I am going to wait until they offer the Apple Life Pod. Get in and spend your whole life in there.Can you provide further information on your in-depth analysis?
I am going to wait until they offer the Apple Life Pod. Get in and spend your whole life in there.Can you provide further information on your in-depth analysis?
Real life isn’t that great these days lol if the oasis from ready player one existed, I would be in it more than I’d be in the real worldI am going to wait until they offer the Apple Life Pod. Get in and spend your whole life in there.
Could not disagree more. Plenty of times when a product wasn’t quite what I wanted so I returned it and waited until it became better. Good enough for me.If a product is genuinely useful, it doesn’t need to be given second chances.
You’re of course right, but in this context, since only the chip and the head strap have been updated, it’s essentially the same product. The issues that applied to the first iteration still apply almost entirely to this version as well.Could not disagree more. Plenty of times when a product wasn’t quite what I wanted so I returned it and waited until it became better. Good enough for me.
The very first iPhone in 2007 is an example. Loved it. Returned it because of slow internet, dropped calls on AT&T and no mms messaging or App Store. Super basic. But the foundation was there. Jumped back in iPhone 3GS when things improved.
Just because someone doesn’t like the initial product, doesn’t mean it can’t improve enough to finally fit their needs
I know someone at work that tried the first Vision Pro on release and complained about different things that are totally fixed now. He got the new m5 with the new head strap and is happy with it now. He’s an account manager and i routinely walk in on him using it and we’ve had conversations about his issues with it a year ago.You’re of course right, but in this context, since only the chip and the head strap have been updated, it’s essentially the same product. The issues that applied to the first iteration still apply almost entirely to this version as well.
I think mainstream is a stretch. A majority of people not using them have rejected the entire genre because they don’t want isolation and goggles. That won’t be fixed.We got a few more years before the vision air brings it mainstream
It’s niche for some plainly obvious reasons. The tech to have it be truly good is expensive. The tech to make it small enough for the everyday person to even want to use it doesn’t even exist yet. Right now it’s related mostly to nerds like me and people that want to try new things.I think mainstream is a stretch. A majority of people not using them have rejected the entire genre because they don’t want isolation and goggles. That won’t be fixed.
A majority of users are Windows users. Until that’s fixed it can’t go mainstream, same issue with iPod years ago.
Thats the marketing answer, but it just isn’t reality. People don’t want to watch sports by themselves. The “immersive” aspect is being with people, whether at a stadium or a bar and not only does this not replicate that, it excludes that.Immersive sports are a huge draw. Once that becomes more prevalent, its going to feel antiquated to watch it on a flat screen at home.
lol check in with me in 10 years. We’ll see i guess? I remember hearing people don’t wear watches anymore too. Then Apple Watch came. I remember hearing AirPods was a stupid idea “nobody wants another thing to charge and lose. Wired is fine”. Yet here we are. Thank god technological progress doesn’t stop because people can’t envision a future with something different.Thats the marketing answer, but it just isn’t reality. People don’t want to watch sports by themselves. The “immersive” aspect is being with people, whether at a stadium or a bar and not only does this not replicate that, it excludes that.
Apple watch had very little to do with that. Apple jumped on the bandwagon but they were seriously late to the party (and still lag on features today). Watches have a clear use-case and aren’t intrusive, AVP doesnt and is.lol check in with me in 10 years. We’ll see i guess? I remember hearing people don’t wear watches anymore too. Then Apple Watch came. I remember hearing AirPods was a stupid idea “nobody wants another thing to charge and lose. Wired is fine”. Yet here we are. Thank god technological progress doesn’t stop because people can’t envision a future with something different.
Exactly. AVP has no use case. Nor any products that will be spawned from technologies developed from it. Who needs a heads up display that can show turn by turn directions IN your vision? People love pulling out phones. Who needs the ability to have a 100inch monitor anywhere you go? People love taking 100 inch tvs with them everywhere they go. Ya know what? It’s easier to spend a few thousand dollars on those lakers tickets and a plane and motel for the weekend than sit at home in your Vision Pro with a watch party. Immersive learning where you can take apart an engine piece by piece? Nah. Who needs that? A flat book is better.Apple watch had very little to do with that. Apple jumped on the bandwagon but they were seriously late to the party (and still lag on features today). Watches have a clear use-case and aren’t intrusive, AVP doesnt and is.
i certainly do. i never watch sports with others anymore. everybody is different and also not everybody likes same sport or is able to watch together anymore. certainly not as you get older.Thats the marketing answer, but it just isn’t reality. People don’t want to watch sports by themselves. The “immersive” aspect is being with people, whether at a stadium or a bar and not only does this not replicate that, it excludes that.
i was thinking about getting a tri fold for a 10 inch display in my pocket but decided on vision pro instead. why? well cost will be similar and on vision pro i can have a 200 inch display and use multple windows at once and still use same apps i can use on a foldable. if i'm spending basically same level of cash i would rather buy something thats basically better at everything for the same priceExactly. AVP has no use case. Nor any products that will be spawned from technologies developed from it. Who needs a heads up display that can show turn by turn directions IN your vision? People love pulling out phones. Who needs the ability to have a 100inch monitor anywhere you go? People love taking 100 inch tvs with them everywhere they go. Ya know what? It’s easier to spend a few thousand dollars on those lakers tickets and a plane and motel for the weekend than sit at home in your Vision Pro with a watch party. Immersive learning where you can take apart an engine piece by piece? Nah. Who needs that? A flat book is better.
I myself get to work with a horse and only use sun dials to tell time
If those things are spawned it’s not from AVP, loads of augmented reality came before it like the Hololens. There are industrial use cases, as Microsoft discovered.Exactly. AVP has no use case. Nor any products that will be spawned from technologies developed from it. Who needs a heads up display that can show turn by turn directions IN your vision? People love pulling out phones. Who needs the ability to have a 100inch monitor anywhere you go? People love taking 100 inch tvs with them everywhere they go. Ya know what? It’s easier to spend a few thousand dollars on those lakers tickets and a plane and motel for the weekend than sit at home in your Vision Pro with a watch party. Immersive learning where you can take apart an engine piece by piece? Nah. Who needs that? A flat book is better.
I myself get to work with a horse and only use sun dials to tell time
I mean yeah right? I can’t even believe they invented something as stupid as the iPhone when Mapquest existed. It’s just as useful on a sheet of paper i can look down at. Or a tom tom for the car for directions. Just get a tom tom and have a house rotary phone and you’re good to go. Who NEEDS a phone with them 24/7? I don’t think that’ll catch onIf those things are spawned it’s not from AVP, loads of augmented reality came before it like the Hololens. There are industrial use cases, as Microsoft discovered.
Realistically though, things like turn by turn are just as convenient on the wrist and normal people neither need or want a 100” screen everywhere they go. Those things are mutually exclusive by the way, you can either have convenient augmented glasses or a usable 100” screen. One device cannot do both well.
Maps on phones had been a thing for at least a decade before iphone. You’re still thinking tech for the sake of technis always good. Sometimes it just isn’t. AVP is intrusive no matter how you look at it. Even small and light versions get rejected hard by society, Google found this out with the glasshole phenomenon, and Meta are about to demonstrate that again with theirs.I mean yeah right? I can’t even believe they invented something as stupid as the iPhone when Mapquest existed. It’s just as useful on a sheet of paper i can look down at. Or a tom tom for the car for directions. Just get a tom tom and have a house rotary phone and you’re good to go. Who NEEDS a phone with them 24/7? I don’t think that’ll catch on
Don’t tell me. Tell Tim Cook! They’re making a big mistake that’s going to cost them many many dollars. Surely Apple Vision Pro is dead and nobody wants it. Apple just didn’t get the memo from commenters online and rage bait articles. I thought the nail was in the coffin last year when everyone who never wanted the product told me it was badMaps on phones had been a thing for at least a decade before iphone. You’re still thinking tech for the sake of technis always good. Sometimes it just isn’t. AVP is intrusive no matter how you look at it. Even small and light versions get rejected hard by society, Google found this out with the glasshole phenomenon, and Meta are about to demonstrate that again with theirs.
If it seems like I’m not taking your comments as seriously as you wish them to be, it’s because i just can’t. It could not be more obvious that issues have been addressed and more will as time goes on. You’re just full of dated opinions that are going to age like milkI don’t really care what they do, my original comment was that all they did was update tech specs and that addresses none of the issues it had. Processing power wasn’t holding it back, everything else was.
Like the stuff in your peripheral vision? A little bit.Hello from Austria. One question: does the blurry image of the surroundings (your flat) get better with the M5 model? Windows of VisionOS are very crisp but everything else is blurry with my M2 model…
The device will support 1200Mbps. Spatial video streaming requires ~80Mbps at the high end. Even ProRes video only requires ~800Mbps. What is your use case?