Seems pretty clear to me that the reason Apple doesn't upgrade the Mini is because they just don't care about it, in spite of a vague statement in an e-mail that one of Tim Cook's assistants (or bots?) sent to some guy.... 
It would have a huge impact on margins. Right now, the 8GB/SSD mini is $899, and you want to cut that to $499!My understanding (and believe) is that Apple should offer the base config for $499 with SSD and 8GB Ram already. Unless Mr. Operations Guy at the helm purchased a warehouse full of 5400 spinners and 4GB Ram PCB’s, that shouldn’t even have a relevant impact on Apple’s margin.
Heck, I could even imagine that it’d improve Apple’s margin, as buying antique technology as that in the currently offered mini usually is more expensive than going with mainstream parts. And as ActionableMango demonstrated, SSD’s are mainstream nowadays (and so are 8GB of Ram).
I'm sure your mom loves looking at the spinning beachball.Specifically, my Mom. She mostly lives in Safari: Facebook, gmail, google, checking her bank account, paying bills. She likes to listen to Spotify in the background. There are a couple shows she watches on Netflix. She uses FaceTime to talk to a friend of hers in Australia. She likes to write, she uses Pages.
Nothing she does is very demanding. She hates Windows and would never buy or use a PC. She loves her mini and doesn’t think of it as slow. She bought it because a friend of hers had one and she liked it.
Would a $899 8GB/SSD be faster and offer a better user experience? Sure, of course it would. But $400 is a lot of money, isn’t it?
It would have a huge impact on margins. Right now, the 8GB/SSD mini is $899, and you want to cut that to $499!
The alternative to a $499 HDD mini isn’t a $499 SSD mini. It’s an $899 SSD mini. Apple makes almost nothing on the $499 mini, and the component cost of HDD vs SSD is irrelevant. Apple needs to get the selling price into the $800-900 range for them to get the margins they need.
Personally I always recommend spending an extra $100 to get 8GB. I think the 2018 base mini will have 8GB, so maybe it will start at $599. But it won’t have an SSD at that price. Maybe a 128GB or 1TB Fusion at $799, I think that’s about as low as we can expect.
The Pro is announced for 2019 launch, I'm sure this will include the Mini if it still exists.
The Pro is announced for 2019 launch, I'm sure this will include the Mini if it still exists.
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/apples-revamped-mac-pro-to-launch-in-2019.2113685/
At least the guy was honest, the real reason for this "transparency" is to sell more iMac Pro's.
"In addition to transparency for pro customers on an individual basis, there's also a larger fiscal reasoning behind it."
Just looked through a few of the comments on that story, but was surprised at how many people asked "what about the Mini?"
I'd say that there's a largish group that's interested in headless desktop systems across a wide range of capabilities. Common core of desires are (1) headless, (2) DIY expandable, (3) a decent upgrade tempo, and (4) a sense that the vendor gives a crap about their products and customers. Thin and stylishly elegant, not so much.Just looked through a few of the comments on that story, but was surprised at how many people asked "what about the Mini?"
What do you think about this concept of new mac mini:
https://www.behance.net/gallery/64103537/Mac-mini-2018-concept
Perhaps you should read of others use of a more expensive MAc Mini - https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/mac-mini-rainbow-wheel.2113649/No, you are missing the point:
There are perfectly fine use cases for the $499 mini. It was true in 2014 and it’s still true today.
"Cute. Remove the ports." – Jony IveWhat do you think about this concept of new mac mini:
https://www.behance.net/gallery/64103537/Mac-mini-2018-concept
And I'm sure the "headless desktop team" will start designing new mini, when the new MP's design is finished.The Pro is announced for 2019 launch, I'm sure this will include the Mini if it still exists.
4 tb3 ports?What do you think about this concept of new mac mini:
https://www.behance.net/gallery/64103537/Mac-mini-2018-concept
Four Thunderbolt 3 ports is wishful thinking. There's a slight chance a mini with four Thunderbolt 3 ports would make it compelling enough to eat into iMac Pro sales, and Apple can't have that...What do you think about this concept of new mac mini:
https://www.behance.net/gallery/64103537/Mac-mini-2018-concept
4 tb3 ports?
What chip inside would allow this?
As long as there's a 4GB spinner model then we're talking. Otherwise don't call us.What do you think about this concept of new mac mini:
https://www.behance.net/gallery/64103537/Mac-mini-2018-concept
I think you mean the old Mini was big due to the heat sink (the case) and the jet engine fan to cool the Intel chip from overheating. ARM chips don't have that problem.Hmmm- since an iPhone SE is just about as powerful as a Mac Mini (and the iPhone X blows its doors off) - that render concept is WAY too big. The old Mac mini was the size it was to be able to fit CDs & DVDs. That's no longer necessary. If Apple ever does make another Mac mini -,it's gunna be itsy bits tiny.