Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The lack of technical knowledge in here is staggering.

Well it is an Apple forum so what did you expect? Most folks here are just Apple fans and not necessarily into every aspect of how their stuff works. How many people who own an iPhone do you think actually plug it in for app updates? iOS updates?, etc? I know several who don't or are afraid to because it "might erase all their phone numbers". WTF people!
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_5 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8L1 Safari/6533.18.5)

BC2009 said:
A bit of a let-down, but this was not a deal breaker for me as it seems the iOS devices do very well on 512MB of RAM (at least my iPad 2 does). More RAM is always good providing the app developers don't get sloppy and hog it all up. So if Apple were to increase the RAM, I'd like them to limit individual apps so that no one app could use it all. I see the drawbacks there, but I think it is better than dealing with the App Store being loaded with apps from developers who fail to optimize their RAM usage and therefore apps being incompatible with older iPhones.

RAM hasn't been a problem for me yet on iPhone 4 but it was a huge issue on the 3G.

For developers though the problem of RAM availability can impact what apps end up on an "I" devices. It isn't always about being sloppy. One has to remember that not all of that RAM is free for apps and there is no paging (for data).

What does this say. Well more RAM might not be a big deal at the moment. For a developer it could be a problem. IPad 3 might very well require much more RAM especially if the display resolution increases.

From the users perspective, it is iOS 5 we have to worry about. Will iOS 5 reserve more RAM for itself or free up some RAM? I bring this up because features like SIRI must use some RAM. In the end it will take a bit of study to see if iOS 5 results in a significant regression when it comes to user RAM availability.
 
Who cares what the specs are if it works great?

people have been saying that the current idevices have worked great for years, yet every time theres a spec bump people are talking about how much faster, and what not the new device is. ergo, lots of people seem to care, even if it work(ed) great. for good reason too.

yes, theres more to a good experience than speccs. but that doesnt mean we can take speccs completely out of the equation now, can we? :- )
 
[url=http://cdn.macrumors.com/im/macrumorsthreadlogodarkd.png]Image[/url]


Image

Last week, the Infinity Blade developer first suggested that the iPhone 4S still had 512MB of RAM, just like the iPhone 4:The developer would be in a position to know as they had demoed their game on the new iPhone 4S during last week's keynote.

We had doubts about this claim, however, as we had previously heard that the new iPhone would carry 1GB of RAM. Note that we heard this alongside other information regarding Apple's Assistant feature that we accurately mocked up ahead of Siri's launch, so we were confident in the source.

But, now, AppVV also confirms that the iPhone 4S has 512MB of RAM. In a discussion thread an administrator reports that it has 512MB. This fact is repeated on their Weibo page as well in response to a question:Though they don't detail how they came to the figure, we're inclined to believe AppVV as they are the ones who posted a hands-on video of the iPhone 4S this morning.

Article Link: The iPhone 4S Appears to Have 512MB RAM

512MB at this stage of the game is straight ridiculousness! Thanks Tim Cook, another great decision.............

The RAM will definately be the BottleNeck for the graphical performance within the games of the iphone and will most likely limit Siri when multitasking.......................

1GB of RAM would have been nice.
 
Please say it isn't so, I'm so tired of 3 web pages refreshing. When I switch between them.
 
Sure, others have more RAM

But they don't have 1,000 employees working on custom chips. They use a generic OS and generic parts, fastest, biggest always best to get the nerds. If that's all they've got, I'm thinking because that's all they need. No need to light up a gig of RAM if you can scrunch it down to 512 MB. More battery life. More battery life.
 
Yeah this is probably for the best, means developers won't get sloppy with their coding and make 4S games virtually unplayable on other iDevices.

My Desire S has 768MB of RAM though, maybe a little boost from 512 to 768 would have been a nice compromise.
 
But they don't have 1,000 employees working on custom chips. They use a generic OS and generic parts, fastest, biggest always best to get the nerds. If that's all they've got, I'm thinking because that's all they need. No need to light up a gig of RAM if you can scrunch it down to 512 MB. More battery life. More battery life.

You can be assured that all ARM producers (i.e. Samsung, Qualcomm, TI and NVIDIA) each have way more engineers working on chips than Apple does.
 
Apple has always been stingy with RAM--whether it's in their computers or iStuff. And when they have offered extra RAM on their computers they gouge for it. I have no idea why they do this or why they have such an aversion to increasing the memory capacity of their devices when the costs clearly drop every year while the necessity of the boost goes up every year.
That's because Apple prioritizes the need for very fast memory over very much memory. Competition is still building in the slower 1066mHz ddr2 memory into thair consumer laptops while Apple have switched to the faster 1333mHz ddr3 banks with very, very low latency months ago! They also figured hardly anyone ever uses 8gb's of ram unless you're a heavy duty user. I am such a heavy duty user (lots of compiling and VM), so I always buy an aftermarket memory upgrade. But I have never experienced the same level of performance after the upgrade as with the stock memory just because I'm not willing to pay over 100 bucks for it. Low latency memory is way more expensive than standard consumer line memory, but if you prefer speed over size, well worth it!
 
Who started the misinformation about 1 GB of RAM anyway? Spec summaries came out the morning of the release. Surely Apple didn't reveal RAM specs, they never have.
 
I'll take 512 MB's of fast ram over 1 GB of slow RAM any day of the week.

exactly...
on pc magazines and websites they teach this for years...

take the graphics card with the faster ram if they have the same chip and the slower ram is double the sitze as it is on the card with the faster ram.

pc the same... take the one with "only" 4 gig, not the one with 8 gig but slower one... you don't need 8gig, not even with the newest games... faster rams outperforms more slower ram...

teribble - my english - i know :rolleyes: - so don't hurt me :D
 
More RAM please

1GB of RAM might not matter now, but anyone who doesn't upgrade their phone every time Apple releases a new one (or a new OS for that matter) knows that more RAM is essential if you don't want your phone to suck after 12 months.
 
I hope this is true. If so, then it bodes well for Siri coming to the iPad. I struggle with believing this because there has been NO (afaik) solid rumors about Siri working outside of the 4s. Has anyone heard of any other reason that the two should not be compatible?

I don't know why but the impression Apple is giving about Siri is it will be an iPhone 4S feature until maybe iPad 3. Just a guess so no facts like you asked for.
 
512MB at this stage of the game is straight ridiculousness! Thanks Tim Cook, another great decision.............

The RAM will definately be the BottleNeck for the graphical performance within the games of the iphone and will most likely limit Siri when multitasking.......................

1GB of RAM would have been nice.

Really, so you can quote a source that says the 512MB is limiting them in games as opposed to what they can do otherwise? Apple devs concerning Siri?

You can be assured that all ARM producers (i.e. Samsung, Qualcomm, TI and NVIDIA) each have way more engineers working on chips than Apple does.

Because Apple only produces one chip per year. The others either have a more varied product selection (Samsung, Qualcomm, TI) or a more aggressive release schedule (Nvidia).
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_5 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8L1 Safari/6533.18.5)



RAM hasn't been a problem for me yet on iPhone 4 but it was a huge issue on the 3G.

For developers though the problem of RAM availability can impact what apps end up on an "I" devices. It isn't always about being sloppy. One has to remember that not all of that RAM is free for apps and there is no paging (for data).

What does this say. Well more RAM might not be a big deal at the moment. For a developer it could be a problem. IPad 3 might very well require much more RAM especially if the display resolution increases.

From the users perspective, it is iOS 5 we have to worry about. Will iOS 5 reserve more RAM for itself or free up some RAM? I bring this up because features like SIRI must use some RAM. In the end it will take a bit of study to see if iOS 5 results in a significant regression when it comes to user RAM availability.

Good points about certain apps never making it to the iPhone potentially because of not enough RAM being available. Also a good point that iOS does not offer paging/swap/virtual memory using the solid state storage as swap. Further good point about the footprint of iOS5 -- certainly Siri will have an impact. That said, folks may find more available RAM on an iPhone 4 without Siri than they would on the iPhone 4S with Siri. I certainly would not be upset at getting 1GB of RAM on the iPhone 4S, but like I said -- it is not a deal breaker either.
 
1GB of RAM might not matter now, but anyone who doesn't upgrade their phone every time Apple releases a new one (or a new OS for that matter) knows that more RAM is essential if you don't want your phone to suck after 12 months.

My 3GS is a lot smoother than the SII, so I think you might be confused.

----------

Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_5 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8L1 Safari/6533.18.5)



Send an E-Mail to Cook. It will likely be ignored but I suspect Tim has had the most influence on pricing.

There is one fly in the ointment though, the multi chip module does imply a greater cost to add more RAM.

There are a lot of reasons not to just add more ram. Apple engineers devices without much concern for padding spec sheets. Other companies build spec sheets and the only engineering work that is done is determining how tomcram that spec sheet into a phone.
Well it is an Apple forum so what did you expect? Most folks here are just Apple fans and not necessarily into every aspect of how their stuff works. How many people who own an iPhone do you think actually plug it in for app updates? iOS updates?, etc? I know several who don't or are afraid to because it "might erase all their phone numbers". WTF people!

Arn, why aren't these called personal attacks when they are aimed at all the users? This post is still insulting and irrelevant. We see this stuff almost constantly lately.

----------

Engadget just reported that Samsung Galaxy SIII (which will be released at the beginning of the next year) is expected to have 2GB of RAM and 1.8 GHz CPU. So technically SGSIII will be able to run four copies of iPhone 4S emulator at a time.

Also said it has a 12mp camera and every other word on the internal chart in the original story is spelled wrong and non-sensical. Don't let that stop you from spreading a totally false rumor though.
 
There are a lot of reasons not to just add more ram. Apple engineers devices without much concern for padding spec sheets. Other companies build spec sheets and the only engineering work that is done is determining how tomcram that spec sheet into a phone.

As far as I'm concerned, this is all irrelevant as long as even my iPhone 4 isn't able to "remember" all its tabs in Safari. As long as this problem persists, the iPhone and the iPad obviously don't have enough RAM, because it's highly detrimental to the USER EXPERIENCE you and your sanctimonious ilk profess to cherish so much.
 
If this is true, that is a big fail on Apple's part.

Whether they are trying to increase profits or overlooked this, this just doesn't work out.

Android phones already have 1GB RAM, a person can never have enough RAM.
Same as a person can never have enough memory.

Apple fans can deny it but this iPhone was intended to compete with the other dual core 2011 Android phones, without 1GB RAM, there seems to be a big hole IMO.
 
only 512MB RAM? ...I'm hopeful the next iPhone is not very far away, six months?:D

this puts it on a par w/iPad2 and not ahead of it, right? ...why would they make iPhone more powerful than iPad?

so next spring (optimistically), iPhone 5 (1GB), iPad 3 (1GB also), both with more powerful A5 chip. ..and hopefully (iPhone) edge to edge screen, LiquidMetal back, NFC, 4G. Admit it, Siri is great, but they needs these specs to keep momentum going, siri will not sell iphones.
 
Well it is an Apple forum so what did you expect? Most folks here are just Apple fans and not necessarily into every aspect of how their stuff works. How many people who own an iPhone do you think actually plug it in for app updates? iOS updates?, etc? I know several who don't or are afraid to because it "might erase all their phone numbers". WTF people!

THIS THIS THIS ik soooo many people that r still on 4.0 and never plug in their iphone/ipad. Its always breaking my heart a little to see those crazy high numbers of avab app updates lol

Its the same ppl that still buy an 3GS now on a 2 years plan
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.