For a swede like me I think we're in the same situation. I heard that Norway is getting the iphone soon so I guess that rest of scandinavia gets it too. No need for you to worryI hate to complain, but when is this thing hitting Denmark. Many posts include plans of lunches in various countries, but never this one... i guess it'll get here some day.
argghhhhh... just ordered 5 ****ing 16GB iPhones, and now 3G comes out in June!!!! that's just great...![]()
Apple should learn from when they first launched the iPhone at a ridiculous price. People just won't pay such a high price....especially when a lot of that cost if pure profit to the Apple.
Maybe they'll keep the EDGE-version in the US, doubt it though, but they will NEVER sell an EDGE-equipped iphone in europe if there's is a 3G iphone for sale. No way.Wirelessly posted (iPhone: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU like Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/420.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0 Mobile/4A102 Safari/419.3)
I think that the idea of keeping the Edge iPhone is pretty interesting. I think it will cause the 3G model to really have quite a price tag, but I guess that is what you pay for the latest and greatest.
i have to agree with you. The original price of $699 did not ring pretty in the ears.
i have to agree with you. The original price of $699 did not ring pretty in the ears. In fact, I think it scared me away even though I was not in a phone contract at the time.
A new phone should not be an opportunity to charge MUCH more, but rather to spur sales which have slowed.
And to make people like me very happy. 32gB and 3G. It's been a long wait.
450 is fair.
maybe because it was $599?
argghhhhh... just ordered 5 ****ing 16GB iPhones, and now 3G comes out in June!!!! that's just great...![]()
This thing's been rumoured for months...where've you been hiding?
But it's too late, already paid...
Don't despair - if you hunt around ebay, you'll find you may be able to sell them for $20 to $30 more than you paid for them. I say a $100 profit isn't bad.
Who is going to pay $420 for a used $400 iPhone?
Wrong again.There's been so much talk about the possibility of the "3G" iPhone, it can be hard to keep up with all the rumors. First of all, "3G" technology promises broadband-like speeds over wireless cellular networks. At present, the iPhone only offers 2.5G (EDGE) speeds, which means your web pages and email download at relatively slower speeds.
If it was just for Japan, a CDMA2000 would be possible.Japan doesn't have a GSM network. Combine that with Verizon's new "we're-the-most-open-network" and I might be getting a CDMA iPhone this Christmas...
I think the reason 3G doesn't seem super-faster than EDGE is latency. Loading a Web page involves a lot of requests, and there are latency issues. Once a file starts coming in you get it at a good clip, but the response time isn't better than EDGE.
So a Web page loads a bit faster than EDGE, but the real advantage comes in when you are getting a big file like an image or PDF, or streaming in stuff like a QuickTime or YouTube movie. There, we will see things move!
I don't think the new iPhone will look any different. Apple designs things right the first time and sticks with that for awhile. Since apple designs hardware configurations to fit perfectly into the design of a device, a redesign of the device would be incredibly costly.
corrado7 said:ummm just look at the ipod from the first generation till now... are they still the same??
I don't think the new iPhone will look any different. Apple designs things right the first time and sticks with that for awhile. Since apple designs hardware configurations to fit perfectly into the design of a device, a redesign of the device would be incredibly costly.
Because it is STILL available in FAR more places for basic access.
Please fix THAT first before you have a debate about bandwidth. Rural bandwidth matters too, perhaps more.
ummm just look at the ipod from the first generation till now... are they still the same??