boswald
macrumors 68040
I'd buy that for a dollar!Im waiting for them to revive this design.... give me this...and im a happy guy! View attachment 2649795
I always loved that style.
I'd buy that for a dollar!Im waiting for them to revive this design.... give me this...and im a happy guy! View attachment 2649795
Love it !! Question how do I upgrade my early 800 MHz iMac G4 to 1GB ram?. I have 768 now. I also am running Tiger 10.4.11 and wondering if that's the last OS I can run ? Thanks !When I was growing up in the PC world, I always hated all the cables connecting everything to the machine. In fact, I still do. The biggest appeal of the iMac to me was the clean design. To this day I wonder how my computer life would've changed if I had an iMac instead of a PC all those years ago.
Its a super petulant way to express it though, that's why he's getting backlash. Rightly so.No...? Seems like what he minds is someone designating themself Speaker. Kind of like exactly what he explained.
No. His annoyance is plenty justified.Its a super petulant way to express it though, that's why he's getting backlash. Rightly so.
No. His annoyance is plenty justified.
You mean like a Studio Display, a Mac Mini and 5 minutes neatly routing the 2 (Oh, the humanity!) extra cables?I was daydreaming in the shower this morning, about a design for a future iMac that is inspired by the much loved G4 design, and uses a Mac mini in the base for the compute module.
For the better, of course - it's a Mac - but that's not down to wires. On the downside, (depending on how log ago "all those years ago" was) you'd now have a collection of old iMacs with uselessly obsolete processors but perfectly usable screens that you can't use.To this day I wonder how my computer life would've changed if I had an iMac instead of a PC all those years ago.
How dare he make a point in a discussion! Even worse, he wasn't even rude or obnoxious!No it isn’t. If you are annoyed by a forum post, go touch grass, or better yet… get an iMac and chill out!
I'd say having a collection of Macs to tinker with and learn from would be a good thing. I never had the chance to try them growing up because of their price. But now that I'm older and I actually scored one, I can enjoy at least some of what I've missed out on. I'm also learning macOS pretty quickly (barring the Terminal).You mean like a Studio Display, a Mac Mini and 5 minutes neatly routing the 2 (Oh, the humanity!) extra cables?
For the better, of course - it's a Mac - but that's not down to wires. On the downside, (depending on how log ago "all those years ago" was) you'd now have a collection of old iMacs with uselessly obsolete processors but perfectly usable screens that you can't use.
What they *could* have done is made the Studio Display powered by USB-C and given the Mini/Studio at least one USB-C port that could power it (the current ports wouldn't hack it). Or vice versa (but then you'd still have a display power cable floating in the air).
I think one of the dividing lines here is whether you need anything other than a connection between computer and display. A solitary iMac is a thing of single-cabled beauty - a 5k iMac with cables for ethernet, a USB hub, a second display, a wired keyboard* and a backup drive all dangling down from a point 6" above your desktop and getting moved every time you adjust the display... not so much.
(* yup, why add all the complexity and unreliability of Bluetooth - including the need for batteries in the keyboard - when its sitting right there on the desktop, in easy wire range, and not going anywhere... it's not as if MacOS offers a 10' GUI any more)
He was plenty obnoxious, but it’s starting to make sense why you think he wasn’t..How dare he make a point in a discussion! Even worse, he wasn't even rude or obnoxious!
You will probably see the new iMacs with the intro of the M6... possibly October. If not then, then almost certainly early 2027.When will we see an updated Imac and what will be different than the M4Imac?
For me nothing will ever be as beautiful to look at, listen and watch as my 20th Anniversary Mac.View attachment 2651084
Not enough love for this ridiculous hyperbole, lol.Studio quality speakers that blast music so loud that my neighbors all hate me. But thats ok. Because I have an iMac.
Im waiting for them to revive this design.... give me this...and im a happy guy! View attachment 2649795
Refined with a smaller base, usb C ports, power button, etc. The back would also have 4 USB Ports as well but those dident render in this for some reason. I also told it to put the FaceID in the bezzle but CHATGPT Got lazy on that one.
View attachment 2649847
I mean these solutions work, but the image quality is not the same as a hardwire connection, especially for motion type applications (video, video editing, games, etc.) The signal is compressed, even over a fast connection.You do not need Target Display Mode. Air Display works just as well, or Synergy Desktop is what I use with my MacBook Neo.
Just buy it my friend. What color are you going to get?
The imac g4 mount is nothing like ASD. That counterbalance arm was a wonder. Maybe not necessary, but much adored.You mean like a Studio Display, a Mac Mini and 5 minutes neatly routing the 2 (Oh, the humanity!) extra cables?
Yes, but it's not a true direct thunderbolt connection. It's compressed, and is not of the same quality as a direct connection by a significant margin.Maybe I'm just not remembering properly how Target Display Mode worked, but isn't it possible now to just launch macOS on the target iMac and then on the source Mac, and extend or mirror your display from Display Settings in the source Mac? I thought that could be done via Wi-Fi or USB-C connection on macOS Ventura (or perhaps Monterey?) and above.
It's not the page on the screen that's off centre. It's the OS that's off centre.The notch isn’t off-centre. It’s the page on the screen thats’s off centre.