in an i3/i5.
Pros for C2D:
Proven stability.
Lower operating temperatures.
Lower power consumption.
64-Bit, they still are a processor of the "future".
As fast as similar clocked i3's.
i5/i7's show meager gains in REAL WORLD tests. (
http://www.anandtech.com/show/3762/...ly-2010-reviewed-shaking-the-cpugpu-balance/3)
C2D layout is a single cpu die and single graphics/controller die, compare this to the maze of the i5/i7 architecture.
Cons for C2D:
It isn't the shiniest, newest thing out.
Doesn't score as high in unrealistic Cinebench/Geekbench testmarks.
Um...
I've been using a Powerbook G4 as my daily driver for going on the last 6 years. My point is, it's not about having the newest/greatest hardware out there, it's how you use it. I've been waiting ages to upgrade to intel, and frankly I'm disgusted by their monopolistic business attitude.
Here's what I want to see from Apple to finally jump the PPC ship:
13" MBP
C2D at 2.8gHz, BTO option for 3.06gHz
High Rez option.
Current battery is 63.5wHr, bump to 17"s 68wHr and we can get 10+ Hours!
Upgraded video card, maybe 512mb of VRam w/ 8gb installed?