Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It doesn’t mean everything but that doesn’t mean there isn’t an important effect

Pickups used to be all utilitarian. When guys started buying them for commuting and groceries, feature lists exploded. Now the same utility buyer (say rancher) can get those same features more easily.

Conversely, consumers buying PCs gave natural importance to their design and production volume that benefited producers on economies of scale. Loosing them means paying more but also getting more producer focused designs.

I’m a fan of both mini and iMac and just replaced my 2007 iMac with a 5k. Retina + 4 core + 2500 ssd is the winning combination.

If Intel is shifting standard laptop processors to 4 core, this is the way forward for mini. Mix in 4K hdmi + 2500 ssd and its time to replace my 2010 mini. It’s almost certainly coming.
 
We are in the twilight of the desktop era. Accept it. Can anyone even name an exciting new Mac application? No. The era is ending.

No it's not. There is no way I could do my work on an iPad or a phone. Apple marketing would have you beleive this but with recent product launches the only thing they appear to be good at right now is alienating customers.
 
I would like to meet those people who manage to do ANY work done on a smartphone o_O I am aware that there is Word, Excel etc. for smartphones, but how exactly do people use Word on a 6" or smaller screen?

They don't. Nobody here has made that argument. However, I will say that plenty of people get work done on laptops for example, and those have outsold desktops for well over a decade. I work in a software engineering company and about 2/3rds of the engineers here prefer laptops for their portability over the greater power of a desktop.

Those numbers do not mean anything.

Phone and tablet users only consume content.
Desktop and laptop users produce content.

I would argue that they are extremely meaningful.

If you are going to make new hardware, software, and services, what are the customers using? Think of all the new technologies in the last 10 years. Are you going to make navigation software for Windows, or for iOS? Are you going to make an Uber application that's designed for a desktop or a mobile? Are you going to make a new iPhone every year or a new Mac Mini every year? Device type marketshare is extraordinarily important.
 
Are you going to make navigation software for Windows, or for iOS? Are you going to make an Uber application that's designed for a desktop or a mobile?
I agree with your point but these are probably not the best examples because they are mobile applications in nature and benefit greatly from being on mobile devices, regardless of the marketshare.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yvan256
They way I see it, AIO are more profitable per unit for two reasons.

First it allows them to sell us a bigger package. As you said the iMac are often a better value when you take into account the price of the 5k screen. A lot of people would never consider to buy a 5k screen along with their Mac Mini because they don't see the need, they'll just keep their monitor (which was the whole idea of the Mac Mini, to bring your own accessories) or buy a cheap 3rd party one. When you buy an AIO they sell us a more expensive product but we're fine with it because of the added value of the monitor.

Then, when we buy an AIO/laptop/phone/tablet, we're ready to spend more for the look and feel of the device because we'll see it all the time. Apple knows this and is able to price their product above the competition and still sell a ton of them. When you buy a headless computer you don't really care about it because it can be hidden away so they can't justify a much higher price than their competitor. Some even made fun of them for trying to do it with the latest Mac Pro.

But in the end I don't know the prices of the components and where they make their money.

Apple flat out admit they accept less margin on the Mini than other Macs. Basically, per unit they make less money and if it were being treated like an iMac in terms of percentage margin the retail price would be higher than it is now. Even if it sold like hotcakes they'd probably make more profit on a single iMac (easily because the retail price per unit is higher).

The forthcoming Apple displays might be a watershed moment because in theory they ought to be fully Thunderbolt 3 units with a full set of IO onboard and shielded with wifi, plus capable of powering MacBook Pros. I've said before that if these displays are capable of powering a MacBook Pro they ought to be able to power a redesigned Mac Mini (if Apple choose to go that way) but of course such a Mini would have to be designed at the same time as the displays with an eye on the joining the two together easily.

To give you an example of an all-round design, a BTO version of a 2018 Mac Mini could allow users to delete the USB-C adaptor for a discount if the intention was always to pair it with an Apple monitor.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Glmnet1
I predict that Apple discontinues their new monitors after about a year. They cannot seem to make up their mind very well about monitors. One huge reason for the epic fail will be, of course, the lack of a mini to pair them with, LOL!
 
  • Like
Reactions: opeter and leo-tech
However, I will say that plenty of people get work done on laptops for example, and those have outsold desktops for well over a decade. I work in a software engineering company and about 2/3rds of the engineers here prefer laptops for their portability over the greater power of a desktop.

Yes, but how many of those are hybrid desktops (i.e. laptops with big monitors, keyboards, docking station and input devices... a desktop in other words) - where, yes they can take it home but connect to full-sized peripherals??
 
I am 1) expecting it, 2) being excited about it and 3) being terrified by the idea. Because you just know it will not turn into a Mac of any sort, but a large iPad with large iOS (and on a 27" screen still five tiny icons in a row that you won't be able to reorder).



I would like to meet those people who manage to do ANY work done on a smartphone o_O I am aware that there is Word, Excel etc. for smartphones, but how exactly do people use Word on a 6" or smaller screen?

Here is basically how I use Word, Excel etc on my phone. I don't edit things at all, I only look at documents that people send to my work email. Like agendas for meetings. I would never actually try to edit a document on my phone haha that would be crazy.
 
Man the new Ryzen+Vega 2200G and 2400G chips would make a pretty sweet Mac Mini if Apple was ever willing to use AMD CPUs
 
Those numbers do not mean anything.

Phone and tablet users only consume content.
Desktop and laptop users produce content.


That's like comparing sales of pick-up trucks to cars and proclaiming the death of construction sites because there's more cars sold than trucks.

Do we call photo and video creation and light editing on smartphones and tablets NOT producing content? Many submit crime footage and news footage using just their smartphones.

Should we all just give up home and then build out a raspberry pi type device that has USB-C/Thunderbolt ports (if one exists) and load macOS/OSX on it?

[EDITED: just to be to the point]
 
Last edited:
Why even debate how someone gets work done - what's important is getting work done. Desktop vs laptop vs smartphone is really beginning to show its age - don't you think?

I mean if there was anything truly revolutionary or even evolutionary (i.e. 4K-8K content and hardware is readily available to the masses - AR / VR changes in the way we interact with computers - ditching the keyboard or using predictive sentence creation maximizing keystrokes into whole sentences instead of characters expanding on what the iPhone does now) we'd have something to really talk about perhaps.

But tired as it is ... we've reached a plateau and until something breaks the ice we can just wax and wane the ambivalence of Apple.
 
Last edited:
I suppose this is the future Apple wants for desktop computing - plugin your desktop iPhone and become a "Pro"!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0896-2.jpg
    IMG_0896-2.jpg
    685.1 KB · Views: 262
Last edited:
You'd think moving forward the goal would be to make any ergonomic scenario productive and enable computing to meld with that requirement - thus the Mini more closely fits that need. Small, configurable, portable and somewhat (2012) powerful.
 
Tim in Fast Company interview today: "For us, on the product side, we have to come up with our silicon requirements three, four-plus years in advance. So we’ve got things that we’re working on now that are way out in the 2020s"

Previously in October, 2017, Tim: "we do plan for Mac mini to be an important part of our product line going forward."

So, sometime between almost certainly coming next Tuesday and sometime before the end of next decade.

Is it really so hard to design this kind of box? I guessing the Hades Canyon nuc took less than 2 years with the AMD/Intel package. If I could order a Mac OS device with similar size, I/O, and specs next month, I would not hesitate. It would be perfect for my needs.
 
My faithful quad-core Mac mini remains faithful. But if a meteor hit it (but not me at the same time, given that I'm a foot and a half from it right now), I'd have to go to eBay to find a replacement, because Apple is only selling placeholders right now.
 
The thing is....WAY too much time has gone since the last (disappointing) update for the mini. If another mini does surface some year down the line, it's sure to be a dissapointment too cuz it has to be a bottom spec Mac and nothing can live up to users expectations & hopes after waiting 5 freaking years. Tim's Apple clearly despises the mini regardless of the lip service paid to it.
 
The thing is....WAY too much time has gone since the last (disappointing) update for the mini. If another mini does surface some year down the line, it's sure to be a dissapointment too cuz it has to be a bottom spec Mac and nothing can live up to users expectations & hopes after waiting 5 freaking years. Tim's Apple clearly despises the mini regardless of the lip service paid to it.

Meh. 8GB RAM, SSD standard and ability to run 4k @ 60hz is all I ask for.

Literally every computer manufacturer on earth can manage that at an extremely reasonable price, but not Apple. No Sir. They are too busy milking the rubes with 4GB machines that run 5400 spinners... in 2018.
 
Perhaps the business model Tim et al. are following isn’t the traditional tech model, but rather the pusher’s model. Get your users hooked on a particular dose, then withhold it while they become more and more anxious about their next fix. Then you can bring out your 'new' product, stepped on as much as you want, at a premium price, and it’ll sell like hotcakes. (Cue Steppenwolf ‘The Pusherman’.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cape Dave
the pusher’s model.

Slashdot Asks: What Do People Misunderstand or Underappreciate About Apple?
Tim Cook:
We don't want people to have to focus on bits and bytes and feeds and speeds. We don't want people to have to go to multiple [systems] or live with a device that's not integrated. We do the hardware and the software, and some of the key services as well, to provide a whole system. We do that in such a way that we infuse humanity into it.

Do not stray from the mainstream of the brand.
There are edges.
 
That statement is so bleeping warm and fuzzy (particularly fuzzy) that it makes me want to install Windows Vista on my iMac (or maybe Microsoft Bob). Couple this with the picture of Tim now showing on this site's Front Page and I think I know where the problem is.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.