I used to think it was lawyers, politicos, and used car salesmen...now that I own a house and many of my friends have had one for a few years...nothing but horror stories about their contractors...
-J.-
-J.-
meteorology.
when you think about...the U.S. only needs the weather channel. you dont need thousands of "local" weathermen. - so in a way its a cottage industry that is useless.
normal day-to-day weather forecasting is all based on computer model and is more about the selling of the forecast than actually making the forecast.
the best forecasters know that and tend to do hurricanes, tornadoes, etc...more of the unusual...deadly..weather.
Think about that for a moment. So you'd rather one MASSIVE MASSIVE company having to do ALL the weather forecasting and putting loads of local people out of a job? I also think it would decrease the already somewhat ineffectual forecasts. It should be down to the local level. It has the added benefit of community, blah blah blah.
Weather seems a strange issue to get distrustful about. I mean, I take it with a grain of salt because I know they're often wrong but I wouldn't go so far as to list them as distrustful or sleazy.
Think about that for a moment. So you'd rather one MASSIVE MASSIVE company having to do ALL the weather forecasting and putting loads of local people out of a job? I also think it would decrease the already somewhat ineffectual forecasts. It should be down to the local level. It has the added benefit of community, blah blah blah.
<snip post>.
What? Like the Met Office in the UK? They efficiently supply pretty much all the forecasts in the UK...
DeVry graduates.
Push-up bra designers.
American Late-night talk-show hosts with big chins.
Desperate housewives.
Psychics.
Chinese restaurant owners with missing cats.
Google database information manager.
I almost put newscasters on my addendum above. Since weather forecasters have been mentioned, and perceived inefficiencies....
There will be a big shakedown in the broadcast media at some point. The morning news show was noting today that the Oscars are coming up. They are sending two of their regular journalists to cover it for them. I'm sure the same network will have another cadre of their regular reporters there as well, and so will the local TV affiliate of the same network, and maybe a local radio station also affiliated with that network will send a reporter to cover it. With the shrinking ratings and revenues they are seeing, sooner or later all that overlapping reporting will have to be consolidated. It's already happened with newspapers and news magazines, and they're not done yet.
As for the theme of this thread, as was mentioned above about the weather, they "tease" you with these over-sensationalized sound bites that distort the story they are about to report in an attempt to keep you tuned in. You can't trust 'em!
I think mobile phone salespeople are the only "professionals" that have ever actually lied straight to my face.
yeah..how about the Hawaii Tsunami watch this past Saturday. CNN's coverage was just shameful. Dirty Rick Sanchez basically killed some scientist just in an attempt to get him to say the how high the wave would be. Meanwhile when nothing happened, CNN then said..oh this might be a serious of waves that will take time to occur. I think their total coverage was a few hours. They all do it though.
Realtors.
Seller's Agent - will do anything to get you to buy a property so they can make a commission.
Buyer's Agent - will do anything to get you to buy a property so they can make a commission.
Maybe in Hollywood movies?! Are they really that corrupt in real life?Police Officer.
I have been watching this trend of dramatizing the forecast (so up North...giving snow storms way too much hype before it hits) and down south (hyping the possibility of thunderstorms etc.).
No they're not. At least not in the UK, members of my family and a few school friends joined the police and they're your regular upstanding-members-of-society kind of people.Maybe in Hollywood movies?! Are they really that corrupt in real life?
Exactly the reason why I voted politician too! Maybe I've been lucky but none of the other options ever let me down.I put politician. Anyone in the UK will be very familiar with the recent expenses scandal....that really appalled me!